David Clapson
Well-Known Member
Memories of what happened on June 7. Deji Omishore tortured with a taser until he jumped off Chelsea Bridge. The news and the police initially said he was armed with a screwdriver. It was a firelighter.
Where's the lie?
I'm sorry but that's just a load of equally prejudiced guesswork based on "ACAB" and your desire to frame the copper. Turned his life around? Come on, you're as biased as you claim I am.So you made a guess. You guessed that he was trying to run over a policeman.
The only facts we had at the time was that a Black man had been shot dead by a policeman.
And even after it became pretty obvious that the police were at the least dissembling about some of the details you continued to guess that the dead man had been trying to escape.
Further, you state that this is something you wouldn’t do.
And rather than extending your assumption and anticipation about your own behaviour to Chris Kaba, you guessed he would do something different, something that you would never do.
Why is that? What is that based in? What clues or prompts led you to make this guess?
And before you say “Well he had these associations to the gang and a prior conviction“ that’s still not enough to give you any certainty that he was intending or attempting to run over the copper.
Chris Kaba did his time, and by all public accounts had turned his life around.
Can you really truly not see how prejudiced you sound?
Prejudiced as in pre-judging based on assumption.
I‘m not going to speculate about what’s underlying your judgement. But you know, don’t you,
Right, so you can't refute the evidence that he was a gang member and criminal.You be better off staying off this thread as you earlier said you would.
You tried this man and don't have a problem with him being shot by the police.
So lets cut the crap here please.
Instead of popping up here to comment.
You've made your views clear to posters.
Right, so you can't refute the evidence that he was a gang member and criminal.
Fuck me - you’re believing the “eyewitness” just as people believed there was a chase.There's an eyewitness who literally said exactly what I'm now saying it appears happened. The whataboutery isnt coming from my side.
The witness was quoted in this Standard article. Some of it might be true. We don't know yet. But the witness does sound a bit naive. He's unable to put himself in the shoes of a black guy in London who has guns pointed at him by the police. Rapper dies after being shot by police in StreathamThere's an eyewitness who literally said exactly what I'm now saying it appears happened. The whataboutery isnt coming from my side.
Eyewitness quotes in the media are notoriously reliable, eh? Like those ones that witnessed the shooting of Charles Jean De Mendez...There's an eyewitness who literally said exactly what I'm now saying it appears happened. The whataboutery isnt coming from my side.
It wasn’t his car.Right, so you can't refute the evidence that he was a gang member and criminal.
Unfortunately your media source is behind the Telegraph paywall - though the Daily Mail relays the information hereFour men appeared in court at the end of October charged with conspiracy to murder in connection with a 23-year old victim who was shot dead in a club on 30 August. There would have been five men appearing if Kaba was still alive, as he is alleged to have been a key participant in the murder.
a 23 year old victim who as it turns out was not shot dead. so ck could not have been a key participant in a murder that never was. i'm not surprised to see you posting such bollocks, you've a clear agenda on this thread to suggest chris kaba had it coming, following an obvious police agenda.Four men appeared in court at the end of October charged with conspiracy to murder in connection with a 23-year old victim who was shot dead in a club on 30 August. There would have been five men appearing if Kaba was still alive, as he is alleged to have been a key participant in the murder.
a 23 year old victim who as it turns out was not shot dead. so ck could not have been a key participant in a murder that never was.
it's plain you don't do factsHe survived the shooting, that's ok then. Thanks for reading the Mail for me.
It's a bit more complicated than that because the council adduced poor management of the venue, and failings like not searching bags properly have been reported. But all this is a smokescreen from the way Chris kaba has been brought into this, to suggest that he was the sort of person it's OK for the cops to shoot.The club in question was Oval Space which consequently lost it license due to these arseholes who think its ok human behaviour to go around shooting people they don't like.
Right, so you can't refute the evidence that he was a gang member and criminal.
We do have death squadsPlaying the half-way Devil’s Advocate stance here, but regardless of whether he had it coming to him, the case has to rest on whether the police were justified in killing him in that particular instance.
The argument shouldn’t be diverted into being about whether we have surplus cunts, it should be about whether we have death squads.
I met a couple of SPG officers on Clapham Common back around 1983 - in military fatigues. Naively thought they were ordinary punters dressed up for kicks. Unfortunately a police car appeared with headlights full on, the two dudes arrested me and bundled me into the back seat between them "We'll see if he's not talking when he's been in the station a few days!"Around 2006 I met a probationery police officer who was a former Army sniper and was being fast-tracked into a police firearms job in the Met. There was a shortage of firearms officers and he was one of a number of soldiers who had been recruited to fill the gap. There seemed to be almost no ordinary policing in his working week. I'd love to know how well soldiers have adapted to the Met's rules of engagement. Could be an interesting FOI question for someone?
go on thenAround 2006 I met a probationery police officer who was a former Army sniper and was being fast-tracked into a police firearms job in the Met. There was a shortage of firearms officers and he was one of a number of soldiers who had been recruited to fill the gap. There seemed to be almost no ordinary policing in his working week. I'd love to know how well soldiers have adapted to the Met's rules of engagement. Could be an interesting FOI question for someone?
Well, obviously not personal experience of their murderousness, soft lad.Yeah and I've got lived experience of fucking murderous drug gangs.
If you've ever been involved in a court case where your lawyer asks for discovery of police video records, you'll know just how often such evidence conveniently "goes missing" if it'll show the Met's Finest in a bad light, or that the camera was "damaged", or that the hard drive the CCTV was stored on "was faulty", etc etc fucking etc.If there was no chase it could probably be proven with video evidence from all sorts of cameras, plus the GPS trackers fitted to many police cars, and the GPS in all the officers' phones. (There'd probably be 9 officers, because armed reponse vehicles usually work in threes. )
Edit: and the police control room cooperates with chases. Senior officers have to be notified of some chases. I would think that three armed reponse vehicles chasing a vehicle with a firearms ANPR tag is something that the senior officer in the control room would be informed of immediately. Plus the senior officer is supposed to give permission for ramming, if circumstances permit. So you'd have to get a very large number of officers, including at least one inspector, to tell the same lie, if you want to concoct a chase.
Another edit: the police cars have dashcams! Of course they do. The IOPC is "reviewing a large amount of footage including from body worn video, police car dashcams, police helicopter and CCTV"
Safe to say that this notion of a faked chase is yet more epic bullshit. Statement from IOPC Director General Michael Lockwood regarding fatal police shooting in Lambeth | Independent Office for Police Conduct