Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Child in buggy blown on to London Tube station tracks

Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting that you only mention viewing Bungle's responses with dismay, I saw everybody's responses with dismay.
I saw Bungle's responses with dismay for a rather different reason. I've been on Urban enough to know what a bunfight looks like: what I felt I was seeing with Bungle was someone actually starting to lose it. Hence the dismay.
 
...after all the names Spymaster and I have called each other, I wasn't expecting support from him.

I don't know why not. I think you're an outstanding poster. We bang heads on a couple of issues but you've been very kind to me occasionally over the years.

To be honest I was looking forward to taking you ALL on in arguing why "stupid woman" wasn't sexist in this instance, but that intention got fucked amidst the bunfight.

I just don't like it when one poster gets hammered by ten.
 
To be honest I was looking forward to taking you ALL on in arguing why "stupid woman" wasn't sexist in this instance, but that intention got fucked amidst the bunfight.
I think a few (myself included) were probably guilty of being a bit obtuse about that point, but he really doesn't help himself at times.
 
I don't know why not. I think you're an outstanding poster. We bang heads on a couple of issues but you've been very kind to me occasionally over the years.

To be honest I was looking forward to taking you ALL on in arguing why "stupid woman" wasn't sexist in this instance, but that intention got fucked amidst the bunfight.

I just don't like it when one poster gets hammered by ten.
Hard to know what to do, though. How do the ten decide which one's the one to go mano a mano (*runs and hides*) with the offender?
 
Hard to know what to do, though. How do the ten decide which one's the one to go mano a mano (*runs and hides*) with the offender?

I think there's a difference between obviously objectionable wankers (Tobyjug, Steelgate, and Diesel, spring immediately to mind) who deserved all the kickings they got; and clumsy, touchy, fuckers, like Bungle who make good points but get needled by others into meltdown.

It's not fair.
 
Sometimes you don't join in because people are already more or less making the point you agree with. Sometimes you can't be arsed. Sometimes even though there are 10 people on one side of an argument, the person on the other has said something so provocative / interesting / bizarre, you can't resist answering. Even if you don't have the opportunity to do so, til later on. Thus adding to what on the surface looks like a mob. But it's not as if people coordinate.

Anyway, much as it's just common decency to step back and stop arguing with someone who appears to be losing it or the point's being laboured. It's also frustrating and pointless, if you're someone who likes an occasional argument, to not get involved out of some misguided self sensoring to prevent looking like a bully. As I think existentialist said the other day, Urban's not a gentteal debating society.
 
I include myself in the few
article-0-002C980D00000258-564_468x372.jpg

come on chaps - bungle's on the warpath

:p
 
I wouldn't say I feel picked on but that doesn't mean your not doing it.
Twice you have picked me out of everyone else on this thread when I was being, I think, far less full on that a lot of people.

ETA: OK the first time you put Toggle in there too and she was also being far more polite than a lot.


interesting. again, out of all the people involved, it's the women whose behavior is being deemed unacceptable.
 
interesting. again, out of all the people involved, it's the women whose behavior is being deemed unacceptable.

See, why did you have to make it a gender thing?

Couldn't it be possible that Welts just disagreed with KP regardless?

Now I'm ready to kick off!

<opens another can of Stella> ;)
 
I think there's a difference between obviously objectionable wankers (Tobyjug, Steelgate, and Diesel, spring immediately to mind) who deserved all the kickings they got; and clumsy, touchy, fuckers, like Bungle who make good points but get needled by others into meltdown.

It's not fair.

Frankly, Bungle's good point/crap point ratio is massively skewed toward the latter, and he has mostly brought his meltdowns on himself by talking utter shite and getting picked up on it.
 
See, why did you have to make it a gender thing?

Couldn't it be possible that Welts just disagreed with KP regardless?

Now I'm ready to kick off!

<opens another can of Stella> ;)

because he's made it clear that he singled out kitty out of everyone else who he also disagreed with. and also picked out me.

at the very least, it is backing up bungle's gendered attacks.

and if you want a proper fight, you will have to wait, i'm getting migraine symptoms again. not much pain, but a fuzzy yhead and vertigo. the 'ask a glass of water' stag of being drunk
 
because he's made it clear that he singled out kitty out of everyone else who he also disagreed with. and also picked out me.

at the very least, it is backing up bungle's gendered attacks.

and if you want a proper fight, you will have to wait, i'm getting migraine symptoms again. not much pain, but a fuzzy yhead and vertigo. the 'ask a glass of water' stag of being drunk

Sallright. Illll take im onnn! *holds up can and spills some on self*
 
He's allowed to disagree with me but he kept picking me out and telling me off when other people were saying far more abrasive things.

*Swings strong polish lager*

That's how it goes though isn't it? When disagreeing with the thrust of an argument it's often easier and more productive to respond to one poster who seems to hold the views of others, rather than take on all-comers individually.

I didn't really follow you spat with Weltweit and cant be arsed going back but I'll eat my shoes if he disagreed with you because you're a woman.

<moves on to a large G&T>
 
I've been mugging bugle off for the best part of a year, all you jonny come latelies are just that *sniff*

but yeah, sometimes someone is just a cock.
 
That's how it goes though isn't it? When disagreeing with the thrust of an argument it's often easier and more productive to respond to one poster who seems to hold the views of others, rather than take on all comers individually.

I didn't really follow you spat with Weltweit and cant be arsed going back but I'll eat my shoes if he disagreed with you because you're a woman.

<moves on to a large G&T>

I don't think that's why he did it either (not intentionally anyway) but its funny how these things seem to work out isn't it?
I think it was more as Pickmans said, it was because he felt he could say it to me (and toggle) and not others.
But we are the two women (sorry if there were other women I can't really remember now) who were calling Bungle to task.

And I didn't really have a spat with him.
 
I've been mugging bugle off for the best part of a year, all you jonny come latelies are just that *sniff*

but yeah, sometimes someone is just a cock.
I remember a strange conversation with him about some shite popcorn movie. He thought an IMDb rating PROVED unequivocally that this film was good and I was out of order for begging to differ.
 
I remember a strange conversation with him about some shite popcorn movie. He thought an IMDb rating PROVED unequivocally that this film was good and I was out of order for begging to differ.

See this is what I am talking about.
If it was just on this thread I would not have said anything but it#s bloody everywhere!
 
I think it was more as Pickmans said, it was because he felt he could say it to me (and toggle) and not others.
But we are the two women (sorry if there were other women I can't really remember now) who were calling Bungle to task.

Cobblers.

Often the vehemence of the posts is what is responded to.

You and Toggle were particularly active at that point.

The fact that you're both women had fuck all to do with it and I reckon you know that!

Why play the gender card?





<eyes up the cask strength Glenlivet>
 
Cobblers.

Often the vehemence of the posts is what is responded to.

You and Toggle were particularly active at that point.

The fact that you're both women had fuck all to do with it and I reckon you know that!

Why play the gender card?





<eyes up the cask strength Glenlivet>
you know what happens when you eye up the cask strength glenlivet.

you always get banned.

it's the same each time you have a whiff of the barmaid's apron.
 
Cobblers.

Often the vehemence of the posts is what is responded to.

You and Toggle were particularly active at that point.

The fact that you're both women had fuck all to do with it and I reckon you know that!

Why play the gender card?





<eyes up the cask strength Glenlivet>

I said that I thought it wasn't what I thought his intention was.
I am not playing the gender card. More making an observation.

Yes both Toggle and I were heavily involved in the thread but I don't think it was that venomous when you compare it to other people posting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom