I have heard bleats from Blair a few times today claiming it is not him that is delaying publication of the report. Smoke & fire ..
...
Sir John said that the Inquiry expected to soon receive the last responses from those criticised in the report, the so-called 'Maxwellisation' process.
Sir John Chilcot makes a statement responding to criticism of how long the Iraq War Inquiry has taken.
Didn't expect that. I wonder who he thinks he is apologising to?
Himself, for ever letting an enquiry begin.Didn't expect that. I wonder who he thinks he is apologising to?
It still bugs me that I spelled Chilcot wrong in the thread title, so long ago, but by the time I had realised it was too late to modify the title!
Only for a time, then that option no longer appears.Lol yeah when I searched for it to post the above link initially I couldn't find it because of the spelling. You can change the title using the 'Thread tools' button in the top right of the page
You joined in a war which didn't, need to be fought, planned and supplied it badly ,the aftermath was even worse. Sorry does not cut it.
Iraq Inquiry published 'in June or July 2016' Sir John Chilcot says - BBC News
Blimey, June or July next year. This report has taken longer than WWII!
Did it have to have Maxwellisation?
And he never even jumped a fence on a motorbike.Iraq Inquiry published 'in June or July 2016' Sir John Chilcot says - BBC News
Blimey, June or July next year. This report has taken longer than WWII!
He's just trying to tone down the criticism of him that he's already seen in the report.
The report will not state that he agreed to war long before EMDs or dodgy dossiers came about, those materialised to justify his decision. The report should state that he agreed to war to remove Saddam and lied to come up with a semi-legal basis for the war. Of course if the report did state that the door would be open for his prosecution for war crimes, but those laws only apply to black or swarthy folk and not to permataned people.
Blimey, I would have done it for half that!Sir John Chilcot will have been paid about £1230000 for this. Nice work, no wonder it's been dragged out.
Yes, that was a good article.
Thatcher's war was a simpler premise, the Argentinians had invaded British soil, she had only two options, roll over and accept it or take action. And as I understand it her military leaders were quite positive about taking action.The calculation Blair made was probably this: that if, as he assumed, the invasion of Iraq was successful and the aftermath provided a path to stability and democracy, then he would have been lauded. Thatcher had had a successful war and had reaped the benefits so he thought he could have too. The problem was that it was a complete mess, which was something that he didn't expect.
All true. Still, if the Iraq war had had a good outcome - as he expected - then he would have had a very good result.Thatcher's war was a simpler premise, the Argentinians had invaded British soil, she had only two options, roll over and accept it or take action. And as I understand it her military leaders were quite positive about taking action.
Blair had no need to invade Iraq, it did not threaten Britain in any cohesive way, his calculation was much less clear but I think he wanted to remain at the global table playing with the big boys.
The calculation Blair made was probably this: that if, as he assumed, the invasion of Iraq was successful and the aftermath provided a path to stability and democracy, then he would have been lauded. Thatcher had had a successful war and had reaped the benefits so he thought he could have too. The problem was that it was a complete mess, which was something that he didn't expect.
He should have seen that the plan to dismantle the Iraqi military and police (which he must have known about) would lead only to chaos and destruction.Well,he could have guessed it was going to be a mess when Rumsfeld threw away the development plans the US State Department and FCO had been working on (which Claire Short resigned over) before the invasion happened, instead he carried on saying it was in the UK interests to be involved as that way we could help shape things.
That was a fuckup decided on by Bremer (and possibly Cheney) after we had boots on the groundHe should have seen that the plan to dismantle the Iraqi military and police (which he must have known about) would lead only to chaos and destruction.