Yossarian said:Some of the tabloids seem to be going completely mental over the whole thing – “Let’s relentlessly hound and vilify these women for as long as possible, that’ll really ram home the message that bullying is wrong!”
Both Endemol AND Jo's agents issued statements (included in the GMTV report after the interview was shown) saying that they had offered her help and support - basically saying she was lying about not getting anything from them in that interview.exosculate said:That is horrible. This will have fizzled away in a few weeks, why don't endemol look after her properly?
ymu said:Both Endemol AND Jo's agents issued statements (included in the GMTV report after the interview was shown) saying that they had offered her help and support - basically saying she was lying about not getting anything from them in that interview.
Jo can't expect to come out and claim that it didn't happen "like that" when we saw it - classic playground bullying behaviour..
Isn't it wonderful how the tabloids are able to solve the problems of the many by crucifying the few :GIANT ROLLING EYES MELTING SOCKETS ICON:Yossarian said:Some of the tabloids seem to be going completely mental over the whole thing – “Let’s relentlessly hound and vilify these women for as long as possible, that’ll really ram home the message that bullying is wrong!”
it's not so much her behaviour i question in respect of the sincerity of the interview, its the interviewers. It didn't seem right to me.pk said:Just watched the second half of that O'Meara clip.
Fucking disgusting - Endemol/Channel 4 have a duty of care to that woman, and this is hopefully going to destroy those responsible for putting her into that state.
There's no way she's faking that, she's in utter shock, post-traumatic stress.
Right now my contempt is not for her or Danielle or Jade for that matter, it's for the hidden people who have said nothing and done nothing to resolve this issue - they've just left her out to dry.
pk said:I'd love to what constitutes "help and support" on Endemol's planet
rorymac said:Cheyne Walk
newbie said:what do you think they should be doing?
This thread has been full of people demanding something must be done. Now that the show has more or less played itself out, is there any consensus about what Endemol and/or channel 4 should have done differently at any stage?
what should have been done to protect Shilpa before or during it all kicking off?
what should have been done to discipline or punish the three young women while they were in the house?
should the Jackiey, Jade or Jo/Jack evictions have been handled differently?
and now that they're out the house and back with their families and professional PR teams, what should Endemol or C4 be doing to protect, help or support the women?
They have various psychs/media advisors etc on hand to debrief/prepare them once they're out. And it's not just Endemol - her agents also claim she's bullshitting about getting no support.pk said:I'd love to what constitutes "help and support" on Endemol's planet, with various programmes in 24 countries, I seriously doubt they give a flying fuck about what happens to a former S-Club Seven singer.
When Shilpa appealed for help/a voice of reason in the Big Row, she laughed in her face. She was practically rubbing her hands in glee whenever there was any tension mounting or Jade was going off on one. There was a lot of belittling bitching behind Shilpa's back - like claiming that Indians are thin because they undercook chicken and are always ill, and being disgusted at the idea of people eating with their hands. These comments did not come out of nowhere - they were part of the "bonding" against Shilpa.pk said:What exactly did "we" see from Jo specifically then?
Indeed, Shilpa was treated with a great deal more respect once Endemol/Channel 4 stepped in and told them that their behaviour wasn't going down well outside the house - a couple of days before Jade was evicted. Then Dirk started getting it in the neck, and Jo sat there rubbing her hands with glee and egging Cleo on, positively looking forward to the possibility of Dirk completely losing it if they harrassed him enough. Her behaviour was downright nasty throughout and it would probably do her a lot of good to realise exactly why people took such exception to it. Personally, I don't think it was the perceived racism as much as the blatant bullying and downright unpleasantness which hit a nerve for most people.pk said:Looks to me like there was a huge row with Jade, then Jade was ejected, and then left to their own devices they sorted it out like adults, without the manipulative interference of the Bermondsey beast coming down around them all like a fucking chavalanche.
They looked to be getting on fine before evictions began again.
You may or may not be uneducated, but opinionated ignorant bigoted fuck would appeared to sum you up nicely enough.pk said:But no, the great British public wanted their pound of flesh...
I have a sneaking suspicion that having poured all it's hate onto Jade to prove that they're not racist, the hordes of uneducated opinionated ignorant bigotted fucks that constitute the majority of Big Brother's viewing public turned on Jo because they'd lost their pikey princess, they'd destroyed the Jade Goody myth of working class girl done good, and they felt bereft of their hero, and that frustration manifested itself into further self-righteous hatred.
Good job she's not a paediatrician...
Bollocks. Jade and Jo and Danielle were all interviewed in the diary room prior to Jade's eviction, which gave them a very good idea of what was going on at that point. It was openly discussed in the house, including the fact that they were being accused of racism. In addition, and very unusually, Jo and Jack were taken out of the house before the break in the final show - so they were also out of the house for some time before they were interviewed, instead of being marched straight into the studio as is usual.pk said:They let it get to this situation deliberately, and have given no hint to Jo the depth of public feeling until now, unlike Jade who was warned, nay briefed, an hour before her interview.
ymu said:Bollocks. Jade and Jo and Danielle were all interviewed in the diary room prior to Jade's eviction, which gave them a very good idea of what was going on at that point. It was openly discussed in the house, including the fact that they were being accused of racism. In addition, and very unusually, Jo and Jack were taken out of the house before the break in the final show - so they were also out of the house for some time before they were interviewed, instead of being marched straight into the studio as is usual.
I knew there was something wrong there - thanks!Structaural said:Jo was evicted with Cleo a day before.
ymu said:Bollocks. Jade and Jo and Danielle were all interviewed in the diary room prior to Jade's eviction, which gave them a very good idea of what was going on at that point. It was openly discussed in the house, including the fact that they were being accused of racism. In addition, and very unusually, Jo and Jack were taken out of the house before the break in the final show - so they were also out of the house for some time before they were interviewed, instead of being marched straight into the studio as is usual.
Why was she taken out of the house an hour earlier than normal if it wasn't for some kind of briefing?pk said:Bullshit, they weren't briefed in the same way Jade was an hour before her interview with Davina.
I take it you're happy to see O'Meara in that state then?
Good for you. You've been successfully manipulated along with all the Sun reading vermin who are practically baying for her suicide then.
wishface said:To be fair to Jo, she was very insecure during her stay in the house, prone to panic attacks and anxiety also she reguarly made mention that she felt something was amiss with the situation.
Strange then that the tabloid interview over the weekend (which i havent read) found it very easily, apparently, to protray her in the worst way.
Maybe she really is distressed; once again the respnsibility lies with Endemol and C4, above all else. They are the real cultprits in this sordid affair.
wishface said:Strange then that the tabloid interview over the weekend (which i havent read) found it very easily, apparently, to protray her in the worst way.
Louloubelle said:I *heart* jermaine
Totally, he's a lovely man.
Yes she's racist but racism is eveywhere and we all have to check ourselves for it IMO. My disgust at Endemol grows by the day in this sorry affair
Racism or not, the state she was in, in that interview, was awful, and i feel compassion for her.
I hope that she's getting the support she needs to regain her mental health and I hope she gains the strength and internal resources that she needs to look in the mirror and see her racism and bullying, feel genuine remorse and guilt, and move on and grow to be a better person
Fair enough
It's quite clear to me that right now she doesn't have the sufficient internal resources to do this, but bullying her won't help things
Bullying never helps anything, making someone aware of their failings should never become bullying or an attempt to destroy someone.
ymu said:from what I can see, the Mirror interview just magnifies that attitude.
Agreed, on all counts.Louloubelle said:I hope that she's getting the support she needs to regain her mental health and I hope she gains the strength and internal resources that she needs to look in the mirror and see her racism and bullying, feel genuine remorse and guilt, and move on and grow to be a better person
It's quite clear to me that right now she doesn't have the sufficient internal resources to do this, but bullying her won't help things
seems like Jo needs better support staff and better management.pk said:Grant Hodgson And Nikhita Mahajan who did that Sunday Mirror hatchet job would find it very easy to spin a load of bollocks to discredit people.
Grant Hodgson is a fucking cunt, and it seems a bit of a sex pest - witness his expose on an innocent female student who must have been comparably upset with this:
http://www.cherwell.org/news/escort_service_targeted_by_journalists
And look at Mahajan's work on Russell Brand (a client of John Noel):
http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/news/tm_objectid=17174040&method=full&siteid=62484-name_page.html
Sure, it's easy for these tossers to portray anyone in a bad light, it's what they get paid for.