Given the searching and volatile international debate provoked by the programme C4 has done a good job, producing television which is highly 'relevant' and uniquely 'inventive.' So if those words really are contained in their charter and/or contract with the private production company, that’s an argument for C4 funding
more BB series even
better to fulfil its function.
But talk of C4 or the private company breaking charters, house rules etc is just another form of censorship. Rather than come straight out and demand state censorship of BB, a mealy-mouthed argument occurs about the small-print and whether alleged breaches of clause 5.2(b)(i) justifies censorship.
If the C4 charter or house rules or contractual arrangements or any other regulatory document have been breached that’s an argument for amending the document to remove the breach. Not censoring the show to enforce some bureaucrat’s wet dream.
Besides, the BB house rules
http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/B/bb6/footer/rules.html
contain nothing about racism or bullying. The only vaguely related rule is the instruction that participants avoid assaulting each other, to which Jade, surprisingly, managed to adhere.