Agent Sparrow said:Hang on, wasn't she the one who was horribly bullied in BB3?
Hell no. She and a girl called Adele viciously and systematically bullied a girl called Sophie. A much prettier girl by some strange coincidence.
Agent Sparrow said:Hang on, wasn't she the one who was horribly bullied in BB3?
I disagree - how could they not broadcast such despicable comments?wishface said:they should have not broadcast those comments where possible
I dunno, I wasn't in the country the first part. But when I started watching it when there were about 5 or 6 in the house Kate Lawler and co. were bullying her. And Kate won, which obviously shows you that bullying in someone considered more attractive is completely fine!Aravis said:Hell no. She and a girl called Adele viciously and systematically bullied a girl called Sophie. A much prettier girl by some strange coincidence.
Where will it all end?JADE: THE STINK OF HYPOCRISY
Race row star's scent is made in.. INDIA! Staff earn 14p an hour
JADE Goody is today exposed as a hypocrite who uses 14p-an-hour workers in India to make her perfume - while she earned £744 an hour hurling racial abuse at housemate Shilpa Shetty.
Jade 25 - evicted from Celebrity Big Brother after subjecting Bollywood beauty Shilpa to a string of insults - has pocketed more than £1 million from sales of her Shh... scent.
But it would take the workers who produce the perfume in India nearly FOUR WEEKS o earn enough to buy a single £20 bottle.
Last night Shilpa's sister Shamita, the first member of the Shetty family to criticise Jade, said: "Her perfume is made in India - she is a hypocrite."
One worker at the Pragati Glassworks in poverty-stricken Kharach, who asked not to be named to protect his job said: 'We were proud to be making a perfume for Jade back in Britain.
"But she is a racist and attacked our Shilpa who is like a princess to us. Jade is making money out of hundreds of Indians working for her."
Advertisement
Agent Sparrow said:I'd be interested to see how I'd be able to cope in the situation. I have a feeling that any darker aspects of my personality might have a greater chance of coming out.
When she is hung drawn and quartered with her head on a spike presumably (or at least the 21st century version).Rutita1 said:Oh dear....
Where will it all end?
Agent Sparrow said:I dunno, I wasn't in the country the first part. But when I started watching it when there were about 5 or 6 in the house Kate Lawler and co. were bullying her. And Kate won, which obviously shows you that bullying in someone considered more attractive is completely fine!
I dunno, aside from all of this, there's a part of me that would be quite interested seeing how I'd cope with the BB situation. Not that I would ever dream of going on the programme mind you! But in a version without the camera (or at least just for being shown your own feedback), I'd be interested to see how I'd be able to cope in the situation. I have a feeling that any darker aspects of my personality might have might a greater chance of coming out. Saying that I don't think I'd be a bully, but I can see how in that environment it gets more difficult to actually stand up to it, and things come out in different ways. I'm not sure I'd like all of what was played back to me.
Ok, i don't have a problem with that per se, but i still think they should have warned the bullies at the time properly rather than let it all carry on, and thus use it for the shows ratings. That may not have been their original intention when they stuck Jade in, maybe, but you can be sure that's what they are thinking now and over the past week.Orang Utan said:I disagree - how could they not broadcast such despicable comments?
just for clarity the she refferred to is jade not kate lawler who didn't bully anyone as far as i recall...Agent Sparrow said:I dunno, I wasn't in the country the first part. But when I started watching it when there were about 5 or 6 in the house Kate Lawler and co. were bullying her. And Kate won, which obviously shows you that bullying in someone considered more attractive is completely fine!
wishface said:Ok, i don't have a problem with that per se, but i still think they should have warned the bullies at the time properly rather than let it all carry on, and thus use it for the shows ratings. That may not have been their original intention when they stuck Jade in, maybe, but you can be sure that's what they are thinking now and over the past week.
I don't think that's true at allrocketman said:The message that comes from Channel 4 on this is that racism and bullying are acceptable in UK society.
Orang Utan said:I don't think that's true at all
i agree....i assume the ratings have been going up during the time that the tensions have risen in the house and so i think the message that comes across is that we just like to watch people bitching and arguing with each otherOrang Utan said:I don't think that's true at all
While it may be true that it has exploited bullying for ratings, I don't think that necessarily means that it condones it - if it happens in the house, it is C4's duty to show it and vile people are shown up to be the horrible people they are - how is that condoning racism and bullying?rocketman said:Don't you? Why not? By allowing this to take place, by screening it and by refusing to take positive action when this began to take place, Channel 4 has failed in its duty of care. And has effectively said such behaviour is alright.
What's your counter argument? A knee-jerk "I don't agree" argument isn't an argument without a thesis to back it up.
Orang Utan said:While it may be true that it has exploited bullying for ratings, I don't think that necessarily means that it condones it - if it happens in the house, it is C4's duty to show it and vile people are shown up to be the horrible people they are - how is that condoning racism and bullying?
Random One said:i agree....i assume the ratings have been going up during the time that the tensions have risen in the house and so i think the message that comes across is that we just like to watch people bitching and arguing with each other
i think the whole thing has gone fucking crazy i actually don't think it is as big a deal as it has been made to be... i don't think the bullying that has been going on in the big brother house is really any worse than what was going on with Sam in the 2006 bb and no one went fucking mental thenrocketman said:This has caused real emotional distress to many people. I fear your attitude here shows you up as complacent - presumably you don't understand the significance of images like this on prime time TV,
Though Dirk may have it right when he said: "At least we know the world doesn't have any serious problems."
But that's dealing with the media driven dialectic, I guess.
haylz said:Anyone remember the "fight night"....
It was BB with the gay guy who arfed like a seal and that bloke victor who thought he was tupac
That was a display of contemptuous bullying, homophobia and the rest and yet what happened?????
zip
I think that's true to a certain extent, yet I'm glad the nation got to saw that kind of stupidity that is all too common, yet is rarely depicted on telly.rocketman said:No it's not. If racist bullying takes place in the house, it's Channel 4's DUTY to nip it in the bud before - not after - it raises media attention globally and generates questions in the House of Commons.
It's been a cyncial manipulation of events to boost ratings on a flagging show and the "we're only reporting events" defence doesn't wash in a situation the channel is in control of. People in previous series have been instantaneously kicked out of the show for much, much less. This has been a cynical attempt to profit from racism and bullying.
Channel 4 has let the housemates down, the viewing public down, the country down.
I think that is unnecessary and patronisingrocketman said:This has caused real emotional distress to many people. I fear your attitude here shows you up as complacent - presumably you don't understand the significance of images like this on prime time TV,
Yossarian said:She's probably more Lee Bowyer's type anyway, racist twat that he is.
http://uk.askmen.com/toys/interview_200/224_danielle_lloyd_interview.htmlQ-3escribe how you fell in love with Teddy Sheringham? How did he seduce you?
He got me drunk (laughs). No, he’s just… he’s just, you know I’ve never met anybody like him before, he’s just like a real gentleman, he’s lovely. He’s just really sweet and he’d do anything for me. And I like the fact that he gives me my own independence; that I can go out with me friends and do whatever I want whenever and he can do exactly the same.
I met Ted when I was doing the Great Britain competition cos he was a judge, and then I think we just fell for each other straight away, like, we just seemed to have like a connection. And then afterward, we went to a party… the after-show party, and then we just got talking and that was it; we’ve just basically been together ever since. But I was still living in Liverpool back then and he was living in London, so then later I also moved to London and we just started spending more and more time together.
Q-4:What do you think it takes to make a healthy relationship?
Buying some sexy underwear. And then that’s just not for him, it’s for the girl as well. I always buy sexy underwear (giggles). Well, I like independence, I mean I like doing me own thing, and I think Ted likes the fact that, you know, he can go do his own thing then… we come home to each other and we trust each other. I’ve got my own place, but I spend a lot of time at Ted’s. Maybe like, when Ted goes away and plays football, I’ll probably go stay at me flat cos the house is too big for me to stay in by meself. I get scared.
Orang Utan said:I think that is unnecessary and patronising
Random One said:i think the whole thing has gone fucking crazy i actually don't think it is as big a deal as it has been made to be... i don't think the bullying that has been going on in the big brother house is really any worse than what was going on with Sam in the 2006 bb and no one went fucking mental then
and i'd rather you didn't tell me what i do and don't understand and make assumptions about my level of complacency
Orang Utan said:I think that is unnecessary and patronising
ZAMB said:The sad thing is that if they were to split up immediatiately after this show it would just compound the feeding frenzy in the press
rocketman said:Gathering these events together - and proving a pattern that has preceeded the current show - is an argument for tighter regulation of this life-destroying TV format
rocketman said:It is a big deal? Why? Because it became one
Random One said:and i think it is important to understand why it became one though...because if this was a normal BB i'm not sure (obviously i don't know) such a big deal would have been made...so do we/society only beleive celebs should be held accountable for their actions/words and not the 'ordinary' people who have been on bb before and often acted just as ignorantly...this annoys me
Random One said:i have a whole load of problems with what ive seen on CBB this year but it being shown was just not one of them, because sometimes i think it is necessary for things to be seen for a self-reflection/evaluation process to begin...although not sure that will happen properly
rocketman said:Yeah, the culture of celebrity is an odd one: the contrast in the house between two models of what celebrity can be is interesting. On the one hand you have the likes of Dirk, Germaine and Shilpa, who see their 'celebrity' as good reason to act with dignity, intelligence and respect - people who understand their dual role as humans first, and role models (of sorts) second. On the other side of the coin you have people with no understanding that they have a role beyond the human, (does this make sense?)
In a sense, anyone on TV has this dual role, celebs or not. I agree wholeheartedly (I hope I understand this correctly) that the other side of the media-driven reality vision is that celebs suddenly become more important than the rest of us; and think that's reprehensible in itself.
Random One said:yes u have understood correctly look i think my way of putting what i said was a bit wrong-i think i just felt patronised (as orang utan said) by what u said that was all ....i find it very hard to express what i mean through my writing i'd much rather talk in person! (i mean it took me 20 mins to write out that last post so that i expressed what I meant properly!!!)