Rushy
basically a scrotum
Are there any drawings showing the latest proposal (post consult)? I was also pretty heartened by how much they appeared to be listening to feedback - though there were not many folk there so it was almost one on one. What they have described with the cafe sounds like pretty much what I suggested too so that's great! I felt quite strongly that park visitors needed to be able to feel ownership of the grand ground floor rooms - combined cafe and non cafe sitting space. The house musn't be somewhere people get to wander around admiring it from outside and then shunted into a cafe in the corner. As long as access to the main ground floor rooms was available, public access to the rest of the building could be pretty limited and used for the events.Thanks for posting the update, though the possibility of moving the cafe out of the main building is no longer on the table.
I took part in the consultations in February and March and was quite heartened by how closely the design team was listening to input. I was one of several people who felt that putting the cafe within the walled stable yard was the wrong solution. The site demands maximum use be made of the grandest spaces and the excellent views.
The latest proposal keeps the cafe dining room in the main building, but moves it to the Picture Room, on the opposite side of the entrance hall. This allows the kitchen and toilets to be in the service wing, thereby freeing up all of the principal rooms on the ground floor in a way consistent with the original logic and architecture of the building.
I'll be interested to see how this is detailed in the planning application.