pressured the Planning Committee to reconsider and it was made abundantly clear that I MUST vote against Tescos or risk a personal surcharge.
My particular Tescos thing is about how they promised to have it in Streatham and suddenly it's there where the car park is, Tescos reneging on promises again, and the Market is suffering as a result. If Steve Bradley voted against this then my apology will indeed be grovelling.You don't need to be anti-rink to escape the charge of being "practically in bed with Tesco's". Sounds like an apology is in order to me (wouldn't expect you to grovel though).
What sort of vote is that, if you're not allowed to choose what you vote?
Anyway I meant to say earlier, fair play to you for coming on here and talking as a counsellor, Steve. I don't know much about you. I'm not a gossip like that frightful shifty one. you should watch her, you know.
My particular Tescos thing is about how they promised to have it in Streatham and suddenly it's there where the car park is, Tescos reneging on promises again, and the Market is suffering as a result. If Steve Bradley voted against this then my apology will indeed be grovelling.
We'll probably never find out now - you've scared him away.
hehIf that's all it takes then good riddance.
Yeah well these guys are on Planet Zog - Sir Peter Tapsell earlier asked the Prime Minister to round up the rioters and confine them to Wembley Stadium - citing as a precedent President Nixon's treatment of anti Vietnam protesters in Washington in 1971! These are the people who are governing us in Parliament - and you lot complain about Steve Bradley!Good. At least someone brought it up.
Yeah well these guys are on Planet Zog - Sir Peter Tapsell earlier asked the Prime Minister to round up the rioters and confine them to Wembley Stadium - citing as a precedent President Nixon's treatment of anti Vietnam protesters in Washington in 1971! These are the people who are governing us in Parliament - and you lot complain about Steve Bradley!
That's true - but back to plan A - We need Kate Bush and a Cloud Burster outside the Ritzy. The Orgone party launch would take them by storm!We gotta start somewhere and you'd think there's a better chance of having your meagre influence felt locally rather than on the national level.
That's true - but back to plan A - We need Kate Bush and a Cloud Burster outside the Ritzy. The Orgone party launch would take them by storm!
Do the Ritzy take requests? I haven't seen the original version of WR since 1970 at the Academy in Oxford Street. The Channel 4 version had goldfish obscuring the naughty bits.Free and bloody hard orgasms to the people!
No it was Yugoslav. Dyllis Powell (Sunday Times critic at the time) went nuts over it.Which one - that Czech movie?
N
No it was Yugoslav. Dyllis Powell (Sunday Times critic at the time) went nuts over it.
See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W.R.:_Mysteries_of_the_Organism
Er... Are we still discussing Brixton violence...?
She voted it film of the year. One of the things that was appealing at the time was that it infuriated the (communist) authorities. Yugoslav troops massed when it was shown at a film festival in Trieste. Of course the US were equally displeased with it.That's the one. Nuts in a good way? And story, not really.