I think some people might have forgotten how crap Windrush Square used to be, with bollards and fences and so on, and sliced up by roads. Most people think it was an improvement. Let's see what these new bollards are like.
Before, and now:
View attachment 222705View attachment 222706
Your not getting the point.
The design of Windrush square was heavily influenced by Secured by Design.
This has affected planning proposals in LJ.
Your pictures are selective.
Im talking about the whole square.
Outside the Tate Library for example there was a really nice fountain that went when the land was revamped. Council said it was to expensive to upkeep.
The space outside the Ritzy and Tate Library was very run down and not what it was in its glory days. ( believe
editor has done some history on this).
Placing bollards around the Windrush square should not be lets see what these bollards are like. Thats crap. Changes to Windrush square, which is public space should go through planning.
Planning is hardly perfect system. But at least its some democratic say in ones environment.
What you are saying is I should shut up and wait to see what its like.
Im not going to do that.
I also think as i keep saying urban design is not value free problem solving.
Its bound up with politics.
The "wait and see" attitude is trying to be neutral . Which is not neutral in practise.
There is no justiification for fortifications around Windrush square imo.
Money would be better spent maintaining it properly. Its been poorly maintained since it was finished.