Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton news, rumours and general chat

I was just walking my dog on Bonham Rd and this friendly little chap ran across the road to say hello. There was no owner around and no collar. As I had my dog with me, I reluctantly I left him there. This was just before 6pm on Thurs. He looked well fed and didn't look distressed, I'm hoping he just popped out of his garden and went back, but could not tell. My wife has just gone out again to have another lookIMG_20200416_180617.jpg
 
Sat night in Brixton:

In photos: Saturday night in lockdown Brixton, 18th April 2020


In photos: Saturday night in lockdown Brixton, 18th April 2020


In photos: Saturday night in lockdown Brixton, 18th April 2020


In photos: Saturday night in lockdown Brixton, 18th April 2020


 
The council has put signs in Windrush Sq saying 'No Sitting'. They seem to work - the cat and I had the whole square to ourselves for half an hour. No dealers, not even in Rushcroft Road. No homeless guy on the library steps. No drinkers on the seats. I'm not convinced the signs comply with the new list of Reasonable Excuses issued by plod on the 16th. But anyway. The cat and I enjoyed having a sit on the chairs, watching the world go by. I wonder what the procedure is for challenging a fine? Do you go to court, or a tribunal, or what? Not that I want to find out, but it's as well to know the risk one is taking, when sitting down in a park.

Eta: the list of reasonable excuses is here: https://www.college.police.uk/What-we-do/COVID-19/Documents/What-constitutes-a-reasonable-excuse.pdf. It was issued on the easter weekend and has not been revised as I implied above. But it's news to some police officers who were enforcing the law incorrectly. It doesn't say 'no sitting'. It says "Stopping to rest or to eat lunch while on a long walk' is 'likely to be reasonable', and 'A short walk to a park bench, when the person remains seated for a much longer period' is 'Not likely to be reasonable'.

The Lambeth signs also say that dogs must be on a lead. There's nothing about that in the new Coronavirus law and I think it's reckless and stupid to say it in the context of the virus - it can only help the scare stories that pets are at risk of spreading the virus. Next thing you know, people will be abandoning their pets.
 
Last edited:
I see the premises used by Fujiyama Brixton have been taken over by the Advocacy Academy

What? The Advocacy Academy is a transformational Social Justice Youth Organising Movement for young people from South London who are passionate about creating a more fair, just and equal society. It’s the only one of its kind in the UK, but follows in the footsteps of a long line of youth movements who have changed the world.

Why? For generations young people have been leading the struggle against injustice and inequality. Our voices are needed now more than ever. It’s no secret that mainstream politics doesn’t represent or reflect us, so it’s up to us to change things for ourselves.

We will not be inheriting this mess. We will be fixing it.

How?
The Advocacy Academy is home to the most radical, creative, and powerful youth-led campaigning in the country. Our calendar of programmes range in length from a few days to six months, and cover topics from intersectional feminism (The Sisterhood Academy) to racial equality (The Freedom Fellowship), and almost every issue in between. No matter what social justice programme you’re on, you’ll be trained to make real and lasting change, like the Advocates who came before you - they’ve convinced Lambeth Council to divest from fossil-fuels, secured genuinely affordable homes for local families, sparked a national debate on black representation in the media, convinced KCL to become the first University in the country to collect data on their Latin American students and won a BAFTA for a film on colourism - all before finishing school



The building was on sale for £2.1m

 
They have been there a while. Part of 'We the People' documentary was filmed there last summer and there was a screening there with q&a with some of the young people involved. Inspiring young activists.

We The People Film Screening at The Advocacy Academy

date
Thursday, November 7, 2019 from 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM (GMT)
date
The Advocacy Academy
7 Vining Street
London SW9 8QA
United Kingdom
Organized by We The People


map

 
The council has put signs in Windrush Sq saying 'No Sitting'. They seem to work - the cat and I had the whole square to ourselves for half an hour. No dealers, not even in Rushcroft Road. No homeless guy on the library steps. No drinkers on the seats. I'm not convinced the signs comply with the new list of Reasonable Excuses issued by plod on the 16th. But anyway. The cat and I enjoyed having a sit on the chairs, watching the world go by. I wonder what the procedure is for challenging a fine? Do you go to court, or a tribunal, or what? Not that I want to find out, but it's as well to know the risk one is taking, when sitting down in a park.

Eta: the list of reasonable excuses is here: https://www.college.police.uk/What-we-do/COVID-19/Documents/What-constitutes-a-reasonable-excuse.pdf. It was issued on the easter weekend and has not been revised as I implied above. But it's news to some police officers who were enforcing the law incorrectly. It doesn't say 'no sitting'. It says "Stopping to rest or to eat lunch while on a long walk' is 'likely to be reasonable', and 'A short walk to a park bench, when the person remains seated for a much longer period' is 'Not likely to be reasonable'.

The Lambeth signs also say that dogs must be on a lead. There's nothing about that in the new Coronavirus law and I think it's reckless and stupid to say it in the context of the virus - it can only help the scare stories that pets are at risk of spreading the virus. Next thing you know, people will be abandoning their pets.

Well - youngest child is a bit scared of dogs. One ran up and jumped on her the other day and owner had to come right up and pull (cute and friendly) dog away - thus coming within inches of all of us. Wouldn’t have happened with a lead ... personally I love dogs, but they are not always predictable.
 
The council has put signs in Windrush Sq saying 'No Sitting'. They seem to work - the cat and I had the whole square to ourselves for half an hour. No dealers, not even in Rushcroft Road. No homeless guy on the library steps. No drinkers on the seats. I'm not convinced the signs comply with the new list of Reasonable Excuses issued by plod on the 16th. But anyway. The cat and I enjoyed having a sit on the chairs, watching the world go by. I wonder what the procedure is for challenging a fine? Do you go to court, or a tribunal, or what? Not that I want to find out, but it's as well to know the risk one is taking, when sitting down in a park.

Eta: the list of reasonable excuses is here: https://www.college.police.uk/What-we-do/COVID-19/Documents/What-constitutes-a-reasonable-excuse.pdf. It was issued on the easter weekend and has not been revised as I implied above. But it's news to some police officers who were enforcing the law incorrectly. It doesn't say 'no sitting'. It says "Stopping to rest or to eat lunch while on a long walk' is 'likely to be reasonable', and 'A short walk to a park bench, when the person remains seated for a much longer period' is 'Not likely to be reasonable'.

The Lambeth signs also say that dogs must be on a lead. There's nothing about that in the new Coronavirus law and I think it's reckless and stupid to say it in the context of the virus - it can only help the scare stories that pets are at risk of spreading the virus. Next thing you know, people will be abandoning their pets.
I walked through about three in the afternoon today and it was a bit like old times by the bus stop. I didn't see any drinking, but it was the normal types - older black men and women being social. Actually I can't see the harm in that - they weren't forcing themselves on anyone else.

Frankly there might come a time when you are getting old that it seems better to risk some time with your mates that die in solitary confinement.
 
So how does this work then? For over 25 years the water has been included in my rent. British Water (or whoever the fuck they are) tell the council they want to charge for it separately and - bam! - I'm handed a £330 annual bill with no reduction in rent. :mad:
 
So how does this work then? For over 25 years the water has been included in my rent. British Water (or whoever the fuck they are) tell the council they want to charge for it separately and - bam! - I'm handed a £330 annual bill with no reduction in rent. :mad:
Regardless of our mutual ignore.
‘British Water’ is a trade association and shouldn’t be charging you directly. Thames Water supplies all properties within a large boundary. It is possible that given Lambeth housing is a major account this could be transferred to another wholesaler but I can’t find anything online to this effect. You certainly shouldn’t be hit with something like that without any kind of warning. Can you give more specific detail about the communication you received? I may be able to shed some light.
 
That's the bill for the year. Get them to set up a monthly direct debit to make it more manageable. Your housing was likely including the water in the total overall (usually called eligible charge/s as an umbrella term) of rent + various service charges, so they should deduct the water from the total overall although the amount billed as rent may not change, but it'll be something like a quid a week difference.

Depending on your financial situation you might be eligible for the WaterSure plus scheme that will half the bill. It's a one page form, which is easily found online including the eligability criteria. (There are 2 schemes, WaterSure and WaterSure plus, one is based on health needs and one on income and finances).
 
Last edited:
I've never been able to understand my Thames Water charges. So many times they've hit me with large unexpected bills, other times they've given me rebates. They once sent me significant sums of money for disruptions to supply when I had no recollection of being disrupted. Plus they've stolen hours of my life in traffic round the Norwood Road.

They're a private monopoly who try to outsource as much as possible and invest as little in London as possible.

If you can avoid dealing with Thames Water, I'd give them the widest berth imaginable.
 
I've never been able to understand my Thames Water charges. So many times they've hit me with large unexpected bills, other times they've given me rebates. They once sent me significant sums of money for disruptions to supply when I had no recollection of being disrupted. Plus they've stolen hours of my life in traffic round the Norwood Road.

They're a private monopoly who try to outsource as much as possible and invest as little in London as possible.

If you can avoid dealing with Thames Water, I'd give them the widest berth imaginable.
I went to a focus group awayday thingy with Thames Water about three years ago - near the Elephant and Castle.
This was an all-day event, 10 am to 3 pm or so - nice lunch provided.
There were about 80-100 of us in tables - as in "Your New Lambeth" planning exercises.
The difference was Thames Water paid - I think it was £80. Lambeth never pay people who volunteer their time to have their views on planning ignored.

Anyway what it came down to was this - the government of the time was proposing to make Thames Water charges dependent on service improvements - such as if the amount of leaks went down etc.

I can't recall anyone being enthusiastic to allow charges to go up - and I think someone even had the temerity to ask that directors bonuses should be cut!
 
So how does this work then? For over 25 years the water has been included in my rent. British Water (or whoever the fuck they are) tell the council they want to charge for it separately and - bam! - I'm handed a £330 annual bill with no reduction in rent. :mad:

You shoud have got a letter from Council about rent and charge for this year. Rent has increased but water charges have been removed.

I have applied for a payment card and monthly payments I can do at a paypoint. Its on the Thames Water website. I do it online.

 
You shoud have got a letter from Council about rent and charge for this year. Rent has increased but water charges have been removed.

I have applied for a payment card and monthly payments I can do at a paypoint. Its on the Thames Water website. I do it online.

Yes - the rent went up a small amount FFS :(
 
So how does this work then? For over 25 years the water has been included in my rent. British Water (or whoever the fuck they are) tell the council they want to charge for it separately and - bam! - I'm handed a £330 annual bill with no reduction in rent. :mad:

that’s the same amount as we pay For our water bill for a 3 bedroom house with a garden! How can it be the same for a flat (I assume it’s for a flat)
 
Back
Top Bottom