Nonsense. People get judged (often quite harshly) on the basis of something they say, something they choose to eat or drink, where they choose to live. When nothing is known about their background, income, political views. I find that odd.
And newsflash, there are LOTS of people that know *nothing* about the Ritzy protests. And why should they know anything about it? They don't represent the very vocal (and probably relatively small) minority here, and presumably have lots of other things going on in their lives. Not everybody can give a shit about everything you give a shit about. That's not to say they don't or wouldn't care if they did know about it. Or perhaps they do know about it and have weighed up the evidence and decided its somebody else's struggle. You have no idea what they think. And so painting people as not caring is a total fallacy.
Oh, and you're mistaking 'having a considered opinion' for 'stirring the pot'. You're always banging on about ad hominems; you're far from innocent in that yourself.