Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton news, rumours and general chat - Sept 2013

Status
Not open for further replies.
But what do they actually mean? 'Opportunties for regeneration by waitrose'?

The regeneration is well underway, thankfully, and we don't really need waitrose to rubber stamp it.
 
In case anyone's missed it,
Grumpy-old-man.jpg

Editor, upon hearing the shouts of young drunken people with funny clothes on the street outside his flat

Editor, upon meeting a "coked up" person in a nightclub in the small hours

Editor, upon finding graffiti in a pub toilet

etc

etc

etc
 
Regeneration sounds much nicer than vibrant. I love Waitrose. :cool::cool::cool:

Edit: The corner of Acre Lane and King's Avenue is the only vacant spot that springs to mind. Failing that, aren't the co-operative council looking to sell of some of their buildings on lower Brixton Hill? Not that the latter would happen any time soon.
What about the bit of Brixton Square which just got turned down for conversion to residential? Handy for Editor too.
 
The Breadroom at 29 Market Row has changed hands. Christian has sold it and got a job as a tour guide. The new owner is William, who already owns The Provincial at 21 Market Row. He's applying for an alcohol licence and will change the Breadroom into something else.
 
But they shouldn't be binned with the packaging. They should be fit for purpose. We should have a campaign to have them banned. The last time I suggested this everyone still seemed determined to blame the people bought them in good faith that they would, you know, do what they are meant to do, rather than the manufacturers.

Should they be unfit for purpose then I would suggest the purchaser of the offending headphones take this up with the manufacturer or retailer, and find themselves some that are fit for purpose, rather than inflicting the failings of their tinny apparatus on the rest of us.
 
I heard they were going to knock down the Albert and build an eleven storey Waitrose there.
I heard they were going to create a bridge of luxury apartments linking the rebuilt Albert development with the 'inspired by Brixton' block that's replacing the Canterbury, so high flyers will be able to avoid any potential interaction with 'edgy' Coldharbour Lane.
 
I heard they were going to create a bridge of luxury apartments linking the rebuilt Albert development with the 'inspired by Brixton' block that's replacing the Canterbury, so high flyers will be able to avoid any potential interaction with 'edgy' Coldharbour Lane.

:D
 
Should they be unfit for purpose then I would suggest the purchaser of the offending headphones take this up with the manufacturer or retailer, and find themselves some that are fit for purpose, rather than inflicting the failings of their tinny apparatus on the rest of us.


Why would they? They're perfectly happy with their purchase.
 
I heard they were going to create a bridge of luxury apartments linking the rebuilt Albert development with the 'inspired by Brixton' block that's replacing the Canterbury, so high flyers will be able to avoid any potential interaction with 'edgy' Coldharbour Lane.

Yes, that's right. It was approved by Lambeth Council in 2009 and it's being put out for public consultation at the start of next year. Of course, you'll be able to complain about the proposed development - just enter your objections into the feedback form on the website, at a very reasonable cost of £5 per word. All complaints will be processed when they ceremoniously burn the old Bradys building to the ground.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom