editor
hiraethified
Why "idiotic"?I'm not angry. Just think it was an idiotic post. Takes a lot more than that, my friend.
Have you read that article yet?
Why "idiotic"?I'm not angry. Just think it was an idiotic post. Takes a lot more than that, my friend.
Perhaps you'll find this one easier to read. It's quite interesting too.I had a cursory glance. Terrible UX on that site makes it quite difficult.
Street art – as well as its artistic forebear graffiti – are often thought of as radical, rebellious aesthetic practices. Both the artists and their works are portrayed as the very definition of “edgy”; dangerous and dissident, but also creative and avant-garde. Yet within the last five years or so, street art (and I use this term here in distinction to graffiti) has been commandeered by the corporate interests of the “creative city”.
The creative city doctrine is one in which public space is privatised and monetised – used as a simple means to an end. As imagined by superstar urban theorists such as Richard Florida, it is the role of city authorities to draw the emerging creative class to their sites. They must mark themselves out visually and recreationally, to entice the key demographic of well-educated professionals and “bohemians” (the coders, the designers, the “knowledge-based” professionals) who form the basis for a post-industrial economy.
From dissident to decorative: why street art sold out and gentrified our cities
You are aware that street art isn't supposed to last forever?Why couldn't the person who defaced the octopus artwork have just chosen a blank wall to make their point? What's the point of destroying someone else's work?
Oh Jeez. I give up. Please go off and learn the history of the Nuclear Dawn artwork and the difference between commissioned art and street art/graffiti.
Funding for the mural came from the Arts Council, the Gulbenkian Foundation and the Greater London Arts Association. An additional £2,000 grant for the artists came from the Lambeth Council in the form of the Inner City Partnership fund which caused great upset to one of Lambeth’s Tory Councillors who saw it as a waste of money.
The mural was finished in 1981 and on 11th February, opened by Hugh Jenkins, the then president for the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.
Oh Jeez. I give up. Please go off and learn the history of the Nuclear Dawn artwork and the difference between commissioned art and street art.
There's certainly some interesting arguments to be had on the relationship between street art and gentrification - and the differences between street art and commissioned artworks - but he's clearly not actually interested in the topic.Reiabuzz is too busy trying to pick a fight with you to waste his (her?) time reading up on stuff.
Ah, I see you're ramping up the personal abuse now. Kindly stop.Not trying to pick a fight, just pointing out absurd hypocrisy when I see it. If you weren't too busy wedging your tongue firmly up editor's posterior you might actually see that.
Anyone know what kind of gun that is? It looks well fearsome!View attachment 100526 blimey. Also a giant haul of knives handed in anonymously. Lambeth police twitter quite interesting.
Ah, I see you're ramping up the personal abuse now. Kindly stop.
Not trying to pick a fight, just pointing out absurd hypocrisy when I see it. If you weren't too busy wedging your tongue firmly up editor's posterior you might actually see that.
Not sure exactly. It would take up some pavement space of course, and need to be powered electrically.thank you for that
a quick scan suggests the proposed site is on the street outside pop
anyone got any ideas why it would not be allowed under planning rules?
(sorry, meant to reply to Editor)View attachment 100526 blimey. Also a giant haul of knives handed in anonymously. Lambeth police twitter quite interesting.
I thought I'd recognised it from one of The Terminator films, and it seems it did indeed feature in one of them judging by the nickname of the gunAnyone know what kind of gun that is? It looks well fearsome!
A reminder:
Not sure exactly. It would take up some pavement space of course, and need to be powered electrically.
Maybe there are health and safety issues over an unattended street fridge in central Brixton? Without an officer report (which would have been appended if it was either refused or approved) we cannot say.
Oh so his message was ironic?The over-daubing in Hackney was done by someone who's a street / conceptual artist himself, so it's all a bit meta really.
I wonder if he's a long term resident there or one of the artists who moved in a while back and made the area trendy.
Here's some more of his work
Edwin
never mind ehHaven't been able to find out who the octopus mural was by, and when/why it was painted.
just near emma street by mare street there was a piece of graffiti from c.1987 - black and white unite and fight, smash the national front - and flyposting from the 1990s (some of which is still there). some wankers whitewashed over the graffiti last year for a photoshoot.Not Brixton (this was in Hackney Wick) but the message is absolutely spot on.
View attachment 100521