Are they actually local residents ?
According to an anti LTN commentator on Buzz, the slow speed of buses in London is entirely down to LTNs.
She hasn't managed to produce any proof for this claim, but it must be true because LTNs.
Local event celebrates the use of cargo bikes for the school run
Have you noticed a new type of bike whooshing past? It may have a couple of kids tucked in a bucket at the front, or holding on at the back? Maybe a pet dog or a pile of flat packed flowers? If so,…www.brixtonbuzz.com
Hey, how do you think Trump got in?
It was shared in the Lambeth wide anti-LTN WhatsApp group. They're also claiming Fenstanton & Holy Trinity primary schools closing down is because of the Tulse Hill LTN!!
That's ShimanoSteve of onelambeth etcAccording to an anti LTN commentator on Buzz, the slow speed of buses in London is entirely down to LTNs.
She hasn't managed to produce any proof for this claim, but it must be true because LTNs.
Local event celebrates the use of cargo bikes for the school run
Have you noticed a new type of bike whooshing past? It may have a couple of kids tucked in a bucket at the front, or holding on at the back? Maybe a pet dog or a pile of flat packed flowers? If so,…www.brixtonbuzz.com
Sheila?That's ShimanoSteve of onelambeth etc
The tool on this site lets you look at performance of individual routes. The ones I’ve looked at which use a load of LTN boundary roads seem to be improved since the LTNs went in.According to an anti LTN commentator on Buzz, the slow speed of buses in London is entirely down to LTNs.
She hasn't managed to produce any proof for this claim, but it must be true because LTNs.
Local event celebrates the use of cargo bikes for the school run
Have you noticed a new type of bike whooshing past? It may have a couple of kids tucked in a bucket at the front, or holding on at the back? Maybe a pet dog or a pile of flat packed flowers? If so,…www.brixtonbuzz.com
What site is this please?The tool on this site lets you look at performance of individual routes. The ones I’ve looked at which use a load of LTN boundary roads seem to be improved since the LTNs went in.
View attachment 450716
View attachment 450715
View attachment 450714
View attachment 450713
The problem with this approach is that the park or fine income simply replaces historic spending, rather than being incremental to it. But in that way, it does fund other services which cannot raise their own income instead of going where it was intended.
Residents are reporting back that seating has been placed to face the shops and beds left unplanted with signs to grow whatever you want, which was not in the original plans. The general consensus is left looking unfinished.
The projected costs for this project are coming to us as one million. I hope this is for other areas too!
Personally for a million I would rather see clean streets and less cutting of services to vulnerable families. To me Lambeth's priorities seem crazy.
Moved from Brixton chat postIs there not a pedestrianised area? I haven't followed the plans but assumed that they were making a little pedestrianised shopping area.
Which is why the benches facing the shops seemed strange to me.
I live nearby and am part of a local group chat that includes a few roads including Elm Park, their residents commented. I did say it was what I had heard.Moved from Brixton chat post
Who are these un-named residents? where are they commenting? Amongst whom are these views a 'consensus'? What makes you think their views are representative of of locals (as you don't seem to live there?)
The plans are here: Tulse Hill Low Traffic Neighbourhood. (I googled for "Elm Park LTN plans" - perhaps you should have done that before commenting on a scheme you seem to have some ill informed third hand information about)
It looks unfinished because it IS unfinished - like every other scheme theres a gap between the build contractors and it being planted. and it probably needs to be planted at the right time of year. I'm not a gardener - do you plant stuff at the start of winter or in spring?
Despite being repeated vandalised (the trees were broken off twice, it was driven over, plants were stolen) and all the naysaying of the usual suspects, Shakespeare Road looked wonderful over the summer -
View attachment 451548
Fair enough - maybe you can go back and correct the people who misinformed you.I live nearby and am part of a local group chat that includes a few roads including Elm Park, their residents commented. I did say it was what I had heard.
Yes maybe I should have been more informed but I was happy to have these queries put right. I do think it looks nice, or will once it's finished. I actually thought the point was to make it nicer to pedestrianise it, which would have been better imo.
My issues lie with Lambeth spending and upkeep. Now people have said this is not coming out of social care budgets, which are still experiencing ongoing and savage cuts, I have no worry about Lambeth misspending, a phenomenon not unknown at all.
So what's your issue, I should have been more informed? Well isn't part of the message board's remit to clarify and correct information.
I can.Fair enough - maybe you can go back and correct the people who misinformed you.
Tbh they didn't misinform as such, they had the figures for the work and no information about where the money came from. So while I can set them right, that was a query we all had.Fair enough - maybe you can go back and correct the people who misinformed you.