Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton Liveable Neighbourhood and LTN schemes - improvements for pedestrians and cyclists

Feel someone should tell whoever’s behind this website how to write a headline.

 
According to an anti LTN commentator on Buzz, the slow speed of buses in London is entirely down to LTNs.

She hasn't managed to produce any proof for this claim, but it must be true because LTNs.

 
there doesn't seem any correlation between boroughs that have put in a lot of LTNs and cycleways and those that have done nothing. the biggest falls are definitely in boroughs that have done next to nothing.

I reckon bigger cars is probably the main issues if seeing slower speeds without increase in traffic or other changes. And measures to make the place safer for pedestrians will have an impact as well - more crossings and longer crossing times are going to slow average trips times a bit. And 20mph will have had some impact.



Screenshot 2024-11-08 at 08.46.25.png
 
Last edited:
If an average bus speed of say 10mph drops by 8% that means it becomes 9.2mph.
A 4 mile (eg Brixton to central London) bus journey at 10mph would take 24 minutes and a 4 mile bus journey at 9.2mph would take 26 minutes.
Just to keep things in proportion - regardless of the cause.
 
According to an anti LTN commentator on Buzz, the slow speed of buses in London is entirely down to LTNs.

She hasn't managed to produce any proof for this claim, but it must be true because LTNs.

😆

It was shared in the Lambeth wide anti-LTN WhatsApp group. They're also claiming Fenstanton & Holy Trinity primary schools closing down is because of the Tulse Hill LTN!!
 
According to an anti LTN commentator on Buzz, the slow speed of buses in London is entirely down to LTNs.

She hasn't managed to produce any proof for this claim, but it must be true because LTNs.

That's ShimanoSteve of onelambeth etc
 
According to an anti LTN commentator on Buzz, the slow speed of buses in London is entirely down to LTNs.

She hasn't managed to produce any proof for this claim, but it must be true because LTNs.

The tool on this site lets you look at performance of individual routes. The ones I’ve looked at which use a load of LTN boundary roads seem to be improved since the LTNs went in.

(Edited to add link)
IMG_4152.jpeg
IMG_4153.jpeg
IMG_4154.jpeg
IMG_4155.jpeg
 
Last edited:


The problem with this approach is that the park or fine income simply replaces historic spending, rather than being incremental to it. But in that way, it does fund other services which cannot raise their own income instead of going where it was intended.

Yes, it may well just substitute for previous spending and not be incremental but it doesn't feel like thats completely the case in Lambeth as their transport and kerbside work seems greater than other boroughs - they're self funding stuff while other boroughs remain reliant on TfL. Anything that is a substitute frees up more money for other services - which is exactly what Nagapie seemed to be asking for.


Screenshot 2024-11-18 at 15.25.57.png
 
Residents are reporting back that seating has been placed to face the shops and beds left unplanted with signs to grow whatever you want, which was not in the original plans. The general consensus is left looking unfinished.

The projected costs for this project are coming to us as one million. I hope this is for other areas too!

Personally for a million I would rather see clean streets and less cutting of services to vulnerable families. To me Lambeth's priorities seem crazy.

Is there not a pedestrianised area? I haven't followed the plans but assumed that they were making a little pedestrianised shopping area.
Which is why the benches facing the shops seemed strange to me.
Moved from Brixton chat post

Who are these un-named residents? where are they commenting? Amongst whom are these views a 'consensus'? What makes you think their views are representative of of locals (as you don't seem to live there?)

The plans are here: Tulse Hill Low Traffic Neighbourhood. (I googled for "Elm Park LTN plans" - perhaps you should have done that before commenting on a scheme you seem to have some ill informed third hand information about)

It looks unfinished because it IS unfinished - like every other scheme theres a gap between the build contractors and it being planted. and it probably needs to be planted at the right time of year. I'm not a gardener - do you plant stuff at the start of winter or in spring?

Despite being repeated vandalised (the trees were broken off twice, it was driven over, plants were stolen) and all the naysaying of the usual suspects, Shakespeare Road looked wonderful over the summer -
IMG_3185.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Moved from Brixton chat post

Who are these un-named residents? where are they commenting? Amongst whom are these views a 'consensus'? What makes you think their views are representative of of locals (as you don't seem to live there?)

The plans are here: Tulse Hill Low Traffic Neighbourhood. (I googled for "Elm Park LTN plans" - perhaps you should have done that before commenting on a scheme you seem to have some ill informed third hand information about)

It looks unfinished because it IS unfinished - like every other scheme theres a gap between the build contractors and it being planted. and it probably needs to be planted at the right time of year. I'm not a gardener - do you plant stuff at the start of winter or in spring?

Despite being repeated vandalised (the trees were broken off twice, it was driven over, plants were stolen) and all the naysaying of the usual suspects, Shakespeare Road looked wonderful over the summer -
View attachment 451548
I live nearby and am part of a local group chat that includes a few roads including Elm Park, their residents commented. I did say it was what I had heard.

Yes maybe I should have been more informed but I was happy to have these queries put right. I do think it looks nice, or will once it's finished. I actually thought the point was to make it nicer to pedestrianise it, which would have been better imo.

My issues lie with Lambeth spending and upkeep. Now people have said this is not coming out of social care budgets, which are still experiencing ongoing and savage cuts, I have no worry about Lambeth misspending, a phenomenon not unknown at all.

So what's your issue, I should have been more informed? Well isn't part of the message board's remit to clarify and correct information.
 
I live nearby and am part of a local group chat that includes a few roads including Elm Park, their residents commented. I did say it was what I had heard.

Yes maybe I should have been more informed but I was happy to have these queries put right. I do think it looks nice, or will once it's finished. I actually thought the point was to make it nicer to pedestrianise it, which would have been better imo.

My issues lie with Lambeth spending and upkeep. Now people have said this is not coming out of social care budgets, which are still experiencing ongoing and savage cuts, I have no worry about Lambeth misspending, a phenomenon not unknown at all.

So what's your issue, I should have been more informed? Well isn't part of the message board's remit to clarify and correct information.
Fair enough - maybe you can go back and correct the people who misinformed you.
 
Fair enough - maybe you can go back and correct the people who misinformed you.
Tbh they didn't misinform as such, they had the figures for the work and no information about where the money came from. So while I can set them right, that was a query we all had.
I don't know why they cared about the chairs facing in if it's not pedestrianised, that's probably just one or two people being particular.
 
Back
Top Bottom