chowce5382
Active Member
You writing this is probably the definition of ironyMan - I’d forgotten what disingenuous, self-righteous dicks you get on forums sometimes.
You writing this is probably the definition of ironyMan - I’d forgotten what disingenuous, self-righteous dicks you get on forums sometimes.
You've been judged on your own & your organisations actions and words.I’ve tried to be utterly genuine with you since the very beginning on this forum. You have chosen to see my every reason for supporting Sofia as being disingenuous. People think we have a huge backer, that we have a big PR company working for us and the One groups are just a front for this one company. Every time I’ve told you the actual truth you’ve chosen not to give the benefit of the doubt that this might actually be about disabled rights and that the team who are running this is mainly female, and mainly have disabled relatives. I’ve even been referred to as being one of a group of “motor cunts”. This small bit of ribbing is fair game.
It really has backfired on you though - the photos of your friends vandalism has just caused a massive dent in the anti LTN cause.Anyway, it’s been great fun winding you up for part of the morning.
For the record, this is obviously vandalism, I condemn it and it’s dangerous but it’s been fun to see how people like Backrow react to a bit of their own medicine in terms of being wound up.
Not my friend and I have no idea who has done this. Apparently it’s cabbies, I have nothing to do with them. The vandalism isn’t funny, what is amusing is that if I had said that it was cabbies, without having any evidence, you would have all agreed with me straight away as it would have confirmed your position. You would have agreed with without me having any evidence for my assertion. If I had then said that I didn’t have evidence for this I doubt very much we would see the same level of righteousness indignation as we do now. You’re upset because of who I said it could be, not that I wouldn’t have had any evidence either way.It really has backfired on you though - the photos of your friends vandalism has just caused a massive dent in the anti LTN cause.
The planters are now likely to be replaced or rebuilt with concrete and cameras. That trial will now go on for longer. It will cost all of us - as taxpayers - money.
What do you think Rook Irwin Sweeney will think of you?
If this is about people with disabilities- why does pouring a waste product that causes pollution and affects people with disabilities become a laughing matter to you?
That’s a pretty simple concept to grasp hold ofI’ve no idea what you are talking about and I suspect nor do you.
Lots of ifs in there. What's not an if: the One Lambeth Justice campaign's treasurer suggested that this vandalism was some sort of art protest, suggested that it was no different from a nice painted mural, then rowed back pretty sharpish, lol just a windup lads.
Yup. Anything which also effectively needs toxic/highly hazardous material to clean it upWell, and this.....View attachment 278761
Lots of ifs in there. What's not an if: the One Lambeth Justice campaign's treasurer suggested that this vandalism was some sort of art protest, suggested that it was no different from a nice painted mural, then rowed back pretty sharpish, lol just a windup lads.
Not my friend and I have no idea who has done this. Apparently it’s cabbies, I have nothing to do with them.
What, your random fact free suppositions?That’s a pretty simple concept to grasp hold of
Are you actually being serious? Read the post above about me saying what would happen if I said it was cabbies…So you do have some information about who has done it, or at least could help the Police with their enquiries as it does sound like you can put them in touch with people who've 'heard something'....
Cabbies being "London's finest" of course.... (this was posted by their trade association yesterday - obviously when you're a law breaker "the odds being stacked against you" and it's good to know your trade association will help keep you behind the wheel.)
I thought there was a guy works down the Facebook swears he knowsthis?What, your random fact free suppositions?
No, whether you would blindly agree or disagree with something if it either a) confirmed your likely position or b) ran counter to that position without there being any facts to back up either positionWhat, your random fact free suppositions?
Sorry, I shouldn’t have said that. I apologise. I should have said unquestioningly or without thoughtYou’ve previously posted things on here, had it pointed out you were incorrect, you’ve back tracked, apologised and clarified. So at the moment I’m taking anything you say with a massive pinch of salt thanks.
And I know you’re relatively new to this anti-ableist world - but what metaphor have you just used?
They don't care about this/my neighbourhood, they just want to be able to drive through there. Upper Tulse Hill was a horrible road to cross before and the filter has transformed this part. Parents take their time to cross with kids here now and people stop to chat. It used to have tons of commercial vehicles bombing down here just to avoid the south circular.
According to One Lambeth’s treasurer, people who are concerned about environmental injustice.
There is also Richard Wilson’s 20:50 (from the Saatchi but also appeared at the Hayward a few years ago). On seeing it George Melly allegedly said that it made him want to release a cormorant.An artist known to me made an installation piece to raise environmental awareness
it was a shallow enclosure 6‘ by 8‘ containing used sump oil to a depth of about 2” with a diorama of a tropical paradise and a sandy beach juxtaposed within it. It got great plaudits at the exhibition, but problems started with the de-install and it rapidly became a real life environmental issue when the oil would not go back into cans to be disposed of safely, in fact that palaver was quite symbolically powerful in its own right.
or even to someone else's....
Tbf that’s a much more accomplished piece than the low budget one I was talking about. Is ’releasing a cormorant’ a euphemism for something...?There is also Richard Wilson’s 20:50 (from the Saatchi but also appeared at the Hayward a few years ago). On seeing it George Melly allegedly said that it made him want to release a cormorant.
Richard Wilson » Saatchi Gallery
www.saatchigallery.com
Also, why use oil (I assume it is). If it’s just vandalism use creosote or something like that which is cheaper as this is a fair amount of oil
Possibly knowing Melly but I think he meant it literally.Tbf that’s a much more accomplished piece than the low budget one I was talking about. Is ’releasing a cormorant’ a euphemism for something...?