This totally doesn’t sound like a scam
Brixton Liveable Neighbourhood and LTN schemes - improvements for pedestrians and cyclists
- Thread starter teuchter
- Start date
This totally doesn’t sound like a scam
editor
hiraethified
Most campaign groups struggle to reach £500.
Their first crowdfunder that closed in Nov 2020 raised £2,180 to finance themselves, while their second one for legal fees reached a huge £35,000.
But apparently they doesn't make them a well funded campaign group.
OneLambeth
A resident-led campaign shining a light on 'low traffic neighbourhoods' (LTNs) in Lambeth.
www.crowdfunder.co.uk
Donate to OneLambeth LTN Legal Challenge, organized by One Lambeth
In May 2020, Lambeth Council began closing residential roads to create “Low Traffic Neighbo… One Lambeth needs your support for OneLambeth LTN Legal Challenge
Trebles all round !Most campaign groups struggle to reach £500.
Their first crowdfunder that closed in Nov 2020 raised £2,180 to finance themselves, while their second one for legal fees reached a huge £35,000.
But apparently they doesn't make them a well funded campaign group.
OneLambeth
A resident-led campaign shining a light on 'low traffic neighbourhoods' (LTNs) in Lambeth.Donate to OneLambeth LTN Legal Challenge, organized by One Lambeth
In May 2020, Lambeth Council began closing residential roads to create “Low Traffic Neighbo… One Lambeth needs your support for OneLambeth LTN Legal Challengewww.gofundme.com
liquidindian
Hello
We hear so many complaints about filtered roads "dividing local communities" and about the troubles of local people who need to move their fridge freezer on the regular or whatever. And yet it turns out that 82% of PCNs for people who refuse or cannae be bothered to follow the rules in Hackney are for people who don't live in Hackney.
www.hackneygazette.co.uk
Council raises £2.7m by fining drivers for breaching LTNs
Hackney Council has raked in £2.7m by fining drivers £130-a-pop for breaching controversial low traffic neighbourhood (LTN) rules.
snowy_again
Slush
And that first appeal specifically links back to the one Lambeth Facebook group!Most campaign groups struggle to reach £500.
Their first crowdfunder that closed in Nov 2020 raised £2,180 to finance themselves, while their second one for legal fees reached a huge £35,000.
But apparently they doesn't make them a well funded campaign group.
OneLambeth
A resident-led campaign shining a light on 'low traffic neighbourhoods' (LTNs) in Lambeth.Donate to OneLambeth LTN Legal Challenge, organized by One Lambeth
In May 2020, Lambeth Council began closing residential roads to create “Low Traffic Neighbo… One Lambeth needs your support for OneLambeth LTN Legal Challenge
I’m assuming that’s when the other OL ran OL?
We hear so many complaints about filtered roads "dividing local communities" and about the troubles of local people who need to move their fridge freezer on the regular or whatever. And yet it turns out that 82% of PCNs for people who refuse or cannae be bothered to follow the rules in Hackney are for people who don't live in Hackney.
Council raises £2.7m by fining drivers for breaching LTNs
Hackney Council has raked in £2.7m by fining drivers £130-a-pop for breaching controversial low traffic neighbourhood (LTN) rules.
who’d have thought
Torpid Scorpion
Basket case
Ed, its an incredible labour of love your trying to engage with these motor cunts.
Torpid Scorpion
Basket case
this is exactly why we need LTNs and a bunch more of them.
Yes - ltns block ratruns
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
Obviously you're confusing One Lambeth with One Lambeth which has nothing to do with the One Lambeth Facebook group. Of course it might be the OneLambeth Justice twitter account which has nothing to do with the court case or the person who was raising the money despite being the route by which their statements and the outcome of the case were shared. None of the people or groups the accounts claim to represent has any control over the messaging or knows who actually runs any of them.
Remember that the majority of residents in Lambeth support OneLambeth and oppose LTNs. Thats despite only 35 people (including neutral observers like Gramsci and others) turning up to their Brixton protest, a couple of hundred turning up to the London wide protest last weekend, only about 600 donating to the legal fund and fewer Lambeth residents voting for their promoted candidate Farah at the mayoral election than thought Count Binface was the man (apologies for gender assumption) to sort out London.
Last edited:
Top scamming lads !
Torpid Scorpion
Basket case
It seems that chowce5382 has fled, having realised he was on the wrong side of history. I think he was probably well intentioned and the cognitive dissonance of working with the many (all ugly) faces of oneLambeth must have been really stressful.
thebackrow
Considerably more Brixton.
Given all the dog whistles in his protest speech and the various lies and exaggerations he was happy to spout on here I think you're being far too kind.
Jesterburger
Well-Known Member
He's still lurking here, just not posting.
snowy_again
Slush
Last seen 49 minutes ago...
Attachments
snowy_again
Slush
I’ve not run their messages through any of the twitter analytics tools, but the more spiky OLJ posts are getting less and less traction - down to the same 40 same accounts.
They’ve just retweeted a GB News article.
They’ve just retweeted a GB News article.
Torpid Scorpion
Basket case
Maybe. But I think he's not really the Joseph Goebbels of OneLambeth. Probably more a Bogdan Radista figure. "Useful Innocent"
snowy_again
Slush
Not really- it’s a pretty standard XenForo site and he signed up to the t&cs - and is perfectly capable of hiding his profile page if he wishes.
Don’t you think it’s strange that he was a frequent poster before the case and then disappeared?
Don’t you think it’s strange that he was a frequent poster before the case and then disappeared?
cuppa tee
Well-Known Member
....what he or she does is not what I’m on about, I’m referring to people looking at his profile and posting the findings, it seems a bit weird and obsessive to an outsider.
snowy_again
Slush
But you’re not an outsider (and nor is he by signing up to be a member) and this forum platform encourages it - scroll down and look at the associated threads - it links to one you and I were posting in about cycling 8 years ago...
teuchter
je suis teuchter
Seems fair enough really if chowce5382 decides not to engage further on here - what does anyone expect him to say? He came here to discuss things related to the case, and the case is finished. Like Torpid Scorpion I'm happy to assume his actions were broadly well intentioned, and agree that it must have been a stressful process and that there will have been others under the Onelambeth banner saying things that he would not necessarily agree with.
Last edited:
It's fair enough but he was happy to hint at things that happened in court and claim the LTNs were unlawful etc. which don't seem tio fit in with the judgement so just to disengage now & not explain his view on it seems slightly out of order - but maybe it is the stress of it or that it's just reached the end of the road.
cuppa tee
Well-Known Member
That is quite a weird reply in itself ....I’ve stayed out of the cut and thrust of this debate for the most part because it is so nasty and experience tells me that me posting my views on here is unlikely to have any influence on final outcomes, I’m a nobody and not part of any lobby or grouping and not taking sides...Regards the way. the forum works I know enough to quote if I am replying to someone so they can respond if they can be bothered.
Torpid Scorpion
Basket case
Of course they should be able to keep appealing until all avenues of appeal are closed to them. thats the nature of the adversarial judicial system. And if the mötorheads want to keep funding them, thats fine. I hope their liability for costs on Lambeth's side is not capped at a low amount for appeals, and that they have to raise money or a bond for it, which should go a ways to keeping it 'real'.
I just wish they would drop the anti-khan, anti-cyclist, anti-flowers, anti-kids, asshole bullshit aspects but what do you expect from a bunch of car nuts that are posing (incompetently) as equalities activists and dont understand that the new world is being born, and they are the morbid symptom.
I feel bad for Ms. Sheakh (apparently we have been spelling her name wrong) and hope the negative effects on her end up getting mitigated by changes to the implementation.
But roll on LTNs!
I just wish they would drop the anti-khan, anti-cyclist, anti-flowers, anti-kids, asshole bullshit aspects but what do you expect from a bunch of car nuts that are posing (incompetently) as equalities activists and dont understand that the new world is being born, and they are the morbid symptom.
I feel bad for Ms. Sheakh (apparently we have been spelling her name wrong) and hope the negative effects on her end up getting mitigated by changes to the implementation.
But roll on LTNs!
snowy_again
Slush
Yeah, sorry probably an over coffee’d reply from me - basically bemoaning the algorithms in social media.
Last edited:
Fair play, if they want to continue the legal challenge, it’s their money. The only caveat in that update is that it doesn’t talk about removing the LTNs, merely how they are implemented for disabled people which I think all of us are in agreement about allowing a blue badge exemption. I’m not sure that’s what most of the people opposed to LTNs would be happy with if that was the only outcome.
Similar threads
