Council figures:
Greens: 85,325; 31.8% (+11.9)
Labour: 85,014; 31.7% (-4.9)
Con: 56,913; 21.3% (-0.9)
Lib Dems: 39,480; 14.7% (-2.2)
Narrow win for the Greens in the popular vote with the Tories practically treading water and Lib Dems continuing their steady decline, though in seat terms they appear to be holding their few remaining strongholds - the likes of Stephen Williams (outgoing H&H councillor) and Gary Hopkins (Knowle) do work very hard and get that incumbency bonus tbf
Must admit I was surprised the Tories didn't make any headway really - a narrow gain in ALW balanced by a decisive loss in Horfield their only striking results. As I may have said upthread, it would seem that the Labour vote has held up better in wards where the Tories are the main threat while it has crumbled elsewhere. Aside from their obvious multiple gains, the Greens also had striking results in ALW - where sitting councillor Jo Sergeant had defected from Labour and only just failed to retain her seat as a Green - and Filwood where they finished 3rd and 4th behind Labour.
The Green Party now have council seats in all four of Bristol's parliamentary constituencies and can reasonably claim to be either winning or polling well in a number of different types of ward - student heavy Central, the muesli belt of central north Bristol, affluent Clifton and areas that could either be described as only partly or hardly gentrified such as Lockleaze, Eastville, Bedminster, Lawrence Hill, Windmill Hill & Easton.
Comparing the council vote to the mayoral vote(s), it definitely looks like a chunk of Bristolians played safe with their votes by voting for the Labour incumbent (Rees) or the Labour candidate most likely to unseat the Tories (Norris) whilst taking the opportunity to vote with either their heart or to give Labour a kicking - you choose - in the council vote.
Definitely interesting times ahead in terms of cabinet posts, the budget and ultimately what happens in 2024. With Rees insisting he will step down next time, the mayoralty will definitely be up for grabs especially if the Greens can find a candidate who can capture people's imagination and attention in a way Hore-Ruthven failed miserably to.
As for what it means for the next General Election - well Thangam's got to be worried even if the others may still benefit from anti-Tory pragmatism amongst their constituents