Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brexit and Austerity

Which would you rather see the back of?

  • Article 126 which regulates the sizer of government deficits

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
What’s wrong with article 126?
It limits government borrowing levels in relation to GDP. Labour's end to austerity, according to the shadow Chancellor is to be done through borrowing.


Said limits were why we ended up with PFI
 
Said limits were why we ended up with PFI
PFI was ostensibly connected to a vague attempt to aspire to what's now Article 140 (Eurozone convergence criteria). But that was only really ever a pretext for an ideological project of opening public services to the private sector. In any event, it wasn't to do with Article 126.
 
PFI was ostensibly connected to a vague attempt to aspire to what's now Article 140 (Eurozone convergence criteria). But that was only really ever a pretext for an ideological project of opening public services to the private sector. In any event, it wasn't to do with Article 126.

There are even more rigid constraints for thems that want to go down the EUro route, and granted the EUro convergence dept of the Treasury wasn't closed til Cameron got in (regardless of what Brown said) and granted Tony's fiends did very nicely out of PFI, but in EU we are bound by Art 126... The WASPI payback alone is twice the current defence budget
 
Compliance procedures here. In short, a line of hoops to jump through before any enforcement, tortuously slow, and vague criteria that can be got around with clever lawyering. The Con-Dems didn't want to try. Italy's been flouting it for years, and unlike the U.K. with its opt-outs, she's in the eurozone. The U.K., with a sovereign currency, could ultimately create the money it needs.

It shouldn't be judged in a vacuum. The hit from leaving the single market would far outstrip this feeble piece of euro law.
 
There are even more rigid constraints for thems that want to go down the EUro route, and granted the EUro convergence dept of the Treasury wasn't closed til Cameron got in (regardless of what Brown said) and granted Tony's fiends did very nicely out of PFI, but in EU we are bound by Art 126... The WASPI payback alone is twice the current defence budget
Whitehall could make a case that an exception could be made, ask that it not be included in current spending, hire whoever the Italians use to talk their way outa enforcement ...

This stuff looks far worse in theory that it is in practice, and practice is what ultimately matters.
 
Back
Top Bottom