Ax^
Silly Rabbit
Pretty straight forward libcom sentiments he's expressing?
who me? you are mistaken but your defending a shite posting troll so maybe you've just not be following the thread long enongh
Pretty straight forward libcom sentiments he's expressing?
His politics is probably all over the place but he's basically a liberal who thinks that the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was justified.
Bizarre that you don't even know who I was referring to.who me? you are mistaken but your defending a shite posting troll so maybe you've just not be following the thread long enongh
Well there go. Electoralism is a helluva drug.my post are irrelevant
please tell me again how people not voting against Bolsanaro would of helped in his defeat
ya fucknut
As if all I believe in is not voting. Thats a complete misrepresentation, or you're just too much of an idiot to understand. I believe in building autonomous working class grass roots movements not handing over power to traitorous politicians like you do.oddly forget rid of populist leaders its kind of effective
rather than not voting
As if all I belive in is not voting. Thats a complete misrepresentation, or you're just too much of an idiot to understand.
Sadly soPretty straight forward libcom sentiments he's expressing?
Not so bad now you're posting again tho. Just a bleak wreckGod this place is a dismal wreck.
You're a disingenuous twat who always deliberately misrepresents everything people post on here if they have different views to you. And you are posting way too much, taking up too much space on the thread as usual. Go and argue with someone else you contentious authoritarian prick.its what you stated fella we covered this shite before
remember quote hunter s Thompson at me
Bizarre that you don't even know who I was referring to.
I'm pretty dubious about the term 'state capitalist' tbh. If a state has nationalised industries and is no longer running those industries in order to produce a profit for investors, the term 'capitalist' doesn't really apply. The mechanics of capitalism as laid out by Marx, for instance, don't apply. Other forms of oppression and exploitation can occur, but they're not capitalist oppression and exploitation. I think that's playing fast and loose with definitions in a very unhelpful way. And it really, really doesn't help you to understand what Cuba is and was under Fidel Castro.Obviously not if you think that Fidel Castro is a heroic anti-capitalist revolutionary and not a privileged state capitalist oppressor.
You're a disingenuous twat who always misrepresents everything people post on here just because they have different views to you. And you are posting way too much, taking up too much space on the thread as usual. Go and argue with someone else yeou contentious prick.
always misrepresents everything people post on here
I really don't careI'm pretty dubious about the term 'state capitalist' tbh.
Or indeed know anything.I really don't care
I really don't care
You still have a class system with the state being the boss.I'm pretty dubious about the term 'state capitalist' tbh. If a state has nationalised industries and is no longer running those industries in order to produce a profit for investors, the term 'capitalist' doesn't really apply. The mechanics of capitalism as laid out by Marx, for instance, don't apply. Other forms of oppression and exploitation can occur, but they're not capitalist oppression and exploitation. I think that's playing fast and loose with definitions in a very unhelpful way. And it really, really doesn't help you to understand what Cuba is and was under Fidel Castro.
So a profit's ok as long as it's not produced for investors. GrandI'm pretty dubious about the term 'state capitalist' tbh. If a state has nationalised industries and is no longer running those industries in order to produce a profit for investors, the term 'capitalist' doesn't really apply. The mechanics of capitalism as laid out by Marx, for instance, don't apply. Other forms of oppression and exploitation can occur, but they're not capitalist oppression and exploitation. I think that's playing fast and loose with definitions in a very unhelpful way. And it really, really doesn't help you to understand what Cuba is and was under Fidel Castro.
No thats what you've done, no doubt to try and hide my post about Lula on the previous page by insessantly posting childish, antagonising crap.but you still keep stinking the thread up
Yes, I can go along with that. But you have a class system under feudalism as well, or a slave society. It's not peculiar to capitalism and the capitalist mode of production.You still have a class system with the state being the boss.
No thats what you've done, no doubt to try and hide my post about Lula.
I'm just saying that AA is expressing pretty ordinary libcom positions and I'm surprised by the flak he's getting.Yes, I can go along with that. But you have a class system under feudalism as well, or a slave society. It's not peculiar to capitalism and the capitalist mode of production.
It's because he's been posting total bollocks on this thread ever since Sunday.I'm just saying that AA is expressing pretty ordinary libcom positions and I'm surprised by the flak he's getting.
I'm just saying that AA is expressing pretty ordinary libcom positions and I'm surprised by the flak he's getting.
Thats absolute horseshitIt's because he's been posting total bollocks on this thread ever since Sunday.