Pizza Express ahoy!
Pizza Express ahoy!
Can't they already do that in Brixton Village?Maybe it'll become an "edgy" eaterie where "creatives" can congregate and "network"...
Pubs tend to be closing more than opening these days.Doesn't have to be a restaurant. The use class is A3 - Food and Drink, so a pub is still possible.
Can't they already do that in Brixton Village?
And a visit from Prince Charles only last year.I would be very interested to know exactly how the ABC plans fell through. It was ll looking quite promising at one point, with money on the way etc.
Sad news.
£85 grand a year rent. So you'd need to take £1635 per week just to pay the rent - prob £2.5k per week to break even. Is that possible for a boozer?
"Well connected to local transport links. £1500 per month."The upstairs rooms rattle like billy-o when a train goes by.
Only the downstairs and basement are up for rent. Which means the top two/three floors must be getting converted into flats. Which means it is unlikely that a pub or music venue would be able to trade there.
Massive and
Can't they already do that in Brixton Village?
And a visit from Prince Charles only last year.
The uppers are to let separately, as offices.
You'd need way more than 50k to get the ground and basement up and running.
When they were selling the council was looking to proposals for purchase which "lead to the regeneration of Brady's and provide A3 and community use". The agents told me that this would be made conditional through planning restrictions. I would be interested to hear how this condition has been met - particularly since it put a lot of bidders off and will have substantially reduced the sale price.
Jenkins Law - property developers - http://www.jenkinslaw.co.uk/property.phpDo we know who the new owner is btw?
They're normally surveyors and consultants. What makes you think they purchased it?Jenkins Law - property developers - http://www.jenkinslaw.co.uk/property.php
Yep, we've seen things like "community use" watered down so many times in the planning process. Properties often seem to get left empty/unused for ages until the planning committee is persuaded to think "ah fuck it, we might as well just get someone in to use the place..."The trouble with this is that it still is to be argued through planning. I can see whoever has bought it watering down any commitment to community use eventually. Kind of thing developers are good at. Arguing this would make it commercially unviable. Unless the sale had some kind of commitments already written into it. Which Im not sure is possible.
It was in the Ed's report on his blog.....They're normally surveyors and consultants. What makes you think they purchased it?
Too much stink from the butchers.Yep, we've seen things like "community use" watered down so many times in the planning process. Properties often seem to get left empty/unused for ages until the planning committee is persuaded to think "ah fuck it, we might as well just get someone in to use the place..."
I imagine a chain like Pizza Express or similar could clean up/smarten up that end of Electric Lane, stick some tables & chairs on the pavement and claim that is "community use"....
I would be very interested to know exactly how the ABC plans fell through. It was ll looking quite promising at one point, with money on the way etc.