ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
I've one criticism, why does he drag it out for so long?
Give 'em enough rope...
I've one criticism, why does he drag it out for so long?
So you, MrA and Y_I_Otter are all former Stormfront posters? edit: oh I see, with opposing views
Experienced at posting against the far right yet think that i'm far right. Did you not pick anything up? Learn anything?
I'd say "they're not Nazis or fascists, but their politics are partly based on spurious 'race' arguments and on a version of nationalism that is far more excluding than, for example, the nationalism of the Scots. Look to their history and to the non-policy pronouncements of their leadership and make your own mind up exactly how worthy they are of support".
Give 'em enough rope...
I most certainly have not accused you of being 'far right' nor have I seen any evidence that Y_I_Otter or MrA have either.
MrA has merely indicated that you appear neutral on the issue. I myself am not involved enough in the thread to comment on what I think your position is.
Links to what? Links to you being out-argued time and time again? Use the search function on your own user-name and read 'em and fucking weep!
MR A has, repeatdly. You had a go at backing him up.
'appear neutral' - 'I myself am not involved enough in the thread'. Appeaser.
'Appear neutral' were words I took from MrA, that's exactly what he said, word for word. They aren't my own, I'm not going to judge this guy without reading all of his posts, something I don't have the inclination to do. You can rush in with your judgements if you like but I won't.
Oh, I didn't realise this question was directed at me. Duh! What do you mean did I learn anything from them?Did you not pick anything up from posting with the far right? Learn anything from them?
What 'guy'? You just said that he's your mate from elsewhere. Unravelling.
What 'guy'? You just said that he's your mate from elsewhere. Unravelling.
What do you mean by "the growth of Islam"? Do you mean it is expanding it's base of followers in the UK, or that it's becoming a more visible political force?They are right to be concerned about the growth of Islam in this country.
Define what you mean by "too many", please.They are right to want to cut immigration and they are right to advocate voluntary repatriation, there are too many immigrants in this country.
No, they haven't. Not of legal immigration, which is the only sort they can control. If you want to moan about illegal immigration, have a word with the Prime Minister who halved the number of posts for immigration inspectors at British ports of entry back in the 1990s.This government have lost control of immigration.
Figures for "scam marriages" and for "bogus asylum seekers", pleaseThere are too many scam marriages and too many bogus asylum seekers.
Are they?They are right to want to bring back the death penalty regards serial killers like Huntley, Nielson and terrorists etc etc.
So they say. Pity they haven't made any substantive proposals whatsoever and now have two of their hierarchy serving as Euro MPs.They want to keep the pound and get out of the EU.
And I'm sure that, given the chance, you do.The list is endless I could go on.
What is an "unnecessary university degree" when it's at home, then?Now you tell me what they are so wrong about???
They are right to want to cut funding for unnecessary University degrees.
So you keep saying, although all we have to prove your claims is...well, your insistence that "they're right to".They are right to
When I said judge the guy I meant you, for some reason I thought I was responding to a different poster. It's been a long day and I have a headache, cut me some slack.
....believe in the leadership principle?
That hasn't been the case for me, and I have spent all my 47 years living alongside the British-born children of immigrants, and I can't remember any of them defining themselves in the way you claim is common.Ask a black immigrant who they think they are, inevitably they'd say Asian first then British.
Well, that's exactly how most of my mates define themselves: As Anglo-Caribbean, Anglo-Pakistani etc.Take the racism out of it, the Americans have got it right Asian/American African/American etc etc.
That's about as likely to happen as you are likely to wake up tomorrow a millionaire.If the PC brigade have their way they will be asking to totally remove the photo on passports and driving licences soon.
You get East African Asians, Indo-Caribbeans, Sino-Caribbeans and loads of other mixes.It's not about racism it's about identity. After all you don't get black Asian Chinese do you???
Odd use of such stale, content-free trad-left curse words by someone as vibrantly human as TBH
Still waiting for links. You both lying?
In fact where have I ever called anybody have a fascist?
MSF = MootStormfront. It was set up several years ago as a result of the draconian moderation in the Stormfront opposing views section, it wasn't set up as a response to the BNP.
Any discussion of the BNP on that forum is of just the same value and relevance as it is on this site. It was from that website that MrA and I found this one, through Y_I_Otter. I have been posting on MSF since 2006 (around the time I joined here you'll notice, though I've only recently started posting on a semi-regular basis) and it most certainly is not a friendly platform for racists nor has it ever been.
Why? How do you define neo-fascist? Has Nick Griffin never been fascist? If yes, at what point did he stop being one?
liar.
While you and TBH have retained your purity.
That's called "projection" by shrinks, you know.
Sorry, you are right what you said was even more daft
I don't know butchersapron, apart from on these boards, but it's obvious that he does know a great deal about fascism and has some ideas of how to fight it.
He only picks on those who appear bereft of any ideas in effectively opposing the BNP of today. In reply, we see the usual smear and exaggeration, to hide the posters own lack of knowledge on the subject - dangerous.
I've one criticism, why does he drag it out for so long?
They are right to be concerned about the growth of Islam in this country.
They are right to want to cut immigration and they are right to advocate voluntary repatriation, there are too many immigrants in this country. This government have lost control of immigration. There are too many scam marriages and too many bogus asylum seekers.
They are right to want to bring back the death penalty regards serial killers like Huntley, Nielson and terrorists etc etc
They want to keep the pound and get out of the EU.
The list is endless I could go on.
Now you tell me what they are so wrong about???
They are right to want to cut funding for unnecessary University degrees.
They are right to
His "tactic" at least causes no harm. This is why it is superior to UAF.
He doesn't stand up against the establishment, he's part of it, like his political forebears Mosley and Chesterton (to name but two). He's about as heroic as a wet fart.