Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

BNP leader faces jail!!

I've had to wade through pages of you dealing with your pique on the off chance that somebody is saying something interesting. I would put you on ignore as an idiot time waster, but you are so fantastically stupid and self-centred that you are willing to ally with a BNP sympathiser to satisfy your pique. You are an idiot time waster, but not a completely harmless idiot time waster.

Please link to where I have done this, or as I suspect you're a fucking liar.
 
Originally Posted by butchersapron
To what? To bolster the same failed agenda as outlined in the OP? Why would i do that? The whoel approach of the thread is poltically fucked, it's asking people to contribute to helping the same failed approach. Bin the thread, bin this approach.

Originally Posted by ResistanceMP3
well just ignore the thread you attention seeking self centered little twot.

Originally Posted by butchersapron
That would be political cowardice.

You clearly lost that one.
 
His "tactic" at least causes no harm. This is why it is superior to UAF.

Let's ask a hypothetical question.

Suppose that Griffin were going to jail over not allowing non-whites into the BNP (note that this is hypothetical - they aren't and he won't). What should anti-fascists do? What would your tactic be? Cheer?

Can't you even see the obvious point that this will do wonders for Griffin's credibility? Do you still think that yapping on about the BNP=criminals gets you anywhere?

More to the point, don't you have a small element of principle in you that worries about the state determining how a party can choose it's members?

Don't even try to engage me in 'debate' on the topic of the thread, after once again butcher's has fucked any possibility, and you are unable to concieve of the possibility butchers is wrong.

Answer the question put to you, or just fuckoff like the liar's.

[/QUOTE]Still waiting for links. You both lying?
 
Islam of fundamental Islam? Islam is no more dangerous than Catholicism, it's the interpretation that's a problem and the feeling of lack of integration. Or am I off the mark here?



OK. That's the prevailing opinion these days it's only a matter of time before the big two adopt a harder immigration stance and dress it up as something new and funky, especially if it's a vote winner.



That's a whole other thread.


So do the Tories.:)




Couldn't agree more! I have the pleasure of interviewing graduates in Media Studies and Greenkeeping.

Firstly, I think it's wrong that they propose to strip Brit's of their citizenship and classify them as 2nd/3rd class citizens.

Ask a black immigrant who they think they are, inevitably they'd say Asian first then British. Take the racism out of it, the Americans have got it right Asian/American African/American etc etc. If the PC brigade have their way they will be asking to totally remove the photo on passports and driving licences soon. It's not about racism it's about identity. After all you don't get black Asian Chinese do you???
 
OMG! :eek:

This is an alliance? You have the audacity to call me an idiot and here's clear proof of your pathetic idiocy.

I'd rather engage a sympathiser who shows me civility and hopefully put a few seeds of doubt in their minds. You lot just attack and that just entrenches their view, the very fucking thing you say that shouldn't be done.

Is this the superior tactic? :rolleyes:
he's taking the piss now. with friends,,,,,,,,
 
Strategy? Or just a forum you plank.

I don't support no platform for the BNP, but only because it would be counter productive given their current orientation. However, handing them a friendly platform...

Let me know how it goes.
 
Ask a black immigrant who they think they are, inevitably they'd say Asian first then British.

How many do you actually know? Seriously. Anyway, wouldn't a Scotsman be a Scotsman and still be British? Asian is an ethnicity not a Nationality, what's more important?

Take the racism out of it, the Americans have got it right Asian/American African/American etc etc.

But they're still Americans. :confused:

If the PC brigade have their way they will be asking to totally remove the photo on passports and driving licences soon. It's not about racism it's about identity.

I can't see why, in fact the photgraph was a relatively new addition to the driving license, if anything they'd love us all to have photo ID cards.

But back to my question in my previous post, I'd be interested to hear you view on the matter.


After all you don't get black Asian Chinese do you???
Please elborate.
 
I don't support no platform for the BNP, but only because it would be counter productive given their current orientation. However, handing them a friendly platform...

Let me know how it goes.

It's been going for years, and a friendly platform, do me a favour. :rolleyes:

Can't you see that with your attitude anyone remotely thinking about supporting the BNP would be putting their X on the ballot paper quick a a flash after being subjected to you superior tactics, come on do share this superior tactic of yours. All I can see is lot of hot air.
 
It's been going for years, and a friendly platform, do me a favour. :rolleyes:

Can't you see that with your attitude anyone remotely thinking about supporting the BNP would be putting their X on the ballot paper quick a a flash after being subjected to you superior tactics, come on do share this superior tactic of yours. All I can see is lot of hot air.

You only know about my attitude to you and that's that you're an idiot time waster. Go ahead and vote BNP if it will make you feel better about my attitude. See if I care, 'cos you'll end up voting Lib Dem to spite some BNP member being rude to you. With some people there is just no hope.
 
You cant understand his point, can you?
More clearly than you, obviously.
His point is, NO ONE has "purity"!

Odd then, that he didn't actually make that point in the post you were agreeing to, that I quoted, isn't it?
All he did was make his usual farting noises about how people are "ultra-left" or "old left", labels he attaches to anyone who doesn't agree with him and isn't obviously right-wing.
 
You only know about my attitude to you and that's that you're an idiot time waster. Go ahead and vote BNP if it will make you feel better about my attitude. See if I care, 'cos you'll end up voting Lib Dem to spite some BNP member being rude to you. With some people there is just no hope.

Good fucking Lord! You are seriously stupid, :facepalm:

I wouldn't vote BNP because of a tit like you, but others just might. ;)



PS: I fail the membership criteria as it stands, but after the court ruling who knows.


Time for bed***
 
All he did was make his usual farting noises about how people are "ultra-left" or "old left", labels he attaches to anyone who doesn't agree with him and isn't obviously right-wing.
Odd use of such stale, content-free trad-left curse words by someone as vibrantly human as TBH
 
More clearly than you, obviously.


Odd then, that he didn't actually make that point in the post you were agreeing to, that I quoted, isn't it?
All he did was make his usual farting noises about how people are "ultra-left" or "old left", labels he attaches to anyone who doesn't agree with him and isn't obviously right-wing.
[/QUOTE]Still waiting for links. You both lying?

In fact where have I ever called anybody have a fascist?
 
I'm still confused...

What would they say to any potential BNP supporter? That their position is, the BNP are bad because they're not Nazi's, racists or fascists but they're bad anyway.
I'd say "they're not Nazis or fascists, but their politics are partly based on spurious 'race' arguments and on a version of nationalism that is far more excluding than, for example, the nationalism of the Scots. Look to their history and to the non-policy pronouncements of their leadership and make your own mind up exactly how worthy they are of support".

To me there's no point shouting names at the BNP. That worked against the NF in the 1970s because the majority of their grass-roots as well as their power structure were Hitler-worshippers, and a lot of their policy was based on German, and to a lesser extent, Italian fascist policy. That's why I think that strategies based on name-calling and the diversion of votes ("vote anyone but BNP") don't work: How can they if they're removed from reality?
 
How does this strategy work?

MSF = MootStormfront. It was set up several years ago as a result of the draconian moderation in the Stormfront opposing views section, it wasn't set up as a response to the BNP.

Any discussion of the BNP on that forum is of just the same value and relevance as it is on this site. It was from that website that MrA and I found this one, through Y_I_Otter. I have been posting on MSF since 2006 (around the time I joined here you'll notice, though I've only recently started posting on a semi-regular basis) and it most certainly is not a friendly platform for racists nor has it ever been.
 
Hi, When you consider the mess the two main parties of this country have made, I find it quite pathetic to see these sort of attacks on him. The man is a hero for standing up against the establishment. Whatsmore there are many people in this country who agree with a lot of what he says.

He doesn't stand up against the establishment, he's part of it, like his political forebears Mosley and Chesterton (to name but two). He's about as heroic as a wet fart.
 
So you, MrA and Y_I_Otter are all former Stormfront posters?

No. That's just the history of Mootstormfront, it was set up by former anti-racist posters on Stormfront for the purpose of refuting the posts there without having the racist moderators arbitrarily deleting their posts.
 
Back
Top Bottom