Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Best Disney movie

Tron
The Legend of Sleepy Hollow
The Black Hole
Popeye
Condorman
Return to Oz
The Sword in the Stone
Peter Pan
Alice in Wonderland
Robin Hood
Lilo and Stitch
 
Weird to see that several people have chosen The Jungle Book. Not so bothered about racism, apparently.

(Let's skip the bit where you get all defensive and try to justify it. Just own it.)
 
Weird to see that several people have chosen The Jungle Book. Not so bothered about racism, apparently.

(Let's skip the bit where you get all defensive and try to justify it. Just own it.)
The Jungle Book is far from the only one or even considered the worst offender:


I put Dumbo at the top of my list, which arguably features a scene of worse racial stereotyping than anything in The Jungle Book. But as a little gay kid, Disney movies were all I got to see at the cinema and I related to Dumbo as a "queer" character, who got abused for being different and who comes into his own by the end. The racial coding of the crows, who are sympathetic characters and who help Dumbo to realise his potential but who are a representation of a racist pun, went over my head.

I'm into classic movies and even more questionably, into vintage exploitation films. Something to come to terms with (or not) is that 20th century art and entertainment can be problematic. These films will share outdated and/or offensive views on race, LGBT+ values, women and other civil right issues when judged from a 21st century perspective. It's necessary to acknowledge racism, homophobia, misogyny, etc in those films but (within reason) everyone has to decide for themselves what they'll watch or what they'll "cancel". The Jungle Book can be read as racially coded, the villain of The Lion King can be read as stereotypically gay and the old Disney princess movies are plainly sexist. I don't endorse the dodgy representations in those films, I regard them as educational in regard to historical representation of oppressed groups and minorities in popular culture. I also believe there is a difference between films like The Jungle Book, where the subtext lends itself to interpretation and films which are outright racist, like Song of the South, which Disney have now locked in a vault never to be released again.

Good podcast on racism in Disney movies and classic Hollywood in general here:

 
Last edited:
Good post Reno I’m also into vintage films, and they are indeed a document of outdated (at best) attitudes towards oppressed groups in society. Indeed many of these prejudices, and perhaps sexism and misogyny in particular, are still rife in film narrative.

Some films I could watch in the past I can no longer stomach. For example, I recently attempted to watch South Pacific and found the racism from the start nauseating, all the more so because of the knowledge that the authors of the show and film imagined they were furthering the cause of liberal attitudes towards race.

The Quiet Man is a comedy about domestic violence. A boxer who had accidentally killed an opponent in the ring beats his girlfriend up all the way along the road from one village to the next, to the cheers of the locals lining the street, and she becomes a better woman for it.

I had more to say but real life has just intervened and that’ll have to do for now.
 
It's a good job that all of the films and TV made by left leaning people now will always be deemed acceptable by people in the future as our ideas and ideals are perfect...
 
The Toy Story films are outstanding from start to finish, Up is also worthy of mention, The animated movies range from OK in the case of Lion King up to great in the forms of Aladdin, Mulan and of course Jungle Book.
The live remakes are also variable, I thought the live action remakes of Beauty and the Beast and Cinderella were better than the originals
The live action remake of Jungle Book was meh
I also really enjoyed the live action remakes of Aladdin and Mulan though the latter was a completely different film rather than a remake.
 
I like the way that all the castles in the Disney parks are named after princesses, Cinderella's Sleeping Beauty's etc except for the one in Shanghai which is the Enchanted Story Book Castle...

(Also Main Street there - with most of the shops is only 50 M long as opposed to the quarter mile at the other ones...)
 
Last edited:
Weird to see that several people have chosen The Jungle Book. Not so bothered about racism, apparently.

(Let's skip the bit where you get all defensive and try to justify it. Just own it.)

But then you probably think that other Kipling source material like Kim or East and West is racist.
 
Tangled, Moana, Frozen all excellent and rewatchable. Historic fondness for Bedknobs and Broomsticks even though it is pretty crap. If including Pixar, WALL-E always at the top.

I know everyone rates Up but it has always bored the tits off me.
 
All of the Pixar features were produced, funded and distributed by Disney and billed as Disney Pixar, from the beginning. Pixar only ever produced short films independently. Then Disney bought them, and the films continued to be made in the same way.
disney bought them in 2006. But their films were still produced with the Pixar team. really shouldn't be classed as "disney films".
 
disney bought them in 2006. But their films were still produced with the Pixar team. really shouldn't be classed as "disney films".
I also don't class the Pixar films as Disney films. If you count Pixar films as Disney, then you may just as well count Touchstone or Buena Vista, which were Disney production and distribution companies that made live action films for an adult audience, like Con Air and Pretty Woman. Pixar helped Disney with their on computer animated films but this didn't go the other way. Creatively Pixar always stayed independent from Disney.

Mrs Frisby and the Rats of NIMH
Not Disney, that one was by United Artists and that's the title of the book and not the movie, which was called The Secret of NIMH (and Mrs Frisby was renamed Mrs Brisby)
 
Last edited:
The Jungle Book is far from the only one or even considered the worst offender.


I put Dumbo at the top of my list, which arguably features a scene of worse racial stereotyping than anything in The Jungle Book. But as a little gay kid, Disney movies were all I got to see at the cinema and I related to Dumbo as a "queer" character, who was abused and made fun of for being different and who comes into his own by the end. The racial coding of the crows (who are sympathetic characters and who help Dumbo to be ok with himself, but who are basically a nasty racist pun) went over my head.

I'm into classic movies and even more questionable vintage exploitation films and something to content with is that 20th century art and entertainment can be problematic. These films will share outdated and/or offensive views on race, LGBT+ values, women and other civil right issues when judged from a 21st century perspective. It's necessary to acknowledge racism, homophobia, misogyny, etc in these films but within reason, everyone has to decide for themselves what they'll refuse to watch or what they'll "cancel". The Jungle Book can be read as racially coded, the villains of The Lion King and The Little Mermaid can be read as stereotypically queer and the old Disney princess movies are plainly sexist. I don't endorse the dodgy representations in those films, I regard them educational in regard to historical representation of oppressed groups and minorities in popular culture. I also believe there is a difference between films like The Jungle Book, where the subtext lends itself to interpretation and films which are outright racist, like Song of the South, which Disney have now locked in a vault never to be released again.

Good podcast on racism in Disney movies and classic Hollywood in general here:

Yeah, I take your points. Haven't watched any of the old school animations (in full) since childhood, tbh, as I can't stomach them. The racism makes me wince and cringe. Not seen The Lion King as I was suspicious of it from the off :thumbs:

I'm really glad there's other stuff to watch now, especially for children. I don't imagine that white children watching would consciously notice the racist stereotypes, unless they're in a massively openly racist family, but I think it does have a background influence. The difference between the openly racist stuff and the subtext stuff isn't a useful one, for me. They both just feel racist.
 
It's a good job that all of the films and TV made by left leaning people now will always be deemed acceptable by people in the future as our ideas and ideals are perfect...
That's just silly.
 
Made by ex disney people though, and feels like disney to watch imo, so I'm counting it as in. More in than pixar films anyway.
Donald Bluth, who left a minor position as an animator at Disney to set himself up as a writer, director and CEO of a company in direct competition to Disney was not Disney. You can count that in as much as you like and you still will be wrong. Bluth regarded himself as very different to Disney.
 
The Jungle Book is far from the only one or even considered the worst offender:


I put Dumbo at the top of my list, which arguably features a scene of worse racial stereotyping than anything in The Jungle Book. But as a little gay kid, Disney movies were all I got to see at the cinema and I related to Dumbo as a "queer" character, who got abused for being different and who comes into his own by the end. The racial coding of the crows, who are sympathetic characters and who help Dumbo to realise his potential but who are a representation of a racist pun, went over my head.

I'm into classic movies and even more questionably, into vintage exploitation films. Something to come to terms with (or not) is that 20th century art and entertainment can be problematic. These films will share outdated and/or offensive views on race, LGBT+ values, women and other civil right issues when judged from a 21st century perspective. It's necessary to acknowledge racism, homophobia, misogyny, etc in those films but within reason, everyone has to decide for themselves what they'll watch or what they'll "cancel". The Jungle Book can be read as racially coded, the villain of The Lion King can be read as stereotypically gay and the old Disney princess movies are plainly sexist. I don't endorse the dodgy representations in those films, I regard them educational in regard to historical representation of oppressed groups and minorities in popular culture. I also believe there is a difference between films like The Jungle Book, where the subtext lends itself to interpretation and films which are outright racist, like Song of the South, which Disney have now locked in a vault never to be released again.

Good podcast on racism in Disney movies and classic Hollywood in general here:


see i was having a weird conversation with yank friend about songs in the south and thought i was having mandela effect about having see it as a kid
it was never banned in the united kingdom/Ireland as i found after a bit of searching

amazing they never released it in the states but thought it was ok for home video internationally
 
Wait, what’s wrong with Lion King?
Marion’s not seen it but thinks it’s racist, so it must be racist. So you must be a racist for liking it. Obvs.

They have special powers, being so much better than most people they don’t even have to watch a film or read a book to know that’s it racist. All hail them, in my opinion they should be minister for culture permanently with those skills.
 
see i was having a weird conversation with yank friend about songs in the south and thought i was having mandela effect about having see it as a kid
it was never banned in the united kingdom/Ireland as i found after a bit of searching

amazing they never released it in the states but thought it was ok for home video internationally
Sorry - I literally haven't understood what you mean.
 
Donald Bluth, who left a minor position as an animator at Disney to set himself up as a writer, director and CEO of a company in direct competition to Disney was not Disney. You can count that in as much as you like and you still will be wrong. Bluth regarded himself as very different to Disney.
bluth and ten other ex disney people.
 
Sorry - I literally haven't understood what you mean.

the US fella i know was quite sure the Songs of the Sounds have never been released by Disney onto home video at any time

turns out they released the deeply racist movie internationally in europe and Uk/Ireland in 1982 and 1989

weird it was to racist for america in the 80's and fine for europe

:p
 
Last edited:
Marion’s not seen it but thinks it’s racist, so it must be racist. So you must be a racist for liking it. Obvs.

They have special powers, being so much better than most people they don’t even have to watch a film or read a book to know that’s it racist. All hail them, in my opinion they should be minister for culture permanently with those skills.
Who’s Marion :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom