Go on, see if you can think it through.
. . . is where the plan goes wrong.which could be any name if you signed up for a pre-paid credit card
. . . is where the plan goes wrong.
Not really. Aren't they registered to an address??
They're fucking shit bikes though, why bother nicking them?
It's not a "flaw". It's a balance between being responsible and accessibility, and it's a process as well. On the one hand there's you going on about nicking them, and just above there's someone else who thinks it's "middle class" . . .yeah yeah... theory is TFL will write it off.
But it's just a flaw I'm highlighting.
Boris has already announced he's getting another few thousand bikes to expand it to Mainline stations.
Evening Standard said:Mr Johnson also wants to expand the scheme in east London for the 2012 Games, although cycling is banned inside the Olympic Park.
It's not a "flaw". It's a balance between being responsible and accessibility, and it's a process as well. On the one hand there's you going on about nicking them, and just above there's someone else who thinks it's "middle class" . . .
If it doesn't work out well, they'll presumably exclude pre-paid and debit cards.
That was me....and just above there's someone else who thinks it's "middle class" . . .
It's not a "flaw". It's a balance between being responsible and accessibility, and it's a process as well. On the one hand there's you going on about nicking them, and just above there's someone else who thinks it's "middle class" . . .
If it doesn't work out well, they'll presumably exclude pre-paid and debit cards.
What is the difference?
Aren't banks more likely to let you go over your limit, in order to charge you fees for doing so?
I can understand not accepting these anonymous prepaid cards, for the reasons mentioned about difficulty in tracing the person if they steal the bike.
But why are debit cards less "good" than credit cards?
More people have a debit card than have a credit card.
A debit card takes money out of someone's main bank account. In the case of both debit and credit cards, if TFL tried to take £300 out if the bike disappears, it may or may not work, depending if the hirer has any money in their bank / an overdraft facility / is below their credit limit.
What is the difference?
Giles..
That was me.
Jenny Jones of the London Assembly has suggested the current charges could put some low-income Londoners off the scheme completely.
I watched it and she doesn't directly address your claim. She does compare costs with other cities but you could do that with anything from housing to tube travel as well and London would come out as more expensive.I struggle to see how this disadvantages those on low-income when it's cheaper than public transport alternatives?
I struggle to see how this disadvantages those on low-income when it's cheaper than public transport alternatives?
One example, roughly calculated as I’m on my way out:
A significant number of people on benefits don’t have a bank account and have their benefits paid into a post office card account (lets assume borisbike’s now accept these) Unless you have the £48 to pay the annual membership up front you’ll either have to pay £5 per week or £1 a day to access the scheme - compare these cost with a subsidized weekly bus pass of £8.30.
Still, the option would be nice - don't ya think?So my guess is they'll get a bus. These bikes aren't exactly an essential part of daily life are they...
After watching the video I sent her an email and in her reply she acknowledged the charges were a concern and for those without a credit card the scheme was in inaccessible. The green group our putting together a report for TFL from all the comments she gets and hopes to see improvements quite rapidly.