Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Barclays/TFL cycle hire scheme in London

I used my debit card to register, so the person who said something about credit card is not correct.
oh I am no way middle class.
I am a working class immigrant.:p
 
Go on, see if you can think it through.

Well other than sending a letter to whichever address you used to sign up with and continually chasing the name on the card which you provided (which could be any name if you signed up for a pre-paid credit card) - I don't know how they account for it.

I know with rental cars it comes under insurance paid for and guaranteed by photocopies of driving licenses etc - but this seems too easy to get away with, especially if you're a foreigner with no fixed UK address. How they gonna chase you up? Interpol? :D
 
So the short answer is, they can't do anything but chase the details they hold on account :facepalm:

Let's see how many bikes end up going missing before the system is forced to change and/or the cost is passed onto bus/tube passengers etc.
 
Not really. Aren't they registered to an address??

Yes, but who's address? I could register a card to any address - doesn't need to be a credit check against it or anything linked to it. I could register to my mate's nan's brother-in-law's place and TFL would be sent on a merry-go-round of chasing up someone who could just cancel their card once they got the bike and disappear forever.

And then there's still the question of foreigners. I can hardly see them spending money on international revenue collection agencies for the sake of £300. It'd cost them more than that to try and retrieve the cash.
 
They're fucking shit bikes though, why bother nicking them?

Well, quite. But all kinds of crap bikes get nicked all the time. If someone works out they could punt them on for £40/£50 outside of London or something - it could be worth doing.
 
yeah yeah... theory is TFL will write it off.

But it's just a flaw I'm highlighting. A possibility. Can't see who'd want to buy a nicked Boris-bike myself either - but stranger things have happened.
 
Boris has already announced he's getting another few thousand bikes to expand it to Mainline stations.
 
yeah yeah... theory is TFL will write it off.

But it's just a flaw I'm highlighting.
It's not a "flaw". It's a balance between being responsible and accessibility, and it's a process as well. On the one hand there's you going on about nicking them, and just above there's someone else who thinks it's "middle class" . . .


If it doesn't work out well, they'll presumably exclude pre-paid and debit cards.
 
Boris has already announced he's getting another few thousand bikes to expand it to Mainline stations.

It's just a proposal and talks are only in 'early stages' apparently. Also this is subject to TFL approving the £81 Million required. No word at all on if it will roll out any further west than Kensington. Meanwhile in the east...

Evening Standard said:
Mr Johnson also wants to expand the scheme in east London for the 2012 Games, although cycling is banned inside the Olympic Park.
:facepalm:
 
It's not a "flaw". It's a balance between being responsible and accessibility, and it's a process as well. On the one hand there's you going on about nicking them, and just above there's someone else who thinks it's "middle class" . . .


If it doesn't work out well, they'll presumably exclude pre-paid and debit cards.

Well, I agree - its a balance they've struck and a risk they've accepted. I'm just pointing out the possible pitfalls is all. I'm just concerned that if it does fail, they'll end up paying higher insurance premiums funded by a hike in the costs (or it will get passed on to bus/tube passengers).

Maybe there is no win win situation. It would totally suck for those on low incomes, or without £300 to spare having to freeze this amount on their card every time they want to hire a bike. I expect they've studied he Paris system and decided on the way forward.
 
...and just above there's someone else who thinks it's "middle class" . . .
That was me.

Jenny Jones of the London Assembly has suggested the current charges could put some low-income Londoners off the scheme completely.


I stand corrected on the needing a credit card to register, I was misinformed.
 
It's not a "flaw". It's a balance between being responsible and accessibility, and it's a process as well. On the one hand there's you going on about nicking them, and just above there's someone else who thinks it's "middle class" . . .


If it doesn't work out well, they'll presumably exclude pre-paid and debit cards.

I can understand not accepting these anonymous prepaid cards, for the reasons mentioned about difficulty in tracing the person if they steal the bike.

But why are debit cards less "good" than credit cards?

More people have a debit card than have a credit card.

A debit card takes money out of someone's main bank account. In the case of both debit and credit cards, if TFL tried to take £300 out if the bike disappears, it may or may not work, depending if the hirer has any money in their bank / an overdraft facility / is below their credit limit.

What is the difference?

Giles..
 
Aren't banks more likely to let you go over your limit, in order to charge you fees for doing so?

If they do this, they could do it with both debit AND credit cards, couldn't they?

Pretty much all card transactions nowadays are authorised online to your bank, so the bank can decline a transaction that goes over a set limit.

When people go over their overdraft limits, its usually because of direct debits, cheques, standing orders etc.
 
I can understand not accepting these anonymous prepaid cards, for the reasons mentioned about difficulty in tracing the person if they steal the bike.

But why are debit cards less "good" than credit cards?

More people have a debit card than have a credit card.

A debit card takes money out of someone's main bank account. In the case of both debit and credit cards, if TFL tried to take £300 out if the bike disappears, it may or may not work, depending if the hirer has any money in their bank / an overdraft facility / is below their credit limit.

What is the difference?

Giles..

Quite a bit, once you authorise a Credit Card payment, I challenge you to take it back. You can cancel the card and in the future, someone charges you to that cancelled card, you'll still get sent letters asking for the money and it'll get move to a debt collector and they'll take you to court to get the money back. Not so for a debit card.
 
That was me.

Jenny Jones of the London Assembly has suggested the current charges could put some low-income Londoners off the scheme completely.

I watched it and she doesn't directly address your claim. She does compare costs with other cities but you could do that with anything from housing to tube travel as well and London would come out as more expensive.

I struggle to see how this disadvantages those on low-income when it's cheaper than public transport alternatives?
 
Had my first go on one the other day - I'm used to riding my own bike so the heaviness and slowness took a bit of getting used to.

Then I suffered the indignity whilst on my own bike to be overtaken by someone on a Boris Bike :oops:
 
I watched it and she doesn't directly address your claim. She does compare costs with other cities but you could do that with anything from housing to tube travel as well and London would come out as more expensive.I struggle to see how this disadvantages those on low-income when it's cheaper than public transport alternatives?

After watching the video I sent her an email and in her reply she acknowledged the charges were a concern and for those without a credit card the scheme was in inaccessible. The green group our putting together a report for TFL from all the comments she gets and hopes to see improvements quite rapidly.
 
I struggle to see how this disadvantages those on low-income when it's cheaper than public transport alternatives?

One example, roughly calculated as I’m on my way out:

A significant number of people on benefits don’t have a bank account and have their benefits paid into a post office card account (lets assume borisbike’s now accept these) Unless you have the £48 to pay the annual membership up front you’ll either have to pay £5 per week or £1 a day to access the scheme - compare these cost with a subsidized weekly bus pass of £8.30.
 
If the person is at or near their limit, then if TFL tried to charge an extra £300, it would just be declined. Haven't you ever had a credit card transaction declined because you are at your limit?

Giles..
 
One example, roughly calculated as I’m on my way out:

A significant number of people on benefits don’t have a bank account and have their benefits paid into a post office card account (lets assume borisbike’s now accept these) Unless you have the £48 to pay the annual membership up front you’ll either have to pay £5 per week or £1 a day to access the scheme - compare these cost with a subsidized weekly bus pass of £8.30.

So my guess is they'll get a bus. These bikes aren't exactly an essential part of daily life are they...
 
After watching the video I sent her an email and in her reply she acknowledged the charges were a concern and for those without a credit card the scheme was in inaccessible. The green group our putting together a report for TFL from all the comments she gets and hopes to see improvements quite rapidly.

She needs to get her facts straight before expressing her opinion.
 
Back
Top Bottom