Reno
The In Kraut
...at home you also won't have the option to watch this proper 3D and that's what it was designed for.
Avatar (James Cameron) [SPOILERS]
- Thread starter The Octagon
- Start date
...at home you also won't have the option to watch this proper 3D and that's what it was designed for.
krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
Didn't Flash Gordon (1980) have a bit of that? I was going to say Bespin from Empire Strikes Back but that's a city, not an island...
Here some lovely Roger Dean in the meantime
kyser_soze
Hawking's Angry Eyebrow
Re: Flash...sort of, but that was bits of planet, Ming having generously blown Arboria into bits and then used his tech to string the bits back together, kinda like the world in Adam Roberts Splinter...
krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
TrippyLondoner
Well-Known Member
I've seen clips of it on the news, doesn't look like the kinda movie i would want to watch but then again i don't like movies as much as most people.
Getting abit sick of hearing how its 'the most expensive movie ever made', just leads me to think that's all there is to say about it!
Getting abit sick of hearing how its 'the most expensive movie ever made', just leads me to think that's all there is to say about it!
krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
I've seen clips of it on the news, doesn't look like the kinda movie i would want to watch but then again i don't like movies as much as most people.
Ach, that's just the money hype. They said that about all of Cameron's later films...
Kid_Eternity
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
The four minutes I saw, admittedly there's no context plot wise, weren't that impressive in terms of action sequence, acting, or graphics. The Smurfs just look to computer graphicy...
ATOMIC SUPLEX
Member Since: 1985 Post Count: 3
From the clips I have seen it looks terrible and the plot, though it sounds worthy, also sounds pretty boring. Has anyone seen it yet?
All that CGI, uh. I just don't think it looks good enough yet. It looks like CGI which I guess is not what it is supposed to look like.
All that CGI, uh. I just don't think it looks good enough yet. It looks like CGI which I guess is not what it is supposed to look like.
ChrisFilter
Like a boss.
ChrisFilter
Like a boss.
Could they ever look like a real species? Our minds would always associate them with CGI no mater how 'real'.
Stop moaning. Just enjoy it
Kid_Eternity
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Could they ever look like a real species? Our minds would always associate them with CGI no mater how 'real'.
Stop moaning. Just enjoy it
The Narn in Babylon 5 looked good and were believable as aliens and no CGI was used...what's to enjoy if it's shit?
ATOMIC SUPLEX
Member Since: 1985 Post Count: 3
Yes here.
I wonder if it is one of those LOTR type things. All the reviews for that were that it was fantastic, when in fact it was a steaming pile of shit.
IMO of course.
ChrisFilter
Like a boss.
ChrisFilter
Like a boss.
The Narn in Babylon 5 looked good and were believable as aliens and no CGI was used...what's to enjoy if it's shit?
I don't know what that is other than an Indian bread.
Have you read the reviews? They're very, very good - nearly to a man.
Would help if they didn't look like pointy smurfs tbf.
TrippyLondoner
Well-Known Member
I prefer not to listen to the reviews, they're usually full of shit.
krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
HERESY
I can watch LotR over and over again.
I love an epic, me.
yes.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
There was something about this on Breakfast News this morning. It looks dreadful.
TrippyLondoner
Well-Known Member
It really fucking does.
ChrisFilter
Like a boss.
How much longer will people on message boards keep whining on about CGI.
It's here to stay, get used to it.
By all accoutns the film looks breathtaking when seen where and how it should be seen: on a huge screen in 3d, not on breakfast television.
Indeed.
Seems the excellent reviews haven't put off the moaners.
krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
How much longer will people on message boards keep whining on about CGI.
It's here to stay, get used to it.
By all accoutns the film looks breathtaking when seen where and how it should be seen: on a huge screen in 3d, not on breakfast television.
Probably the same people who moaned about CDs replacing vinyl...
I suppose every time it is used badly.How much longer will people on message boards keep whining on about CGI.
TrippyLondoner
Well-Known Member
How much longer will people on message boards keep whining on about CGI.
It's here to stay, get used to it.
By all accoutns the film looks breathtaking when seen where and how it should be seen: on a huge screen in 3d, not on breakfast television.
I'm not fussed about CGI, i'm used to it in doctor who now atleast. Its just that sort of film looks like overhyped rubbish. Not my thing, is all.
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
I'm not talking about its appearance. I mean it doesn't look like the kind of thing I'd be interested in.How much longer will people on message boards keep whining on about CGI.
It's here to stay, get used to it.
By all accoutns the film looks breathtaking when seen where and how it should be seen: on a huge screen in 3d, not on breakfast television.
Reno
The In Kraut
Well, this is not the case where it's used badly. Go and whinge about 2012 instead.
Kid_Eternity
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
krtek a houby
Merry Xmas!
They don't look like smurfs. Unless you think all blue people look the same 
Similar threads
