Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

...and Yemen!

On MEE Yemeni Factions, Saudi Arabia Escalate Aimless War
...
Saleh’s increasing role in Sanaa’s government represents a shift. In March 2015, at the beginning of the war, the former president positioned himself as the ultimate gatekeeper of Yemeni politics, arguing that only he could put Yemen back together again. He called upon the Saudis to negotiate only days after the first bombs fell on Sanaa. Nobody paid attention because everyone knew that Saleh’s solution would include restoring Saleh to Yemen’s leadership, and because it appeared the Houthis were in charge in Sanaa, not Saleh.

However, with the creation of the Supreme Political Committee, and now the appointment of a new prime minister, Saleh is gambling on one side of the conflict instead of playing dealmaker among all. Following Hadi’s orders to move the Central Bank of Yemen to Aden, Sammad announced the appointment of Abdelaziz bin Habtour to form a new government in Sanaa. Bin Habtour is a southern academic, and a member of Saleh’s ruling party. He is a southern secularist, far from any of the political currents of the northern Zaydi Shiite Houthis. His appointment diminishes the profile of the Houthis in Sanaa’s politics and is a clear indication of Saleh’s growing role in directing affairs in Sanaa.

For Saleh, the appointment of bin Habtour is particularly savory. Bin Habtour denounced the Houthi coup in 2014, was appointed governor of Aden by Hadi in December 2014, and greeted Hadi in Aden when he fled house arrest by the Houthis in Sanaa in January 2015. Now he is back in Sanaa and leading Saleh’s new government. Bin Habtour’s appointment is ironic not only because he was formerly close to Hadi, but also because Hadi’s prime minister, Ahmed Obeid Bin Dagher, followed the opposite path. Bin Dagher was a key supporter of Saleh in the General People’s Congress even after the Houthi coup. Bin Dagher only left Saleh after the Saudi bombing campaign began in March 2015. Hadi stole Saleh’s key man, and Saleh has now returned the favor.
...
Saleh advances politically in Sanaa.

Main point of the article is neither side appears able to govern. That is perhaps a little even handed.

Hadi after a year of holding Aden is still living in the KSA and there is no real imprint of his governance there. Aden's plagued with terrorist incidents. When he's in Yemen he travels between heavily guarded compounds by helicopter for safety. The regime side here is a very divided constellation of often not complementary interests. They share the rebels as an enemy and sometimes have simply been rented. While some action has been taken against them AQAP remains a serious problem in the South. It was reported as actually doing a better job of delivering aid to towns near to starvation than the government. After the Arab Spring Hadi's was elected but in a rigged election in which he was the sole candidate. He proved to a corrupt continuity ruler who favoured the same Yemeni elites and failed to pass promised reforms. He didn't have the loyalty of much of the army that remained Saleh's. His government fell and he fled the country. He's bombed his own people or rather had the GCC do it on his behalf. This isn't the first time; he did that as Saleh's defence minister. He's been an obstacle in peace talks and appears to favour escalating the war. He's just seized the central bank as a tool of economic warfare with almost no means to use its resources to help a population on the verge of famine. His legitimacy rests on international support that isn't much more than pandering to the GCC.

Consider Assad's red handed claim to legitimacy in Syria: the evil bugger has never lost control of the the major cities and still resides by the capital. He can claim to rule 70% of Syria's people perhaps half of them by reluctant consent and has a functioning if very corrupt and authoritarian state. Perhaps half his lousy conscript army has died defending him. It's mostly remained loyal to him with only a rash of defections in the lower ranks. The revolt against him is heavily backed by foreigners and crawling with Salafi-Jihadis. More favourably in comparison with Hadi in over 5 years of civil war he and his allies have killed over a 100K civilians clinging to power whereas Hadi's side have maybe killed 3K civilians in a year and a half. And that equation might not look so good in a couple of years time if the Hadi regime tries to butcher its way to Sanaa or Yemen collapses into a devastating famine. And let's remember Obama confident in the regime's imminent demise consigned Assad to the R2P trash bin of the monstrous and the UN was talking war crimes after just five months of the revolt well before the total butchers bill in Syria reached the level of Yemen now in fact 2K civilians had died in protests some of which were rather violent. For another regional comparison during the recent coup the Egyptian security forces killed over 600 civilians in one day when ejecting a democratically elected if unpopular MB government.

On the other hand both the awful but wily Saleh and the ultra-reactionary Great Satan hating Houthis have evident popular support in the North. This is partly because of all the GCC bombing that we support and are widely assigned blamed for by the population. The capital Sanaa is chaotic but has something that looks more like a government that might reach terms with the rest of Yemen.
 
On USNI News USS Mason Fired 3 Missiles to Defend From Yemen Cruise Missiles Attack
...
While the Pentagon will not confirm details of Mason’s engagement, the use of both missiles by the U.S. is, “very significant,” Bryan Clark, a naval analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments and former aide to retired former-Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert, told USNI News on Monday.

“It might be the first time the SM-2 used against an actual threat for which it was designed,” Clark said.
“It’s definitely the first time ESSM has been used… This is obviously a huge deal.”

The SM-2s – more than two decades old – were specifically designed to tackle Cold War cruise missile threats to a guided-missile destroyer, much like the ones Iran has presumably given to the Houthis in Yemen.

Last week a Houthi-launched cruise missile caused significant damage to the UAE-leased HSV Swift – an unarmed aluminum high-speed transport vessel used to move supplies and wounded in the region, UAE officials said. UAE is part of a Saudi Arabia led coalition that has fought against the Iran-backed Shi’a Houthis in Yemen since last year.

While U.S. sources haven’t confirmed the type of missiles, open source naval analyst and retired Navy Capt. Chris Carlson told USNI News on Monday the damage on Swift appears to be from the warhead used in a Chinese-built C-802 anti-ship missile (NATO reporting name CSS-N-8 Saccade). The C-802 is based on Cold War-era French technology.

Specifically, the damage on Swift indicates the missile had an explosively formed penetrator (EFP) warhead – a well-known feature of the C-802. An EFP expands on impact launching additional pieces of shrapnel once the missile has penetrated the outer skin of a target around its circumference.
...
Older folks may remember the sea skimming French Exocet slamming into the side of HMS Sheffield. She sunk some days later.

The warhead on a C-802 weighs 165kg like the old Exocet and it has a operational range of 120km. The Iranian version is called Noor. HA shocked the Israelis when they used one on the corvette INS Hanit in the 06 war killing 4 sailors.

If the above snip is accurate these are very serious attacks. A signifiant escalation probably with a IRGC/HA connection. I doubt it's some khat chewing Houthi tribesman firing one of these things at the US Navy.
 
In respect of the targeting of a US ship there is speculation that it could have been 'friendly fire' or possibly even a false flag.

Screen Shot 2016-10-12 at 19.48.00.png

Screen Shot 2016-10-12 at 19.50.44.png
 
Statement by Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook on USS Mason > U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE > News Release View

For the second time in four days, USS Mason responded to an incoming missile threat while conducting routine operations in international waters off the Red Sea coast of Yemen. At about 6 p.m. local time today (11 a.m. EDT), the ship detected at least one missile that we assess originated from Houthi-controlled territory near Al Hudaydah, Yemen. The ship employed defensive countermeasures, and the missile did not reach USS Mason. There was no damage to the ship or its crew. USS Mason will continue its operations. Those who threaten our forces should know that U.S. commanders retain the right to defend their ships, and we will respond to this threat at the appropriate time and in the appropriate manner.
 

The US usually keeps such skepticism private and publicly endorses Saudi fears. Well they may be coming true as folk often find who charge in with all guns blazing to suppress a remote threat. Look at what we conjured in Iraq for fear of a few chemical weapons or another lunge at our energy reserves.

There's always been some IRGC/HA activity in Yemen but these attacks are the first real red flag that Iran is prepared to up its seed corn investment despite being busy elsewhere. You couldn't get more blatant than what looks like pretty big powerful Noor anti-shipping missiles being fired at UAE and US military vessels in a very strategic strait. It looks like the GCC blockade is somewhat more porous than anticipated. That's a really big effective fuck you. These attacks come just as the war looks to be escalating which suits Iran as this distracting Saudi war of choice keeps the GCC heat off the main project in Syria as it comes to a tipping point. Add to that a large part of the Northern Yemeni population blames the Great Satan for the brutal Saudi bombing campaign which is Khomeinist revolutionary gravy worth exploiting. With Obama dithering after the blatant massacre in Sanaa it's just the time to invoke direct US strikes against Houthi turf. I recall an interview with an HA fighter happily anticipating plinking Saudi armour in the easily defended Yemeni highlands. The Iranians are famously patient plotters but that day may be coming.
 

...
In the north, the continued perception of the Saudi-led military coalition as the greater adversary has allowed the Houthis and their allies among Saleh’s backers to solidify their somewhat quixotic alliance, formalizing their ties with each other despite continuing underlying tensions. In the south, however, where the Houthis have largely been expelled, the common enemy is no longer there to unify and once-hushed tensions between southern separatist factions, anti-Houthi pro-unity factions and the internationally-recognized government itself have left the strategic port city of Aden—ostensibly Yemen’s temporary capital—a powder keg, even amidst continued Emirati-backed efforts to stabilize the city. While a number of members of the internationally recognized government have relocated to the city, they are all but imprisoned in a heavily fortified compound, unable to travel in the city.

Amidst the swirling and multifaceted tensions, peace talks have stalled, risking devolution into a perfunctory exercise in political theater. And even as the humanitarian crisis has descended into famine, international attention has remained elsewhere — despite the deep British and American involvement in bolstering the operations of the Saudi-led coalition with intelligence and military assistance.
...
A fair summary.

It is odd that Yemen is so easily swept under the carpet The West works itself into a state of hysteria about East Aleppo and we are poised to impose an even bigger siege on Mosul.
 

A fair summary.

It is odd that Yemen is so easily swept under the carpet The West works itself into a state of hysteria about East Aleppo and we are poised to impose an even bigger siege on Mosul.

no it isn't.

there are priorities for news, and yemen doesn't really come up the top because of its location, because it has been going some time and no one likes joining something halfway through.
 
Last edited:
Indeed it is not.

E2a I see you added to your post. I would just like to also add that imo it's largely ignored due to allegiances with Saudi Arabia and the massive profits being made mainly by UK and US arms manufacturers. Part also of the reason why I felt Boris Johnson's call for demonstrations outside the Russian embassy with regard to Syria completely hypocritical.
 
Last edited:
no it isn't.

there are priorities for news, and yemen doesn't really come up the top because of its location, because it has been going some time and no one likes joining something halfway through.
It's also remote and difficult to get to, and the foreign press corps can't easily relax poolside after a busy day of reporting the humanitarian tragedy.
 
no it isn't.

there are priorities for news, and yemen doesn't really come up the top because of its location, because it has been going some time and no one likes joining something halfway through.
Ah you mean its not "news" because it would be new as Yemen's been generally ignored and it's got the KSA with our oil reserves sitting on top of it rather than beneath it with lots of tankers going round the strait at the bottom of the Arabian Penisular. So unlike the long on and off stalemate in strategic (well for the Iranians) Syria.

An odd argument as the long running drama with distant Baghdad also vanished out of our headlines to be replaced by Syria after the US withdrawal despite it getting ever more lively up to the fall of Mosul when Obama could no longer ignore it. The Arab Spring in Yemen was rather well covered as I recall compared to the subsequent war.

I think what gets headlines has got more to do with our overstretched journalists mostly just regurgitating government press releases and so often ending up with a front page output worthy of Russia Today.
 
Ah you mean its not "news" because it would be new as Yemen's been generally ignored and it's got the KSA with our oil reserves sitting on top of it rather than beneath it with lots of tankers going round the strait at the bottom of the Arabian Penisular. So unlike the long on and off stalemate in strategic (well for the Iranians) Syria.

An odd argument as the long running drama with distant Baghdad also vanished out of our headlines to be replaced by Syria after the US withdrawal despite it getting ever more lively up to the fall of Mosul when Obama could no longer ignore it. The Arab Spring in Yemen was rather well covered as I recall compared to the subsequent war.

I think what gets headlines has got more to do with our overstretched journalists mostly just regurgitating government press releases and so often ending up with a front page output worthy of Russia Today.
where are 'our overstretched journalists'? not bloody sanaa, that's for sure. and so...
 
where are 'our overstretched journalists'? not bloody sanaa, that's for sure. and so...
There's not many in Syria either. It's far too dangerous and there aren't that many foreign correspondents with a budget anymore. If they are away from their desks they are sitting in press briefings.

Guess what Iran's balanced and fair Press TV's headline is US, Britain in front line of Saudi crimes in Yemen: Iran cleric. That is what their government is pumping up the outrage on. The effect in their state controlled press isn't much different in our free media. Aleppo does make the front page as well but unsurprisingly not as a humanitarian crisis more a little Russian diplomatic difficulty and a quandary for us. Radio HA Al Manar News is headlining with Iraq’s Mobilization Forces Pledges Preventing ISIL in Mosul from Exiting into Syria’s Raqqa and only mentions Lavrov's difficulties while it has a go at the Saudis in Yemen. The effect in their controlled press isn't much different in our free media.

The Soviets used to comment on the US press slavishly following state lines without a single journo ever having to be sent to the Gulag for a spot of re-adjustment by way of encouragement. I think it's got worse since all the press operations cut back on doing real out in the world journalism.
 
On TNI Entanglement in Yemen and the Logic of War
...
What is being demonstrated in Yemen, besides being a serious problem in its own right, carries important lessons for policy toward internal conflict and external interventions in other places, such as Syria. One lesson is that supposedly limited interventions are likely—for reasons that include the need to protect one's own service members—to become much less limited. (This dimension is routinely overlooked in discussions of establishing a no-fly zone or “safe zone” in Syria.) Another lesson is that U.S. military interventions in this region have created more adversaries of the United States than they have eliminated.

Yet another lesson concerns the folly of defining Middle Eastern politics in terms of some grand alignment of opposing forces and then getting directly involved in any conflict that can be construed as being a clash of such forces. Even if the Yemeni civil war were a front in some kind of Iranian-led regional offensive—and as noted above, it isn't—getting dragged into that war is less likely to serve U.S. interests than Iranian ones. Letting its regional rival Saudi Arabia bleed in the quagmire that the Saudi intervention has produced may have been another motive for whatever aid Iran has given the Houthis. There certainly is no advantage for the United States in being involved as well.
Pillar's slightly off here, the Houthis at least in their "Death to America! Death to Israel! Death to the Joos!" were at least in Khomeinist rhetoric rather anti-American. And you could say despite their stout opposition to AQAP taking the revolt down to Aden actually enabled what may be AQ's most dangerous branch by playing a big part in creating a great ungoverned space they have thrived in.

However he's right that the US has created a lot more enemies in Yemen. The US's CT drone campaign against AQAP was seen by some in Yemen as a violation of Yemeni sovereignty and may have contributed to Saleh's fall. You can also question the long US support of the Assad like Saleh but with a wily brain. By backing a barbarous air campaign there are now far more people in Northern Yemen that might with some cause see the US as the demonic trickster of the Iranian Revolutionary imagination. And that gives that once fairly empty Houthi chant power and meaning.

And now the US Navy involvement in the blockade has put US sailors in harms way and caused them to fire on Houthi territory in retaliation to what could have been a mass casualty strike. That's just as the US was considering the wisdom of continuing to give the KSA a blank check to bomb civilian gatherings. More Yemenis are likely to see the Iranians sending warships to the Red Sea as act of supportive defiance.

And that trend will make Iran more dangerously interested in Yemen. It's become more than a useful distraction for the fool led KSA from Syria. Because Iran is essentially a revolutionary actor that works from the grass roots up. In Iraq the rise of genocidal IS finally legitimated Iran's hand in the militias after decades of covert effort. In Yemen it's the Safavid fearing Saudis and their precision munitions that enable them. And by failing to rein in them in we have done the Iranians work for them more surely than a handful of IRGC and HA trainers.
 
On MEE Saudi-led coalition hit Yemen funeral due to 'inaccurate information'
...
The Joint Investigations Action Team (JIAT), which is made up of 14 military and legal experts from members of the Saudi-led coalition, delivered its final report into the incident on Saturday morning, urging legal action against those who led the bombing.

According to the report, the air strike was launched based on intelligence that said there were armed Houthi leaders attending the funeral.

"The intelligence was supplied by a body affiliated to the Yemeni chief of staff," the report said.

It is unclear whether the report urges legal action against the Yemeni officials who supplied the faulty intelligence, or against the coalition officials who launched the strike.

The report also urges members of the coalition to offer reparations to the victims, saying it will continue to work with "legitimate force," meaning supporters of President Abd Rabbuh Mansour Hadi, to probe further evidence.

However, it also accuses some parties of "exploiting the incident" and exaggerating the death toll, which officially stands at 140.

This is the first time that Saudi Arabia, which hosts the operations room for the coalition, has admitted culpability for the strike.

It initally said it had not launched any strikes in the area at the time of the funeral bombing.

Top Saudi commentators also alleged that the strike was a "conspiracy" by Houthi rebels to eliminate internal enemies.
...
It was the funeral of the rebel Interior Minister's father so the hall was inevitably crowded with HVTs when it got hit four times using US supplied 500lb MK-82 precision munitions. Saying first the Houthis done it themselves then Hadi's people made us do it is not remotely credible.,
 
where are 'our overstretched journalists'? not bloody sanaa, that's for sure. and so...
i hope I'm not bordering on consiraloonery, but i think that Hadi /KSA / US (and Saleh to an extend) have a strong interest in preventing news from spreading, as this conflict is not only a war against the Houthis and AQAP, but also against Arab Spring activists, the Southern Movement (Hirak), the socialist party in the north, southern separatists, and left over internationalists / socialists in the south.
in short, KSA are actively fighting a pro-democracy movement in their own backyard and prevent it from spreading across the peninsula and too much international knowledge and concern could be deeply embarrassing for its western backers (not that they've given too much of a shit about in the years / decades leading up to this mess).
 
i hope I'm not bordering on consiraloonery, but i think that Hadi /KSA / US (and Saleh to an extend) have a strong interest in preventing news from spreading, as this conflict is not only a war against the Houthis and AQAP, but also against Arab Spring activists, the Southern Movement (Hirak), the socialist party in the north, southern separatists, and left over internationalists / socialists in the south.
in short, KSA are actively fighting a pro-democracy movement in their own backyard and prevent it from spreading across the peninsula and too much international knowledge and concern could be deeply embarrassing for its western backers (not that they've given too much of a shit about in the years / decades leading up to this mess).
Well Both the UAE and the KSA do have considerable lobbying clout but its mainly expressed publicly in The West by Beltway think tanks and mouth pieces in our governments. This isn't a conspiracy theory parts of DC are referred to as Arab Occupied Territory by the Obama administration. A whole pack of US politicians have been bought off to pitch for these guys entirely legally and above board, such is the US system. That of course effects press coverage. If you want to smoke screen a problem in Yemen just make lots of noise about Syria though of course many of the same guys lobby vigorously for regime change in Damascus anyway.

That list contains very unlikely bed fellows: Arab Spring activists (particularly the MB inspired al-Islah party but also other Salafists all highly reactionary), the Southern Movement (Hirak), southern separatists, and left over internationalists / socialists in the south all did ally with the fallen despot Hadi and a good few rentable tribes to expel the Saleh-Houthi rebels from the South. AQAP and other Salafi-Jihadis joined them to some extent in places as well. It was a truly popular cause down there. That with the rebels expelled parts of this Southern alliance of enemies are now liable to fall to fighting would perhaps be more accurate. And yes the Hadi regime will want their almost total lack of control played down. Even the UAE and KSA have very different agendas in Yemen. The more competent UAE regarding Islamists of all kinds toxic and being more prone to partition off Aden and leave while it seems to be all about Princely face for the KSA. Meanwhile the unhappy US has serious worries about AQAP requiring not just an expanded US CT campaign but finally some sort of governance in the South that the unpopular Hadi appears quite unable to deliver.

It's rather surprising that the fallen despot Saleh's relationship with the Houthis (also highly reactionary Arab Spring activists) has proven durable in the North. The very corrupt Saleh was rather keen on bombing his own Zaidi people, which the Houthis are, as leader. He also had his Defence Minister Hadi bomb the Southern Separatists. Clan Saleh is slithering back to power in Sanaa's government.
 
On LWJ Analysis: Reading Tehran’s security establishment on the strike in Sanaa
...
Leading conservative dailies in Tehran – Kayhan and Vatan-e Emrooz – have respectively dubbed Saturday’s bombing “Sanaa’s Karbala” and “Yemen’s Karbala,” in their headlines. The reference to Karbala – the location where the grandson of the prophet Muhammad (Hussein ibn Ali) was martyred in 680 AD – is telling. The deployment of the term coincided with the annual holiday of Ashura, which mourns Hussein’s death. Thus, the Karbala reference elevates those who died in Sanaa to Hussein’s level by implying that they are martyrs. While suffering and martyrdom are key motifs in Shiite Islam, the two Iranian outlets also offer a distinctly political message with their religious allegory. Vatan-e Emroozreported death tolls as high as 500, likely aiming to incite greater vitriol against Saudi Arabia. AndKayhan, whose editor-in-chief is a confidant of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, has harshly criticized the U.S., the U.K., and Europe for equipping the Saudis with arms. The article in Kayhanfurther mocks the claim the West is the standard-bearer of human rights, and per its title, offers the events in Sanaa as “proof” of Western hypocrisy.

Iran’s military elite have expanded upon this line of criticism. Iran’s former Minister of Defense, Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi, told the press: “If human rights organizations don’t condemn the atrocities of the al-Saud in Yemen, this will definitely imprint a shameful mark on their record.” Turning to what he perceived to be the source of Saudi aggression, he said, “American support for the al-Saud has grown their boldness, more than in the past.” Another former Minister of Defense, Admiral Ali Shamkhani, who now serves as Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), also took to blaming America. Shamkhani exclaimed that, “America is a participant in the Saudi regime’s recent atrocities – meaning the bombing of a mourning ceremony in Yemen with weapons Washington provided – and must be held accountable.”

In condemning the attack, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) struck a similar tone. The IRGC issued a press release explicitly describing a “chain of the White House’s atrocities” which includes “Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, Libya, Bahrain, and in recent years…the oppressed and defenseless people of Yemen.”
...
Speaking of media smoke screens, this one is blowing all over the burning rubble of East Aleppo.

Notably little clear boasting about aid to Houthis but I detect some glee at rising revolutionary currents in Yemen. LWJ, a good friend of Israel, notes that aid to groups fighting the Joos is openly celebrated. Unlike them I don't think that's misdirection. The Iranians are not usually given to empty boasting unless it's a strategic deception. I think their military aid to the Houthis remains relatively slight and isn't worth bragging about as yet. The rhetoric reflects political support for the Houthis revolutionary project in the face of what plays well in Iran al Saud villainy.

Piece has a senior military advisor to the Supreme Leader calling Wahhabism an “English faith". Saudi high ups just bellow Dark Age insults like the Shia being "lower than dog and Jews!" far less imaginative.
 
I haven't followed this story so I have little idea of what's going on more broadly. A few points:

- modern US warships have far better countermeasures systems than we've seen used in historical conflicts (e.g. Falklands). Look up e.g. Phalanx CIWS. That's not to say there aren't vulnerabilities but it's not like it's only a matter of time before they're hit by one of these.

- that said, this seems to be something of an outlier in modern terms. I don't know exactly what was fired at them but in general these days the US finds itself having to defend itself against improvised and low-tech attacks, not comparatively exotic missiles and such

- with that in mind, I can't imagine the Yanks are too keen to report many details in case it aids these people tactically
 
On Al Monitor Will Obama push for Yemen cease-fire?
...
The damage of the override will also impact Yemeni diplomacy, unfortunately, because it poisons the atmosphere. Nonetheless, Washington needs to use all its leverage now before the conflict escalates further. The Iranians would be delighted to see America get even more bogged down in another war in the Middle East.

The international community is rightly concerned with the horrific tragedy in Aleppo. But it needs to be equally gripped by the tragedy unfolding in Sanaa, Taiz and Saada. The poorest Arabs are being blockaded by air and sea by the richest with our help. The coalition should unilaterally impose a open-ended cease-fire, allow an international investigation of the funeral bombing and lift the blockade. The United States should insist on no less.
Reckons the override of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act will seriously poison US-KSA relations.

Riedel I recall once said Obama could stop the Saudis bombing campaign with a phone call. That may be an exaggeration but it always was far more within his power than making a whit of difference in Syria.

There's been an awful lot of of US and UK posturing about peacemaking while simultaneously being extremely supportive of the GCC side to a point of making peace talks irrelevantly partisan. Like a far from defeated Assad the Houthi-Saleh axis was basically presented with terms of surrender in the last talks by a fallen government that does not look viable. Until the Russian intervention complicated Syria the way we behaved there wasn't much different. I would hope the latest Kerry initiative for a ceasefire is more genuine. I'm not sure if the Houthi-Saleh side is interested in anything but cutting up rough at the moment so we may just be covering the KSA's ample arse again.
 
On War Is Boring The Truth Is, America’s Been at War in Yemen for Years
But the enemy keeps changing

Short history of US military involvement in Yemen. The latest development following the Saudi massacre of mourners at the rebel Minister of The Interior's father's funeral has led someone to pick a fight with the US Navy. Saleh had promised retribution against the Saudis but for many in Yemen that distinction is a fine one.

I've read the CT campaign against AQAP, which involved not just air strikes but a long effort to build up a rather capable Yemeni military, also had a large British component that the UK public was largely kept in the dark about. It can be argued that this was overly focused on a symptom without due care and attention to the larger problem of Yemeni stability. However it was viewed as a big success not so long ago: the flagship campaign of the Obama era GWOT but perhaps rather revealing of a basic misunderstanding of terrorist proliferation.

This effort to degrade the very dangerous AQAP has been wrecked by the civil war as much of the military sided with their old boss Saleh in backing the Houthis. GCC air destroyed much of the Yemeni military's capability. That you do have to blame on the rebels over reaching and trying to grab Aden which triggered the KSA's hasty plunge into yet another war in its disorderly neighbour. With GCC assistance and a grab bag of allies the rebels have been pushed back North. However the fallen Hadi government has proven completely incapable of controlling of the "liberated" South. Not really even being in charge of Aden after a year. AQAP meanwhile thrived as never before. The GCC tardily has made some efforts against them but in the absence of a Yemeni state in the South this is probably just mowing the grass.

The US and UK priority probably should have been to help cobble together some sort of transitional government in Yemen. Instead we chose to pander to the Saudis while making a fast buck on arms sales. A very charitable reading of the war, if not the anointing of Hadi as PM, from Riyahd might see it as a mixed success. It's pretty much a disaster from our point of view. It does make me wonder about the seriousness of the GWOT as an enterprise.
 
On Reuters Exclusive: Iran steps up weapons supply to Yemen's Houthis via Oman - officials
...
Even U.S. officials warning of Iran's support for the Houthis acknowledge intelligence gaps in Yemen, where the U.S. posture has been sharply reduced since the start of the conflict. The sources all declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue.

"We are aware of a recent increased frequency of weapons shipments supplied by Iran, which are reaching the Houthis via the Omani border," a Western diplomat familiar with the conflict told Reuters.

Three U.S. officials confirmed that assertion.

One of those officials, who is familiar with Yemen, said that in the past few months there had been a noticeable increase in weapons-smuggling activity.

"What they're bringing in via Oman are anti-ship missiles, explosives..., money and personnel," the official said.

Another regional security source said the transfers included surface-to-surface short-range missiles and small arms.

A senior Iranian diplomat confirmed there had been a "sharp surge in Iran's help to the Houthis in Yemen" since May, referring to weapons, training and money.
...
Nothing conclusive about the anti-ship missiles.

You'd have to consider that the Houthis earlier in the year were in talks with the Saudis talking about distancing themselves from Iran. What the Houthis are not is Iranian stooges they are sometimes assumed to be. It's a very local Yemeni movement.
 
From MWI Bab al-Mandab: Hard Times at the Gate of Tears
...
Several strategic factors lend further complexity and importance to this situation. Most obviously, there is the Bab al-Mandab Strait itself, which is a critical route for trade between East Asia and Europe (and everywhere in between) — but also the key transit route for ships from Saudi Arabia’s Western Fleet, based in the Red Sea port of Jeddah. The entire length of the waterway is bounded on the eastern side by Yemen, which is essentially ungoverned and, as described, home to both local hostile forces and potential Iranian infiltrators. On its western banks, the strait is bordered by Djibouti, a reliable, Western-friendly partner whose naval capabilities are nonetheless nascent (and whose relations with Eritrea, its neighbor with significant coastline to its north, are shaky at best).
...
I think Iran sees Yemen as a very peripheral theatre. A useful distraction from Syria requiring a very low IRGC investment to keep an iron in the fire. Ideally they'd like the war to escalate but it may present other opportunities as well.

These attacks on shipping in Ban al Mandab come at the same time as the Russians are building up their forces in and off Syria to deter any US attempt to degrade Assad. Third World Iran's strategy usually includes a variety asymmetric threats. Threatening KSA commerce is often a priority. Demonstrating an ability to mess with Bab al Mandab via proxy might be rather useful.
 
Back
Top Bottom