CrabbedOne
Walking sideways snippily
On MEE Yemeni Factions, Saudi Arabia Escalate Aimless War
Main point of the article is neither side appears able to govern. That is perhaps a little even handed.
Hadi after a year of holding Aden is still living in the KSA and there is no real imprint of his governance there. Aden's plagued with terrorist incidents. When he's in Yemen he travels between heavily guarded compounds by helicopter for safety. The regime side here is a very divided constellation of often not complementary interests. They share the rebels as an enemy and sometimes have simply been rented. While some action has been taken against them AQAP remains a serious problem in the South. It was reported as actually doing a better job of delivering aid to towns near to starvation than the government. After the Arab Spring Hadi's was elected but in a rigged election in which he was the sole candidate. He proved to a corrupt continuity ruler who favoured the same Yemeni elites and failed to pass promised reforms. He didn't have the loyalty of much of the army that remained Saleh's. His government fell and he fled the country. He's bombed his own people or rather had the GCC do it on his behalf. This isn't the first time; he did that as Saleh's defence minister. He's been an obstacle in peace talks and appears to favour escalating the war. He's just seized the central bank as a tool of economic warfare with almost no means to use its resources to help a population on the verge of famine. His legitimacy rests on international support that isn't much more than pandering to the GCC.
Consider Assad's red handed claim to legitimacy in Syria: the evil bugger has never lost control of the the major cities and still resides by the capital. He can claim to rule 70% of Syria's people perhaps half of them by reluctant consent and has a functioning if very corrupt and authoritarian state. Perhaps half his lousy conscript army has died defending him. It's mostly remained loyal to him with only a rash of defections in the lower ranks. The revolt against him is heavily backed by foreigners and crawling with Salafi-Jihadis. More favourably in comparison with Hadi in over 5 years of civil war he and his allies have killed over a 100K civilians clinging to power whereas Hadi's side have maybe killed 3K civilians in a year and a half. And that equation might not look so good in a couple of years time if the Hadi regime tries to butcher its way to Sanaa or Yemen collapses into a devastating famine. And let's remember Obama confident in the regime's imminent demise consigned Assad to the R2P trash bin of the monstrous and the UN was talking war crimes after just five months of the revolt well before the total butchers bill in Syria reached the level of Yemen now in fact 2K civilians had died in protests some of which were rather violent. For another regional comparison during the recent coup the Egyptian security forces killed over 600 civilians in one day when ejecting a democratically elected if unpopular MB government.
On the other hand both the awful but wily Saleh and the ultra-reactionary Great Satan hating Houthis have evident popular support in the North. This is partly because of all the GCC bombing that we support and are widely assigned blamed for by the population. The capital Sanaa is chaotic but has something that looks more like a government that might reach terms with the rest of Yemen.
Saleh advances politically in Sanaa....
Saleh’s increasing role in Sanaa’s government represents a shift. In March 2015, at the beginning of the war, the former president positioned himself as the ultimate gatekeeper of Yemeni politics, arguing that only he could put Yemen back together again. He called upon the Saudis to negotiate only days after the first bombs fell on Sanaa. Nobody paid attention because everyone knew that Saleh’s solution would include restoring Saleh to Yemen’s leadership, and because it appeared the Houthis were in charge in Sanaa, not Saleh.
However, with the creation of the Supreme Political Committee, and now the appointment of a new prime minister, Saleh is gambling on one side of the conflict instead of playing dealmaker among all. Following Hadi’s orders to move the Central Bank of Yemen to Aden, Sammad announced the appointment of Abdelaziz bin Habtour to form a new government in Sanaa. Bin Habtour is a southern academic, and a member of Saleh’s ruling party. He is a southern secularist, far from any of the political currents of the northern Zaydi Shiite Houthis. His appointment diminishes the profile of the Houthis in Sanaa’s politics and is a clear indication of Saleh’s growing role in directing affairs in Sanaa.
For Saleh, the appointment of bin Habtour is particularly savory. Bin Habtour denounced the Houthi coup in 2014, was appointed governor of Aden by Hadi in December 2014, and greeted Hadi in Aden when he fled house arrest by the Houthis in Sanaa in January 2015. Now he is back in Sanaa and leading Saleh’s new government. Bin Habtour’s appointment is ironic not only because he was formerly close to Hadi, but also because Hadi’s prime minister, Ahmed Obeid Bin Dagher, followed the opposite path. Bin Dagher was a key supporter of Saleh in the General People’s Congress even after the Houthi coup. Bin Dagher only left Saleh after the Saudi bombing campaign began in March 2015. Hadi stole Saleh’s key man, and Saleh has now returned the favor.
...
Main point of the article is neither side appears able to govern. That is perhaps a little even handed.
Hadi after a year of holding Aden is still living in the KSA and there is no real imprint of his governance there. Aden's plagued with terrorist incidents. When he's in Yemen he travels between heavily guarded compounds by helicopter for safety. The regime side here is a very divided constellation of often not complementary interests. They share the rebels as an enemy and sometimes have simply been rented. While some action has been taken against them AQAP remains a serious problem in the South. It was reported as actually doing a better job of delivering aid to towns near to starvation than the government. After the Arab Spring Hadi's was elected but in a rigged election in which he was the sole candidate. He proved to a corrupt continuity ruler who favoured the same Yemeni elites and failed to pass promised reforms. He didn't have the loyalty of much of the army that remained Saleh's. His government fell and he fled the country. He's bombed his own people or rather had the GCC do it on his behalf. This isn't the first time; he did that as Saleh's defence minister. He's been an obstacle in peace talks and appears to favour escalating the war. He's just seized the central bank as a tool of economic warfare with almost no means to use its resources to help a population on the verge of famine. His legitimacy rests on international support that isn't much more than pandering to the GCC.
Consider Assad's red handed claim to legitimacy in Syria: the evil bugger has never lost control of the the major cities and still resides by the capital. He can claim to rule 70% of Syria's people perhaps half of them by reluctant consent and has a functioning if very corrupt and authoritarian state. Perhaps half his lousy conscript army has died defending him. It's mostly remained loyal to him with only a rash of defections in the lower ranks. The revolt against him is heavily backed by foreigners and crawling with Salafi-Jihadis. More favourably in comparison with Hadi in over 5 years of civil war he and his allies have killed over a 100K civilians clinging to power whereas Hadi's side have maybe killed 3K civilians in a year and a half. And that equation might not look so good in a couple of years time if the Hadi regime tries to butcher its way to Sanaa or Yemen collapses into a devastating famine. And let's remember Obama confident in the regime's imminent demise consigned Assad to the R2P trash bin of the monstrous and the UN was talking war crimes after just five months of the revolt well before the total butchers bill in Syria reached the level of Yemen now in fact 2K civilians had died in protests some of which were rather violent. For another regional comparison during the recent coup the Egyptian security forces killed over 600 civilians in one day when ejecting a democratically elected if unpopular MB government.
On the other hand both the awful but wily Saleh and the ultra-reactionary Great Satan hating Houthis have evident popular support in the North. This is partly because of all the GCC bombing that we support and are widely assigned blamed for by the population. The capital Sanaa is chaotic but has something that looks more like a government that might reach terms with the rest of Yemen.