Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Alex jones podcast

Bob the lost, I took notice, I gave some answers and so did you, you want to continue forever ? You did not convince me that nobody should have been fired

Editor tell that firefighter to fuck right off if you want. Watch the video, minute 17 :

"it was a little quiet, and my buddy Mike Curley he also found out that a lot of these people that were believed part of this conspiracy, of this whole thing, they called in sick that day, all the 500 of them called in sick that day, that's a fact, Hello, somebody knew "

Find him and talk to him tell him he does not know what he is talking if you want.
Yes there are many testimonies, the 9/11 report does not care about them
 
paimei01 said:
Bob the lost, I took notice, I gave some answers and so did you, you want to continue forever ? You did not convince me that nobody should have been fired

Editor tell that firefighter to fuck right off if you want. Watch the video, minute 17 :

"it was a little quiet, and my buddy Mike Curley he also found out that a lot of these people that were believed part of this conspiracy, of this whole thing, they called in sick that day, all the 500 of them called in sick that day, that's a fact, Hello, somebody knew "

Find him and talk to him tell him he does not know what he is talking if you want.
Yes there are many testimonies, the 9/11 report does not care about them
No you didn't you deluded pillock. You ignored the entire serries of posts that show that you haven't got a clue about the events on the day.
 
8den said:
He doesn't say how he knows but simply a friend told him so..
So it can be completely and utterly discounted, like all the usual moronic loon bullshit.

Why do you swallow uncorroborated claims and ignore the vast body of credible, documented testimony, paimei01?
 
paimei01 said:
"it was a little quiet, and my buddy Mike Curley he also found out that a lot of these people that were believed part of this conspiracy, of this whole thing, they called in sick that day, all the 500 of them called in sick that day, that's a fact, Hello, somebody knew "
Who the fuck is his "buddy", Mike Curley? What does he do? And how would he know anyway?

Have you any proof of "500 people" all unusually calling in sick"?
Have you any testimony from these people?
Do you know who any of them are?
Do you know who called them?
Do you have any credible evidence at all to back up this wild claim?

No? Then why do you believe it?
 
Payne Stewart's LearJet

Learjet%2045%20fom%20above%20over%20lake.jpg


Passengers: 6
destination: nowhere in particular, perfectly tracked all the way, no change of course, transponder on

Pentagon strike: A 767

b767delt.jpg


Passengers: 50+ IIRC
Destination: Washington DC. Plane changes course, all contact lost mysteriously

notice any difference in urgency?
 
Alex Jones is one of the few voices of freedom in the US media.
I heard him talking about Bill Gates on the James Whale show recently and he made alot of sense.
 
stelios69 said:
Alex Jones is one of the few voices of freedom in the US media.
Oh, you're one of those deluded, fact-free, evidence-untroubled, self-declared 'truthseekers' that thinks the 7/7 bombings were an evil inside job, aren't you?

No wonder you think Alex Jones makes sense.

:rolleyes:
 
The official 911 Commission investigations seems to be most unsatisfactory.

For example the commissions, executive Dirictor Phillip Zelikow had written books with Condoleeza Rice, hardly the most impartial person they could have found is it?

Its little wonder there are so many conspiracy theories, because there are real conspiracies to be seen everywhere.
 
paimei01 said:
Bob the lost, I took notice, I gave some answers and so did you, you want to continue forever ? You did not convince me that nobody should have been fired

Editor tell that firefighter to fuck right off if you want. Watch the video, minute 17 :

"it was a little quiet, and my buddy Mike Curley he also found out that a lot of these people that were believed part of this conspiracy, of this whole thing, they called in sick that day, all the 500 of them called in sick that day, that's a fact, Hello, somebody knew "

Find him and talk to him tell him he does not know what he is talking if you want.
Yes there are many testimonies, the 9/11 report does not care about them

10,000 people worked in the WTC. 500 not turning up one day would mean an absentee rate of 1%, any workplace I know would kill for that kind of statisitic. Why doesn't his mate mike list these five hundred names off and their significance in the conspiracy?


Oh and Jazzz, give over, I've provided a timeline that shows that within minutes of the transponder going off, NEADs and NORAD were alerting fighters.
 
So knowing that they had numerous serious warnings, and chose to ignore them, how can you dismiss the idea that they let the attacks happen?

I don't mean in terms of not intercepting the flights, I mean by that point it didn't matter whether the planes where shot down or not, they would have their terrorist attack.

I'm not saying it can be proved, but can you dismiss this for this reason, or would you entertain the possibility given the ignored warnings
 
EddyBlack said:
So knowing that they had numerous serious warnings, and chose to ignore them, how can you dismiss the idea that they let the attacks happen?
I do believe this topic has already been discussed in some considerable detail over several thousand posts on this very board.
 
EddyBlack said:
So knowing that they had numerous serious warnings, and chose to ignore them, how can you dismiss the idea that they let the attacks happen?

There was plenty of evidence of dozens of different attacks. It's not like they intercepted a morse transmittion saying Al Qaeda planning to strike using these three airlines, at these specific times, on this date.

Tell me Eddy, in your book, what should they have done before the attacks?

Suspended all air traffic? Round up people with Arabic names?
 
Editor, 8den, your right it was a pointless post I made.
There was no specific warnings, only a generalised warning with about 70 possible leads.
'Needle in a haystack' stuff really.
 
Good work though guys, you've really shone a lot of light on things, for examples 8den's c&p timeline.

The only thing that lingers for me, I don't think it has been touched upon properly, is it considered likely that the hijackers would be able to pilot those airliners without having done so before? Pretty skillful flying wasn't it?
 
And how does Norman Mineta's testimony fit into the timeline do you think? A big ask I know but if anybody's got an idea...
 
EddyBlack said:
Good work though guys, you've really shone a lot of light on things, for examples 8den's c&p timeline.

The only thing that lingers for me, I don't think it has been touched upon properly, is it considered likely that the hijackers would be able to pilot those airliners without having done so before? Pretty skillful flying wasn't it?

Hanjour the most experienced pilot, had over 600 hours in his log book, had a commerical's pilot's licence. As did several of the others. There was nothing complex about the flying. Line up your gps, fly to new york or washington, find your target. Aim. Accelerate. Why do you think it was pretty skillful flying?
 
Well I didn't know that - that would explain it I guess.

I heard that the manoevure pulled off at the Pentagon was pretty top level flying.
 
EddyBlack said:
Well I didn't know that - that would explain it I guess.

I heard that the manoevure pulled off at the Pentagon was pretty top level flying.

Eddy would you just take your fucking head out of your ass for five fucking minutes and stop believing what fucking bullshit conspiracy sites saying.

Look if they're lying about other shit, why should you assume they're not lying about the "top level flying"?

Spend an afternoon, around a site like this, 911myths.com

911myths.com. They have fascinating articles from qualified experts on all sorts of aspects of the conspiracy theories, like say a pilot like giulio bernacchia. I could hunt down the quote again but I'm tired of debunking the same tired worn out bullshit over and over again.

it wasn't "top level" flying eddie. Fact. Stop repeating inane fucking bullshit and educate yourself.
 

Eddie it's a 55 degree angle turn with a moderate degree of descent. You didn't have to be goose from fucking top gun to pull that off. Shit like that happens every time you get off the fucking ground.
 
8den said:
Look if they're lying about other shit, why should you assume they're not lying about the "top level flying"?

Spend an afternoon, around a site like this, 911myths.com...

it wasn't "top level" flying eddie. Fact. Stop repeating inane fucking bullshit and educate yourself.

I will check that out. I am in the middle of trying to debate some people on the prisonplanet forum and I was using you guys as my reference :D :oops:

But I will give you a rest from the 'repeating inane fucking bullshit' and do some of my own reading.
 
EddyBlack said:
I will check that out. I am in the middle of trying to debate some people on the prisonplanet forum and I was using you guys as my reference :D :oops:

But I will give you a rest from the 'repeating inane fucking bullshit' and do some of my own reading.

Tell you what Eddie you seem like a rational open minded bloke, who's open to changing his position based on the new information. That seperates you from 99% of conspiracy theorists who arrive at a predetermined conclusion, and alter, or ignore any facts that challenge this conclusion. Look at our Romanian friend here, he thinks no fighters were launched, and when confronted with evidence that challenges this assertion he shifts gears.

Look Eddie I apologise if I came off curt or obnoxious. In future if you quote sources, and support your assertions I'll hear you out. But if you start with "teh ultimate con" bullshit expect a rather brutal response. And if the last few pages are an admitted education, well why don't you double check your facts before bringing them to the thread.
 
Back
Top Bottom