Alex jones podcast
- Thread starter lobster
- Start date
No I don't think that would be a good idea.I was banned from the Prisonplanet forum without warning.
I was arguing that the so called 'evidence' for an inside job does not stand up to scrutiny. I kept my comments to one thread only, and was careful to be polite and take a proper approach to presenting my opinions and answering any questions.
However according to them, this proved that I was a troll and a 'paid disinfo agent'.
I was told frequently to go and watch the film Loose Change (which I had anyway). I had argued throughout that there was a possible case for gross negligence (although I have since changed my mind, there being nothing of substance to point to this), but that the 'evidence' they site, and the beliefs they hold can be shown quite easily to be erroneous if they would only consider evidence contrary to their beliefs. I went to the Loose Change website and it says there:
‘The central premise of Loose Change is that the United States Government was, at the very least, criminally negligent in allowing the attacks of September 11th, 2001 to occur.
However, when one looks deeper into the evidence, one might come to the startling conclusion that our own government might have been directly responsible for the attacks themselves.’
This is nearly exactly what I said on my thread before I was banned.
I was arguing that the former was the case, and the latter was not the case by examining the evidence.
I was frequently told to just ‘go and watch Loose Change’. The 911 ‘truth’ movement really don’t know their arses from their elbows.
The irony is that they see their mission as bringing out the 'truth'. They believe the media has supressed this 'truth' but they will happily silence anybody that argues differently.
I was arguing that the so called 'evidence' for an inside job does not stand up to scrutiny. I kept my comments to one thread only, and was careful to be polite and take a proper approach to presenting my opinions and answering any questions.
However according to them, this proved that I was a troll and a 'paid disinfo agent'.
I was told frequently to go and watch the film Loose Change (which I had anyway). I had argued throughout that there was a possible case for gross negligence (although I have since changed my mind, there being nothing of substance to point to this), but that the 'evidence' they site, and the beliefs they hold can be shown quite easily to be erroneous if they would only consider evidence contrary to their beliefs. I went to the Loose Change website and it says there:
‘The central premise of Loose Change is that the United States Government was, at the very least, criminally negligent in allowing the attacks of September 11th, 2001 to occur.
However, when one looks deeper into the evidence, one might come to the startling conclusion that our own government might have been directly responsible for the attacks themselves.’
This is nearly exactly what I said on my thread before I was banned.
I was arguing that the former was the case, and the latter was not the case by examining the evidence.
I was frequently told to just ‘go and watch Loose Change’. The 911 ‘truth’ movement really don’t know their arses from their elbows.
The irony is that they see their mission as bringing out the 'truth'. They believe the media has supressed this 'truth' but they will happily silence anybody that argues differently.
I can't say it was entirely unexpected.
Some of them really are stupid. Naueseatingly stupid, which is not a reaction I've felt before.
I think its a combination of self- righteousness, dogmatic thinking, hypocrisy and a rather worrying tendancy to react with fury to dissent.
They nearly all accused me of being a 'paid disinfo agent', one guy even kept linking to a list of 'disinfo agent' charecteristics, and siting different ones that proved I was, such as, being polite, not getting angry, admitting when you have made mistakes etc. This was apparently to garner sympathy and to diguise my secret identity.
Some of them really are stupid. Naueseatingly stupid, which is not a reaction I've felt before.
I think its a combination of self- righteousness, dogmatic thinking, hypocrisy and a rather worrying tendancy to react with fury to dissent.
They nearly all accused me of being a 'paid disinfo agent', one guy even kept linking to a list of 'disinfo agent' charecteristics, and siting different ones that proved I was, such as, being polite, not getting angry, admitting when you have made mistakes etc. This was apparently to garner sympathy and to diguise my secret identity.
editor
hiraethified
That's about the gist of it.EddyBlack said:
There was that clown whining about 'urban75 censorship' on his blog recently (he was in fact banned for endlessly promoting his site), yet when I tried to correct him on his blog and give the real reasons why he was banned... he censored all my comments!
Naturally, he was happy to immediately post up any comments congratulating him on his stand against censorship.
Twat.
Similar threads
