ice-is-forming
let me rephrase that... Fuck off
This is a tragic event. Three American fire fighters died in a plane crash, whilst flying a water bomber
I see another Pegasus jet has skidded off a runway and with deadly results this time. They do have a certain MO for their crashes.
Once - Well, jets do skid off runways time to time
Twice - Could be a coincidence
Three times - That's a pattern
I will not be flying this airline.
There is a discussion currently going on in an aviation forum about the tendency of 737s to overrun runaways in inclement weather, and to break apart during relatively minor runway excursion incidents, compared with A320s in similar situations anyway. Something I didn't know (if the claims made by several members of that aviation forum are correct) is that the A320 is certified to withstand forces of 16g in case of an impact, whereas the 737 is only good for 5g. Not sure if they're talking about the fuselage or the seats, but it is massive difference either way.Boeing 737 too...
There is a discussion currently going on in an aviation forum about the tendency of 737s to overrun runaways in inclement weather, and to break apart during relatively minor runway excursion incidents, compared with A320s in similar situations anyway. Something I didn't know (if the claims made by several members of that aviation forum are correct) is that the A320 is certified to withstand forces of 16g in case of an impact, whereas the 737 is only good for 5g. Not sure if they're talking about the fuselage or the seats, but it is massive difference either way.
The more I think about it, the more it seems to me that if the FAA hadn't been the gimp in Boeing's basement for all these decades, the 737 would have lost its airworthiness directive a long time ago. It's a bit like keep granting MOT certificates to a 1970s Ford Cortina with no seatbeatls at the back and pisspoor brakes.
Depends on the timescale. Besides, transient 16g load on an airframe (or even seat attach points) doesn't necessarily translate to the same for someone strapped into a seat riding inside. Figures around 15g sound like testing specs concerning floor acceleration and thus seat attach points/rails - see eg CFR 25.562. For example - 16g here:No idea about the G thing, but 16G would surely be fatal anyway?
Can’t stop watching this. Must have been pretty hair raising being a passenger today. At least one plane did 2 go rounds
the touch and go is at 5hrs 5mins.
Watching this on the cab to JFK, about to fly to Heathrow
air india.. not recommended. they just changed my flight thats tomorrow to something mental with a 26 hour wait in mumbai airport to connect. how can that even be allowed?
I would have thought that computers by can by their very nature calculate and analyse complex data much faster than human beings, which would make them better at landing in challenging conditions that require multiple and fast changes to the control surfaces and throttle settings of a plane. The pilot could still override the autopilot if a situation becomes extreme or the computer fails to react approprietly to any given aspect of the approach.I suspect auto pilot can land a plane more safely than a pilot in perfect conditions but would cope badly with extreme conditions. Would a computer correct a manoeuvre quickly enough in adverse conditions. Are they programmed to abort landings IN unfavourable conditions?
I suspect auto pilot can land a plane more safely than a pilot in perfect conditions but would cope badly with extreme conditions. Would a computer correct a manoeuvre quickly enough in adverse conditions. Are they programmed to abort landings IN unfavourable conditions?
They rebooked me on something decent with few hrs stop in Delhi instead, but it took 1 hour 40 mins of a really painful phonecall yesterday evening.Because they are Air India. You can of course leave the airport and spend a day in the complete shithole that is Mumbai...
They rebooked me on something decent with few hrs stop in Delhi instead, but it took 1 hour 40 mins of a really painful phonecall yesterday evening.
Why is the on hold music the same for everything , like uk power company and air india hq same stupid music??
I think it’s just the shear (ha) number of variables once you get strong crosswinds. Auto land can land a plane in the dark or fog as long as the wind is kind of in the right direction (even if not) and not to chaotic. Storm force winds like this are going to have all kinds of different gusts from multiple directions caused by the air moving over the ground. Crosswind landings are a bit of an art rather than a science In any case- I haven’t got much beyond the crayon stage...I would have thought that computers by can by their very nature calculate and analyse complex data much faster than human beings, which would make them better at landing in challenging conditions that require multiple and fast changes to the control surfaces and throttle settings of a plane. The pilot could still override the autopilot if a situation becomes extreme or the computer fails to react approprietly to any given aspect of the approach.
I hear that Croydon Airport is 100 years old today. I believe the museum is open on Sunday if anyone is interested.
No idea about the G thing, but 16G would surely be fatal anyway?
First, on December 10, 1954, John Paul Stapp, facing forward, was accelerated to a speed of 632 mph, breaking the land speed record and making him "the fastest man on earth." The sled was then slowed by water, and Stapp took 46.2 g for 1.1 seconds.
In the second event, on May 16, 1958, Eli Beeding, facing backward, was accelerated to 35 mph, then stopped in less than 1/10 second (over a distance of 1 foot). Sensors showed Beeding took a momentary peak of 82.6 g while sustaining an average of 40.4 gs for 0.04 seconds.