Russia is saying stuff like this
"Russia's embassy in Kabul said on Monday that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani had fled the country with four cars and a helicopter full of cash and had to leave some money behind as it would not all fit in, the RIA news agency reported.'
leave behind as in leave on the tarmac, is what they are suggesting.
Unlike Western countries, which scrambled to get their diplomats out of the country as the Taliban completed its military takeover of the country this weekend, Russia has said its embassy in Kabul will stay open.
Ambassador Dmitry Zhirnov told Russian state media that the Taliban had already started to guard his embassy.
Foreign ministry official Zamir Kabulov said on Monday that Russia would decide on recognising the new Taliban government based “on the conduct of the new authorities”.
Ministry of foreign affairs, Moscow.
A cool five million was abandoned on the tarmac, if reports I've read are correct.Russia is saying stuff like this.
"Russia's embassy in Kabul said on Monday that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani had fled the country with four cars and a helicopter full of cash and had to leave some money behind as it would not all fit in, the RIA news agency reported.'
leave behind as in leave on the tarmac, is what they are suggesting.
I”d be interested in this please. I won’t be able to read it until I’m home on a laptop though ( am on holiday)Can't say I'm a fan of this phrase. I don't think it leaves enough space for actual thinking about the history of Afghanistan and the experience of people living there. This paper has a good abstract, I could also send the pdf to anyone interested https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19436149.2019.1633745
Whereas the UK and us flee like thieves in the nightI think more importantly, Russia is saying stuff like this:
As the United States found on sept 11 now and again non-homegrown terrorists turn upCould someone who knows explain the risk to the UK of terrorist groups basing themselves in Afghanistan? Our politicians keep going on about it. But nearly all the terrorists who attack in the Uk are home grown.
Biden, early last month :
View attachment 283923
I'm curious, do people who know about this stuff reckon he was lying when he said (that he thought it not inevitable) or just mistaken?
Do you disagree with what she says about asylum seekers and refugees?
I'm not sure what you mean here? Surely the points she makes are correct - all we can do now is to try and secure escape routes for refugees and provide asylum. And also to discharge our debt to those who worked for us.
No. I disagree with the first part demanding Biden is let off the hook
It looks like Kabul airport is closed. It's now 22.20 in Kabul, it got dark 4 hours ago, and its reported that the Taliban have taken control of the civilian side of the airport while the US attempt to control the military side.
A German plane has had to divert to Uzbekistan because it couldn't land, and a Turkish plane has gone to Pakistan for the same reason.
I think tomorrow is going to be a shit-show. Burnt out aircraft, hostages, fighting, and everything that can go wrong, will.
I'm in utter dispair.
That isn't true though is it. This bit of the result, that is happening right now, at the airport, and with all the people who had already been promised they would be able to leave and won't now be able to, and who will quite likely die as a result, this botched departure was not inevitable just a massive fuckup.It seems that however the coalition pulled out the result would be the same
On the China-Pakistan relationship, the common term on the Chinese web is 巴铁 "Iron Pakistan" as in a cast-iron ally and the most recent thing has been a tonne of money chucked at the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, so the interests of the elites coincide (India as well as money of course) but of course it's not really so straightforward. There was an attack on a bus carrying Chinese citizens in Pakistan a month or so ago that killed about a dozen and that illustrates that it's not really a warm friendship on the ground.
I'd noticed the talks with the Taliban before this all blew up but didn't really follow up. Will have a poke around and see if ay of the better commentators have any insight.
Yeah, that's what I meant with their interests coinciding over India - both agin it.Pakistan has been firm friends with China as Pakistan is not India. PIA flew to Beijing years ago, Air India did not.
That isn't true though is it. This bit of the result, that is happening right now, at the airport, and with all the people who had already been promised they would be able to leave and won't now be able to, and who will quite likely die as a result, this was not inevitable.
Yes, they just got the timing catastrophically wrong. Thought they had time for an orderly withdrawal and they totally fucked it. Look at Biden's speech 5 weeks ago for instance, saying how they are calmly going about stamping the visas of their allies and interpreters and shall be ferrying them all to safety if they so choose by the 31st of August.How come? Could the US advertise that it will pull out on such and such a date and anyone who wants to flee now will be protected? That perhaps may have been better but the Taliban were always going to take control again once the US fucked off. They are not some alien force that appeared there, they are Afghans.
It's not a 'gotcha' because politically he can always argue it wasn't inevitable, just the way things panned out. There's a reason he's put it with the numbers like that. "As any fule can see...(300,000 is bigger than 75000)"Biden, early last month :
View attachment 283923
I'm curious, do people who know about this stuff reckon he was lying when he said (that he thought it not inevitable) or just mistaken?
Wholly non-judgmental question if I may? It seems that however the coalition pulled out the result would be the same; how does it feel if you have lost a loved one or some limbs there seeing how it has inevitably returned to Taliban rule?
You never heard of the covenant of security successive British governments entered into with jihadis thenJames Heappey, a junior defence minister and ex-serviceman, is on C4 news. He's retelling the lie that he helped prevent Al-Q from using Afghanistan as a base for international terror. This is such horseshit and it's the official justification for the deaths of his colleagues. We invade, so we get to the top of the target list for the terrorist imams, who can live in dozens of countries. Then the imams use the internet to recruit and radicalise British people and give them bomb-making tuition. The invasion causes the attacks here, it doesn't prevent them. We'd be safer if our forces bombed the fucking internet.
I assume the people at the airport are Afghan soldiers being abandoned by their paymasters rather than civilians.