Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
Oh fuck off you useless wankerAre you saying that it's so prevalent that 7 women are likely to?
Oh fuck off you useless wankerAre you saying that it's so prevalent that 7 women are likely to?
Irrelevant to the argument. Hope you're never selected for jury service. It's people like you that lead to miscarriages of justice.
It wasn't that the fiscal did a shit job the first time round, the judge took a decision that some questioned whether he really had the authority to make. Yes, sinclair was already in prison but it didn't mean he shouldn't be prosecuted for committing two horrific crimes.I know. That to me is wrong. That did such a shit job in 2007, that they couldn't even get a not proven they really shouldn't have been allowed another go. And to under mine the principle on a bloke whose banged up for life any way. Not a good look for Scottish Justice. Nice pub though.
No I am asking you to answer a question that is impossible for you to answer meaningfully without generalising just like the one you asked trashpony to answer. It's pointless to throw at her the fact that some of the jurors are women. You don't win anything nor does it strengthen the decision.
OK.
But if it's impossible for me to answer without generalising, then touché of course, because your bias is also apparent.
Naturally, people are swayed by their circumstances and prejudices. No prizes for pointing that out.
Is it? Want to spell that out for me? Then I will answer your questions below. Just so we know where we are starting from and exactly what you are assuming of me/projecting.
Oh and while you are at it perhaps you can outline what 'circumstances and prejudices' you are being swayed by?
You didn't answer my questions below like you promised :-(
Nothing in the link contradicts what I said. Both witnesses suddenly remembered that she had used the same phrase after Evans' conviction and after the £50k offer was made on his website. If you look on the Wales Online website you can read a fairly thorough account of the retrial.You should read bimble's helpful link instead of talking rot
So you believe two witnesses committed perjury.Nothing in the link contradicts what I said. Both witnesses suddenly remembered that she had used the same phrase after Evans' conviction and after the £50k offer was made on his website. If you look on the Wales Online website you can read a fairly thorough account of the retrial.
The whole thing is dodgy as fuck.
Yes. Why not? It's their word against hers and we all know she's a fucking lying slagSo you believe two witnesses committed perjury.
What's she lied about?Yes. Why not? It's their word against hers and we all know she's a fucking lying slag
I said I would once you clarify...
1. your assertion of me, namely that my 'bias is also apparent'
2. your position in terms of the 'circumstances and prejudices' you are being swayed by.
So you believe two witnesses committed perjury.
So you believe two witnesses committed perjury.
It can now be reported that, following the jury's verdict in the first trial, Miss Massey contacted the witness in an act described as 'akin to bribery' by the prosecution.
She sent two messages to Mr Burrough, the first at 12.12pm on May 6 2013.
Prosecuting, Simon Medland QC told Cardiff Crown Court: 'The first of these messages draws to Mr Burrough's attention her claim that this defendant was then wrongly locked up in prison for a crime that never happened.'
'We are appealing for new information and there's a £50,000 reward for any new evidence.
'Do you know anything that could help Ched? X'
Mr Burrough did not respond to the message, with Miss Massey sending another at 9am the following day.
Mr Medland said the contentious message read: ''Ok, I see you have chosen to ignore me.
'I understand you want to put it all behind you but if you can deal with the fact that you know Ched is innocent and he is spending the next 17 months in prison and you can just sit back and let that happen then so be it.
'I'm literally begging. If you know anything please help me. X''
I suppose she saved a few quid for the jury tooThe two witnesses have anonymity. The hotel receptionist was offered that, but decided to reject it in order to offer this hard evidence:
Ched Evans' fiancee Natasha Massey offered £50k reward for evidence on Facebook | Daily Mail Online
The two witnesses have anonymity. The hotel receptionist was offered that, but decided to reject it in order to offer this hard evidence:
Ched Evans' fiancee Natasha Massey offered £50k reward for evidence on Facebook | Daily Mail Online
So 50K might inspire some new witnesses, but how doesn't it convince the jury of his guilt?
It was intended to secure evidence to prove his innocenceSo 50K might inspire some new witnesses, but how doesn't it convince the jury of his guilt?
I suppose she saved a few quid for the jury too
who did you use to be?Rather like those with whom the Urbanati disagree
It was intended to secure evidence to prove his innocence
I bet you get your own way a lot
Not this time though.
Yeh? So why didn't you say that?I meant "how does giving someone 50K make a jury think you're innocent"?
Oh, I see: the judge was in it tooThe jury were not allowed to be told of her attempted bribery of the receptionist. They were weakly informed of the offer of the 'reward' in the questioning of the two killer witnesses.
Yes I am, but "clearly and honestly" doesn't necessarily mean "blah blah accuse you of your fault"Ah so not willing to engage with me clearly and honestly? ...and somehow that is my fault? All righty then.
Because I don't owe you a fucking explanation for everything I say.Yeh? So why didn't you say that?
It's not easy to make me sorry for the Queen but you've managed it by using her as your avatar. What did she ever do to deserve it?Yes I am, but "clearly and honestly" doesn't necessarily mean "blah blah accuse you of your fault"
No, it's because you're full of shitBecause I don't owe you a fucking explanation for everything I say.
Oh, I see: the judge was in it too
Yes. But you said the jury was only told weakly about the money. And who does the allowing in a crown court?Judges can't ask for a witness to be called, that is for the prosecution or defence to do.