Winot
I wholeheartedley agree with your viewpoint
You made a career out of it? Impressive.
It doesn’t pay much but the hours are good.
You made a career out of it? Impressive.
Interesting idea qtπWe have +-×÷=, as well as many other mathematical symbols and the like. But really +-×÷= are the bones of all maths. What if there was something else that we hadn't discovered yet? Is this a possibility? I favour the idea of a quantum symbol. I'll call it Q, it means yes and no at the same time. Equals but does not equal, positive and negative. I'm pretty sure it will be in the new equation that solves where all the dark matter and energy is. Anyone wanna run the numbers?
I favour the idea of a quantum symbol. I'll call it Q, it means yes and no at the same time.
sexist much?Interesting idea qtπ
How's that then?sexist much?
Do I need to spell it out?How's that then?
Yes, please do.Do I need to spell it out?
You just copy-pasted something I posted. I asked you to explain how it was sexist, given the context.
Perhaps you can explain what you meant by it, if not its usual meaning.You just copy-pasted something I posted. I asked you to explain how it was sexist, given the context.
It was a wordplay on a mathematical symbol that the poster hadn't included in his original post.Perhaps you can explain what you meant by it, if not its usual meaning.
E2A I will gladly stand corrected.Perhaps you can explain what you meant by it, if not its usual meaning.
Corrected?E2A I will gladly stand corrected.
OK. It was the wordplay I was saying was sexist. Is it not sexist?It was a wordplay on a mathematical symbol that the poster hadn't included in his original post.
Now either stop dancing around and explain yourself or shut up, really.
I already asked you to explain how, but I'm already a bit weary of this conversation.OK. It was the wordplay I was saying was sexist. Is it not sexist?
Yes, please do.
Whatever qt3.1415927I mean, wtf? In what world is qt pi not sexsist?
Maybe if it was aimed at a woman, in a condescending way, you'd have the point you're desperately struggling for.OK. It was the wordplay I was saying was sexist. Is it not sexist?
Is that as far as you're prepared to go in your defence?Whatever qt3.1415927
Euler's identity is my favourite equation:
View attachment 194474
It's got all the important stuff.
Euler's identity - Wikipedia
Fair enough. I had no idea of the gender of the poster you were addressing. But it's OK if you're being dismissive of females when you're addressing a male, so you're good.Maybe if it was aimed at a woman, in a condescending way, you'd have the point you're desperately struggling for.
In a reply to a poster who has always identified as a male as far as I've known him here, on a maths thread and in agreement with him, I think I'm safe.
Fuck off.
So you assumed their gender?Fair enough. I had no idea of the gender of the poster you were addressing. But it's OK if you're being dismissive of females when you're addressing a male, so you're good.
I haven't a clue.Indeed - bluescreen mentioned qubits - they're apparently yes and no at the same time. Whatever the fuck that means.
I mean, wtf? In what world is qt pi not sexsist?
I mean, wtf? In what world is qt pi not sexsist?
Or are a white man.It's really not a big deal. If you have time to worry about this you have a good life.