TotallyGreatGuy
Tool
"a bully, plain and simple" used to be your little bio under your name. But you knew that already.an opinion, not a fact.
"a bully, plain and simple" used to be your little bio under your name. But you knew that already.an opinion, not a fact.
yes, it did. but fyi it's not a little bio. you have 'member' under your name, though it would be more appropriate if it was 'tool'."a bully, plain and simple" used to be your little bio under your name. But you knew that already.
It's a "custom title". I feel so knowledgeable.but fyi it's not a little bio
So, what's the police response to all this?
This morning they have been stopping cyclists to give them "advice", like telling them to wear a helmet and high-viz, neither of which are required for cyclists to be lawful on the road. Why do anything meaningful, when you can simply set up a PR exercise and blame the victims?
So, what's the police response to all this?
This morning they have been stopping cyclists to give them "advice", like telling them to wear a helmet and high-viz, neither of which are required for cyclists to be lawful on the road. Why do anything meaningful, when you can simply set up a PR exercise and blame the victims?
http://road.cc/content/news/99098-l...sts-without-helmets-advice-education-exercise
Interesting to note that, according to LBC, another police operation stopped 20 HGVs and they found a total of 60 separate offences, like drivers working for too long and vehicles in dangerous conditions.
Did I miss something, since when was it permissible for the police to detain cyclist for not wearing helmets and hi-viz jackets?
HGVs actually make up around 4% of the traffic in London but are involved in 53% of cycling fatalities. (Source.)To avoid being called some kind of apologist for the poor behaviour of cyclists I feel that I first need to say that - yes a cyclist may well be at fault if they give killed by an HVG - but you raise an issue that really needs to be looked at.
Of the recent deaths the vast majority have been people killed by HGV's - while HGV's make up around 20% of the traffic in London.
fuuuuuckFrom BBC live feed 1pm:
Cyclist death
Police say a cyclist has been killed in a crash in Camberwell, south-east London, just after noon.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24989985
....guess what?, he was hit by a HGV!
So sad.
...The Road Haulage Association accept that visibility is a real problem with HGV drivers - their preferred route is to do outreach sessions where they let people sit in HGV's to show just how much of a problem visibility is. At the same time they lobby against any 'red tape' which could improve visibility for the vehicles.
Detaining: keep (someone) from proceeding by holding them back or making claims on their attention.Not detaining....more like advising apparently.
Detaining: keep (someone) from proceeding by holding them back or making claims on their attention.
The mayor could do that overnight, except there's existing restrictions in place on night time deliveries.Would it be feasible for all HGV's to be given a London delivery window of say from 11pm to 6am?, is that possible/enforceable? Just asking?......
I'm not a cyclist so not in a postion to argue, but I thought the jury was still out on the effectiveness of helmets.If 2 minutes worth of advice saves a life then i'm all for it.
Would it be feasible for all HGV's to be given a London delivery window of say from 11pm to 6am?, is that possible/enforceable?
I'm not a cyclist so not in a postion to argue, but I thought the jury was still out on the effectiveness of helmets.
I'm not a cyclist so not in a postion to argue, but I thought the jury was still out on the effectiveness of helmets.
Anyway, condolences to friends & family of today's casualty.
The combination of lights, hi-viz clothing & helmets all makes cycling a lot safer.....sounds like thats what the old bill are pointing out, i'm a cyclist & the amount I see in London with none of the above beggers belief!
Very good to see an article like that in the Standard of all places.Remarkably sane and balanced article from the Standard: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/tran...-cyclist-deaths-on-londons-roads-8946603.html
I did not scroll down to the comments
I took a peek and saw the phrase "scum cyclists" in comment #2 so swiftly closed the browser window.Remarkably sane and balanced article from the Standard: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/tran...-cyclist-deaths-on-londons-roads-8946603.html
I did not scroll down to the comments
Very good to see an article like that in the Standard of all places.