I'm a lying twat and the Guardian still pay me to write articles, what are you going to do about it? Look at how smug I am, and no one hits me. Life is good.
swearing at someone will often provoke a response too. or writing bollocks in the grauniad.
Not really Guardian-specific, but I find Caitlin Moran irritating. She always appears in photos in contrived, 'kooky' poses and I have yet to read an article by her that isn't of the 'fill the page with whimsical observations of daily life' type.
Jamie Doward is now claiming that something widely reported in 2010 (including in his own paper):Here's the cached article. Jamie Doward as author.
Here's a typical claim by Madsen (not the names involved - Corsi etc)
Maybe they should all have to go on one of these? This one maybe?
[it] has emerged that attempts to introduce a form of labelling were approved by the European parliament in June 2010.
'Huhne the Perjurer' has a certain ring to itlets not just call him a liar, that suggests little white lies and falsehoods of convenience. Huhne lied under oath, before a court. Over a fucking speeding ticket.
...It can be confusing. As my hairdresser said yesterday, "How will we ever know what happened? They're so private."
Talking of Brockes (on the other thread)...
http://www.theguardian.com/commenti...once-solange-knowles-instagram-photos-scandal
it was still a strike denying anti working class rag even back in the olden days
They have 2 northern reporters now, down from 90 not too long ago.Really? Bah. I had a romantic notion that it was once good.
The series of articles telling you "How to dress/eat" are possibly the very worst of all now. How you could cook that up in a meeting room and not think it was patronising is beyond me. The way we are all supposed to eat and drink is the way better-off people in a 5 mile radius of N1 do by the way.
No wait, my least favourite thing is the Guardian's attitude to the North. The articles that read as if the journo has just arrived in territory as unfamiliar as the Amazon with "Bye 'eck!" and "Grim up North" comedy headlines. Articles about the East End never have "slaaaaaaaaaag" or "right knees up" in the headline though, becaue it would be crass to take the piss out of wonderful London of course. London is one of just two important cities in the world of course, the other being New York. Knowing this makes for a marvellously broad appreciation of world media, culture and events.
Surprised he'd want to given their role in publicising his outing as an amazon review trasher of his enemies.
I'm a lying twat and the Guardian still pays me to write articles, what are you going to do about it? Look at how smug I am, and no one hits me. Life is good.
Really? Bah. I had a romantic notion that it was once good.
The series of articles telling you "How to dress/eat" are possibly the very worst of all now. How you could cook that up in a meeting room and not think it was patronising is beyond me. The way we are all supposed to eat and drink is the way better-off people in a 5 mile radius of N1 do by the way.
No wait, my least favourite thing is the Guardian's attitude to the North. The articles that read as if the journo has just arrived in territory as unfamiliar as the Amazon with "Bye 'eck!" and "Grim up North" comedy headlines. Articles about the East End never have "slaaaaaaaaaag" or "right knees up" in the headline though, becaue it would be crass to take the piss out of wonderful London of course. London is one of just two important cities in the world, the other being New York. Knowing this makes for a marvellously broad appreciation of world media, culture and events.
it's not about satisfying me, it's whether you want a thread which shows that the guardian is a shit newspaper (which isn't really news) or whether you want a thread that says WHY it is a shit newspaper, which if this one is, it is so only tangentially. or you could simply post up your usual cack-handed bollocks which impresses no one but you.Great feedback. Please everyone, let's make sure we're satisfying Pickman's Model. Let's get our priorities right here.
it's not about satisfying me, it's whether you want a thread which shows that the guardian is a shit newspaper (which isn't really news) or whether you want a thread that says WHY it is a shit newspaper, which if this one is, it is so only tangentially. or you could simply post up your usual cack-handed bollocks which impresses no one but you.
you mean "as long as that poster's not Pickman's"It's absolutely fine to have a thread that criticises the Guardian in any which way U75 posters feel. That's what it now is.
I don't usually post on this thread, being resigned to the quiet subservience of the guardian class in the face of power. But this, this is an infomercial. Or a docuvertisement. Or some shite like that. It is about Renegade Professionals. And you need to read it. Because otherwise how will you respect these renegades who have risen among us? Or at least, how will you believe this horror was actually created by someone?
http://surface.theguardian.com/
Spoiler: it reads like a masterpiece from The Onion.
the guardian's loyal oppositionThe Guardian. It's driving me mad but it's still the one I go to.
No. You must read it all.Ew. I spotted 'Vibrant' and 'Street Food' within about 30 seconds and backed slowly away.