Raheem
Well-Known Member
He's the one who didn't. It was a bit of a Westminster talking-point.Is Farron the one who liked his chest pooed on?
He's the one who didn't. It was a bit of a Westminster talking-point.Is Farron the one who liked his chest pooed on?
You're thinking of Mark OatenIs Farron the one who liked his chest pooed on?
Mark oaten was likely the tip of the icebergYou're thinking of Mark Oaten
Was it a threesome?You're thinking of Mark Oaten
He's always ready for the aplopalypseI'm sure that if it were God's will that someone shat on his chest, Farron would be totally up for it.
You're thinking of Mark Oaten
I'll probably get stick for listening to this but the Guardian Weekly Politics podcast sometimes has some interesting content
Yes. Not the only one though.Is Farron the one who liked his chest pooed on?
I saw that and vaguely wondered if it was cheaper to stage a pic rather than pay royalties.
I was in a supermarket yesterday evening. No headlines left to read, more or less all papers gone, all titles sold out. People buying souvenirs I guess, for their grandchildren to be, because its history and they were there (well, in Morrisons) and no-one is going to save a screenshot for the inheritance.It's not until page 26 of today's edition that they start reporting any news, with such unimportant stuff as child mental health and shipping people the government doesn't like to Rwanda. Plus all four column pieces, the lead editorial and a load of bollocks about how sports are "paying their respects" (by pissing their fans off).
Oh, and a 40 page memorial supplement.
No comments allowed on the article though.Why are people getting arrested in Britain for being republicans? | Zoe Williams
Over the years, the conversation has been steadily closed down so that you can no longer voice anything but adoration, writes Zoe Williamswww.theguardian.com
They've finally allowed a timid suggestion that not everyone is crying their eyes out.
Good stuff. Are they now subjecting you to 'pre-moderation'? (ie. banning your comments) They did this to me after I posted something comparing Keir Starmer to Neil Kinnock!There are no comments being allowed on any of the articles about the queen or monarchy. So I posted this on another of their articles where comments were allowed and took a screenshot - and it was gone within 10 seconds! Suggests that they have pre set programs wiping any comments the mention the subject. Just - for fucks sake...
View attachment 342331
They've remedied this with today's lead editorial, with predictable results.There are no comments being allowed on any of the articles about the queen or monarchy.