Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

@guardian guest account - actually, can I please be credited in future when I spot the bias in your articles and you rush to correct them? Saves me the bother of thinking I am going insane.
 
Good to know we have an effect.

I was rather annoyed that my 900 or so articles read in the past year got reset.
A woeful underestimate.
Am now even more determined not to register.

I see that pop-up as a little victory every few days when I check in on the site. Haven't got it up to five figures in a year yet but imagine the sense of achievement ...
 
My concern is that he's now aware of the status of his columns and when memes become self-aware things don't tend to work. We shall see.
 
Full of stories such as how to have a soy-based Halloween, or a supposedly amusing account of buying a wood burner by an incredibly middle-class freelancer.
 
There's a postage stamp-sized picture of it there, it doesn't look like it's in a front room. Too small.
I was reading on a phone. Sat on my normal toilet. Skim read it, in Adrian Chiles voice - imagining him chortling about it at a dinner party he's thrown. To celebrate something boring football happening.
 

About The The being on the telly tonight.

"Expect exquisite adolescent angst tempered by the wisdom of middle age." - Phil Harrison

Has Phil not seen the state of the the the twitter machine? Expect a babbling conspiraloon cunt more like.
 

About The The being on the telly tonight.



Has Phil not seen the state of the the the twitter machine? Expect a babbling conspiraloon cunt more like.
That quote about exquisite adolescent angst a contender for pseuds corner
 
everything in that is correct, other than the fact that Putin is not interested in peace talks - his ambitions appear to be greater than anything that could be on offer

If you think everything is correct but that one thing, then the entire article is surely flawed because it argues that the only way forward is "persuading Putin to implement an immediate ceasefire, by inviting Russia to comprehensive peace talks". 🤷
 
If you think everything is correct but that one thing, then the entire article is surely flawed because it argues that the only way forward is "persuading Putin to implement an immediate ceasefire, by inviting Russia to comprehensive peace talks". 🤷
i agree with you
all the analysis is correct...but theres no solution that arises from that analysis...the conclusion drawn is a nonstarter....if only there were
 
Back
Top Bottom