Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

And he's the go to man for the liberals for light academic fluff on populism. Since trump his stuff has got
steadily worse. He used to do some decent stuff.
Some of his analysis pieces are still semi-reasonable, for example this one on the Russia-Trump crap.
In other words, the Russia-Trump collusion story might be the talk of the town in Washington, but this is not the case in much of the rest of the country. Just four in 10 Americans believe the Russia investigation is “extremely” or “very” important to them, while issues like immigration, taxes and health care are all considered much more important, also by most Democrats. These are the issues that will bring them out to vote, not the Russia investigation.
But his actual politics are terrible.
 
2016: The EU is great and brought us workers' rights
2017: Macron is way cool and will save us from Fascism.
2018: Crush the Unions:

The Guardian view on France’s transport strikes: make or break for Macron | Editorial
proper shit that, saw it yesterday. Especially the 'OK well yes our privatised rail is fucking awful but nationalisation is also bad'. And the shit at the start 'only 11%' thats right, evil minority union with their generous money. These liberal twats must want a le pen
 
Mad, wishful thinking nonsense
The project appears to be the most significant attempt to challenge the main parties yet to emerge. However, Britain’s electoral system and the reluctance of existing politicians to make the jump makes it extremely difficult to make a success of a new party.

The formation of a new party could represent a challenge to both the Lib Dems, who remain in the doldrums, and Labour, which is divided over Corbyn’s leadership and has been plagued by accusations of antisemitism by some members.
Even if this "party" intend to challenge it's dead in the water before it begins. Ludicrous nonsense.
 
well, certainly The Guardian did. This is their wet dream, all they need is David Milliband to come back to helm (or Chuka/Dan Jarvis) and the Suzanne Moore/Polly Toynbee articles will roll right in
 
well, certainly The Guardian did. This is their wet dream, all they need is David Milliband to come back to helm (or Chuka/Dan Jarvis) and the Suzanne Moore/Polly Toynbee articles will roll right in

I've always thought that personal charm is the biggest attribute of a political leader; everything else can be sort by the political machine.

Blair has tremendous charm, even when you see him speak today he's still more watchable than most of the generic talking heads. Cameron was a very pleasant chap in the media. I'm not sure what happened with William Hague who turned out the be very charming and funny once he wasn't a leader. Whatever you think of these people they are/were able to connect with enough people to be electorally successful.

May has no media charm, by Jeeza does - I suspect that's why he's done so well.

David Milliband is no doubt smart and probably an effective leader - but he's just another charmless cookie-cutter politician.
 
What the fuck? It's basically a rich wanker showing off. Yuk.
I try not to hate on people just for being successful or rich but it's very difficult to read that without loathing him, He probably isn't bothered about living alone since he's obviously in love with himself.
 
The Oxfam shop in Stratford-on-Avon is selling Royal Wedding tat if any urbans are interested in it, they have teapots, cups and plates with pictures of the happy couple on them, Didn't buy any cos we have a dishwasher and I suspect it wouldn't survive many washes.
 
Back
Top Bottom