Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the Guardian is going down the pan!

Awesome wells spotted in the comments - falling for some racist shit stirring about no whites signs in somali cafes and moaning about the buses.
Remarkable to me how so many people manage to describe a Stapleton Road completely at variance with the one I walk up and down twice a day

Anyway - Easton, St Pauls, St Werburghs, Stokes Croft... what a vast swathe of Bristol our hero covers in his article. He expresses concern at the divisions in the city but seems unable to even mention Southmead, Lockleaze or Hartcliffe by name. Nice one Guardian for getting a new arrival to describe his city though - not sure they'd like mine so much
 
Deflated Clegg back to full size as he hurtles towards margins of significance
Deputy prime minister has passed through his darkest hours to a state of gallows humour as coalition comes to an end

Clegg is a changed man. Late last year, he appeared to be shrinking daily and it seemed he would soon need help to climb on to the front benches. Now he has returned to almost full-size.

Just as he hurtles ever faster towards the margins of significance, he gives the impression of being, for the first time in years, a politician of something approaching gravitas. His tragedy is that no one is now listening to him. Not even in the Commons. He is teased and bullied by MPs on all sides.

oh my aching sides
 
Putting the term in inverted commas, while highlighting the systematic problems underlying the phenomenon - as outlined in the article - and relating it to marketization of social care.

Actually seems like one of the Guardian's better bits of output.
Yeah, it's using NHS slang for them, I don't see it as something to complain at the Guardian about

I suspect some of you would be shocked at the way we talk about our jobs and the patients in my work :oops:
 
The Guardian's rolling Paris shootings coverage features a minute's video of commemorative silence at the morning editorial conference, Rusbridger even gazing away from his iphone at one point. Later, it reported excitedly that security arrangements at Kings Place would possibly be reviewed.

Yes, keeping a rolling blog fresh is difficult, especially when there's little new information and much of it is unreliable (the blog reported last night that the suspects had been nicked). But you're a news organisation. You're not news. You're not intrinsically interesting. Learn the difference.
 
The Guardian's rolling Paris shootings coverage this morning included a minute's video of a one minute silence at the morning editorial conference, Rusbridger even gazing away from his iphone at one point. Later, it reported excitedly that security arrangements at Kings Place would possibly be reviewed.

Yes, keeping a rolling blog fresh is difficult, especially when there's little new information and much of it is unreliable (the blog reported last night that the suspects had been nicked). But you're a news organisation. You're not news. You're not intrinsically interesting. Learn the difference.
Journalists like feeling important bless 'em
 
Journalists like feeling important bless 'em

Other news organisations don't do this. They don't sell tickets to let readers wander around their offices, or set up absurd coffee bars, or take internal spats public on the public news site. They corral and channel journalistic self-importance. At the Graun, it is unrestricted.
 
as if the guardian has ever failed to bend it's knee to power of any sort! if they get shot up by offended terrorists it'll be some of us, not al-quaeda!
the difference between charlie hebdo and the guardian is that a charlie hebdo cartoonist had to be threatened and forced to enter the access code, a guardian journalist would volunteer the information.
 
Back
Top Bottom