Luvvy as fuck.Yes, and? I've never thought of TS as one of the great luvvies of our time (she was alright as the corporate lawyer villainess in that George Clooney movie, I suppose), so I'm not bothered either way.
I know i've seen that but can't remember anything at all about it.And I didn't recognize Ewen Bremner at all.
Also, it was much better than Elysium, surely you can agree with that?
I know i've seen that but can't remember anything at all about it.
Intersteller
Didn't really like it until Matt Damon's character turned up then it seemed to just switch up a gear and get started. So much of it didn't ring true - not just the science but the relationships between the characters. In the end it was all about love. Hmmm. It's entertaining enough especially in the last hour but it's not the most amazing sci-fi ever or whatever it's been billed as.
Bad dvd etiquette.literally three night in a row now I have fallen asleep before the coming of Damon. I didn't even know he is in it.
It's pretty ponderous before then and what's the point of the robots? Just utterly crap and useless.literally three night in a row now I have fallen asleep before the coming of Damon. I didn't even know he is in it.
Do your research mate. I try to IMDb before a film these days, so as to avoid stopping the film every five minutes.literally three night in a row now I have fallen asleep before the coming of Damon. I didn't even know he is in it.
Mconoughays southern drawl has a soporific effect on me. It's like he's talking you into a fugue state
which kinda ruins the surprise when you're not meant to know someones in it.Do your research mate. I try to IMDb before a film these days, so as to avoid stopping the film every five minutes.
My need to know trumps my need to be surprised. I always used to read the synopsis is S&S too. had to stop buying it.which kinda ruins the surprise when you're not meant to know someones in it.
It's (S&S) not as bad as it used to be, the complete reviews are more avoidable now. I try and show some patience, remember to google when I get home/once its overMy need to know trumps my need to be surprised. I always used to read the synopsis is S&S too. had to stop buying it.
I yearn for such self-control. I just started S3 of Parks & Recreation but had to do a bit of skimming just to find out if two characters were going to get it together or not.It's (S&S) not as bad as it used to be, the complete reviews are more avoidable now. I try and show some patience, remember to google when I get home/once its over
I'm not that fussed about knowing tbh.too often I tried to look up a character in Mad Men, and then discovered they die in the next episode, or somesuch. Cant let it happen again
all too often ruins a film, imo. I spent the last hour of Foxcatcher waiting for [that thing that happens] to happen. Deffo spoiled it for meI'm not that fussed about knowing tbh.
I always had to sneak a peak at my Xmas present early, so I think it's too deeply ingrained now to stop finding out stuff beforehand.
If it's a historical event like that I couldn't give a stuffall too often ruins a film, imo. I spent the last hour of Foxcatcher waiting for [that thing that happens] to happen. Deffo spoiled it for me
but people have eulogised it as not the answer but a response to kubriks 2001 so I feel I should finish it if only to be able to point out that this is nonsense hyperbole.
e2a
the square robots with attitude are funny in a good way
AI was strange, I was set up not to like it as I don't like osmond or the robojigalo but somehow it was just visually stunning enough to win me over. Not one I'll watch again though, but a decent enough slice of sci fiIt's not 2001 or Solaris. Or even the Clooney Solaris. But I'd put it in the same category as AI. Which I also enjoyed.