Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

What DVD / Video did you watch last night? (pt3)

Watched Only God Forgives, and butchers, Reno and others have said what needs saying but do you reckon the weird scream Gosling does at his love interest to take off her dress was deliberate, given the prevailing oddity of the film? I hope so as otherwise his imperturbable hardman schtick will need a re-think.
 
:
Sitting Target (1972)- Oliver Reed, Ian McShane, Jill St.John....I enjoyed it from start to finish. Grading: A Very Good Film. :)

I liked that one too - lots to commend, like the prologue sequence with Reed losing it in gaol, and then all that location stuff around Clapham Junction, and even the car chase - and I am not a fan of car chases - which for the most part seem to take part on real roads with real actors driving.
 
:
Sitting Target (1972)- Oliver Reed, Ian McShane, Jill St.John.

I'd never heard of this film, so had no specific expectations- except that Oliver Reed is usually a good sign, according to moi... He was more than decent here.

Should read the thread more closely! What i don't get is why they decided on allowing Reed to do his I'm a horrible cockney gangster accent -it simply wasn't required and totally undermined him. Ended up just reminding me of more Paul Kaye doing Maurice in the victor chandler adverts than a menacing hard-man.
 
Should read the thread more closely! What i don't get is why they decided on allowing Reed to do his I'm a horrible cockney gangster accent -it simply wasn't required and totally undermined him. Ended up just reminding me of more Paul Kaye doing Maurice in the victor chandler adverts than a menacing hard-man.
Heh... I agree it's not THE best forgotten classic of all time or anything like that- but i usually enjoy watching that type of old, obscure and slightly naff films... especially late at night when I'm in the "mood"... It holds a certain exoticism for me, I reckon- too young to have experied the seventies, I'm a bit obsessed by the period and probably see everything through a retrofetishist lens... I thought it was decent enough, actually- kind of borderline boring and slugged on in places, but like I said it was those "experimental" scenes which did it for me. (It doesn't really matter to me whether such actors/films are good or not, TBH- as long as they deliver that slightly alien period fix, I'm in seventies bliss and that grainy footage and aestetic just draws me in and I pretend to live back in time...)
 
The Kids are All Right (2010) yes OK I'm only a FEW years out of date. If you don't know already, a family comedy for the modern age revolving around the chaos that ensues when the two children of a lesbian couple seek out their sperm donor dad. Was expecting it to be blindingly brilliant because of the number of 5-star or 100% approval ratings it got from US and UK critics and because it looked like the sort of thing (indie-ish, grown-up non-CGI human dramas with believable situations and good acting) that I normally get on with. Left feeling a bit meh about it, and definitely not going along with the frenzied adoration.

Good things: Absolutely fantastic cast and acting (Mia Wasikowska is my new screen idol, Mark Ruffalo's as brilliant as ever at being rumpled and sexy, Annette Bening's brilliant at being not that likeable as a tightly-wound control freak who likes wine too much, Julianne Moore's great at being flaky and selfish and yet sympathetic.) Yes, it IS important that lowkey family comedies start reflecting 21st-century realities like lasting gay & lesbian partnerships, adoption, sperm-donor kids etc, and this film is a move in that direction. The soundtrack is pretty good and there's a brilliant bit where the sound mix gives you a deep dramatic hit as well. Some of the dialogue's great. And it does manage to be unpredictable and not-what-you-were-expecting in lots of ways.

Bad things: it's a rich white Californian's view of the world. It's smug as fuck (even when /as it satirises people who're smug as fuck) and personally I just found many of the characters unforgivably self-indulgent and shrill and unlikeable. It treats its characters of colour like disposable extras (just as its characters do). It sometimes pulls its punches a bit and doesn't go far enough, imho in the direction of either broad comedy or savage satire. Overall I was disappointed because it's a good enough way to spend an hour and a half but it's definitely not the New Age of Filmmaking it was touted as at the time of release.
 
ha! fair do's, each to their own.

The use of 'yellowface' was particularly galling. It wasn't even convincing.

Yeah I guess that was kind of necessary to keep in line with the theme of the book though.

I'd imagine it would be quite difficult to portray the same soul in different bodies if they had used different actors?
 
Group 7 - awful hackneyed rubbish about a gang of tough cops cleaning out the drug dealers from Seville for the 92 expo and the personal problems the stress of doing so brings them. Utter Rubbish.
 
Do you think he was meant to be a real character or just a figment of Zachary's imagination?


Bit of both I reckon, Sonmi was divine and real because people believed in her. Where as Old Georgie only existed in Zachary's head and few believed of him.

Still makes me think of...

 
It is shit. Awful. Terrible. One of the worst films I saw last year.

:D absolutely! I dunno why we thought it was good, we tend to DL stuff and then it sits there, and as we knew it wasn't child friendly and he's not here we thought we'd watch it.

I'm deleting it ... possibly without getting to the end!

ETA: aarrggh it's got Norah Jones in it ... how could she *weeps*
 
How the fuck as that film hard work ? :confused:
I just wrote then deleted a snarky comment because I figured 8115 must have been being sarcastic or something - it's hard to think of a Hitchcock film that goes down as easy. The sort of film that if you catch starting just before you planned to go to bed, you end up staying up to watch all the way through to the end.
 
I just wrote then deleted a snarky comment because I figured 8115 must have been being sarcastic or something - it's hard to think of a Hitchcock film that goes down as easy. The sort of film that if you catch starting just before you planned to go to bed, you end up staying up to watch all the way through to the end.


I don't recall The Killing being vastly difficult.
 
The ABCs of Death, an anthology film where 26 horror film directors made a short film for one of the letters of the alphabet. As one would expect a very mixed bag, but at least when something was shit, it didn't last long. There are a few little gems in there.
 
Just watched The Hobbit, which I was surprisingly impressed with even though it's (cough) very Lord-of-the-Ringsy. Quite funny in places and didn't seem nearly 3 hours, although the first half hour felt like 3 hours.
 
Back
Top Bottom