Jon Snow is amazeballs
Yeah, watched it earlier in the week. I thought it was good fun, liked the music, the naked machine gun fight and the useful application of a pencil in the final act!
To be fair, there were not many countries where Castellari's version was released with the title 'Inglourious Bastards' and its original Italian title translated as 'That damned armored train'
Bastardi senza gloria (literally: "Bastards Without Glory") was just a working title.....only the US got it as Inglourious Bastards, as well as 'Hell's Heroes' and 'Deadly Mission'.
The Thing (1982), which still builds up a nice suspense. Great, minimalist, systolic soundtrack.
Wrong.Submarine - Nice little film.
Jon Snow is amazeballs
I'm getting to see a lot of these with my daughter who hasn't seen them before.I watched that recently and it just didn't do it for me anymore.
Just stuck all of them on me Lovefilm list, ta.No - the last part of Pablo Larraín's Pinochet trilogy (the others being Tony Manero and Post Mortem - both great). This is the most 'normal' of the three and one (despite some choices that may seem odd at first look being made - 4:3 aspect ratio, grainy analog video) and one that looks out to wider society rather than concentrating on how pinochet's society warped individuals. Film hinges on the referendum on removing Pinochet in 1988. Almost totally successful film and a def recommend. (Tony Manero is the best of the three for me though).
Wrong.
Lego / painting by numbers UK indie.
I did like the thing, but when you have seen it loads of times and you have memories of it that have elevated far beyond it's actual status, it's not as great to watch again.You don't like The Thing, though, so I can safely ignore your opinion on fillums
I know it's unusual, but he is right about Submarine. Considine is as enjoyable as ever (I'm sure he is channeling Julian Cope during his sermons) but otherwise, it's box ticking generics.You don't like The Thing, though, so I can safely ignore your opinion on fillums
I did like the thing, but when you have seen it loads of times and you have memories of it that have elevated far beyond it's actual status, it's not as great to watch again.
When the shock moments do not surprise, and there is no suspense there is not much left.
The Rum Diary. Opening titles seemed familiar as did some of the supporting cast. Got about a third of the way through before remembering I'd already seen it and didn't think much of it. Once my expectations had been lowered like this, I think I enjoyed it more this time round. I might forget about it entirely and watch it again in a few years and declare it a work of genius.
I doubt you're going to think it's great tbh. I quite like Johnny Depp's version of Hunter S in the film of 'Fear And Loathing'. He hams it up a bit and plays for laughs but they're worth it. In this one, despite him supposedly being pretty pissed for half the movie, it's nowhere near as riotous and it doesn't really make much of a point other than 'this was the birth of a great writer'. I dunno, it's OK, there are a few giggles and that but that's it. I just thought that the director of 'Withnail & I' could've done a lot more with it. It's not shit but it's not brilliant either.I'm avoiding this as I really enjoyed the book. Am I missing out NVP?
...cinematography, atmosphere, music score, acting ? I can re-watch good films endlessly, even when I know what happens. I enjoy re-entering the world a favourite film takes place in.
The 80s film is not the original. And although I haven't seen it, the 2011 version is apparently a prequel to the 80s remake not a remake of the remake.I found the remake to be a pointless uninspiring re-tread with none of the 80s ness which made the original. And the spaceship bit on the end was just poor.
Excellent - three great films.Just stuck all of them on me Lovefilm list, ta.
The 80s film is not the original. And although I haven't seen it, the 2011 version is apparently a prequel to the 80s remake not a remake of the remake.