I caught the entire radio series of that - rivetting stuff, although grim at times.Lionel Shriver - So Much For That
Her writing in this is fantastic, am really loving it.
You know, her writing in this almost puts me in mind of Ray Bradbury, it's that poetic and exciting, and her insight into behaviours is extraordinary.I caught the entire radio series of that - rivetting stuff, although grim at times.
Bear with it - there's a believably happy ending, of sorts.You know, her writing in this almost puts me in mind of Ray Bradbury, it's that poetic and exciting. <snip>
Oh god there's no way I'm giving up on it, it's too brilliant for thatBear with it - there's a believably happy ending, of sorts.
That's a really good way to start a book based on a highly dubious premise - complain that it's far too expensive to do things properly. It does make one rather suspect that the rest of the book is similarly prone to equally shoddy 'research'I'm still on the first few pages where the publisher apologises for the typos from the OCR scanning of the text, and complains about the astronomical cost of proof reading.
Well, it's a 1920s book and it didn't sell very many copies, so the modern publishers added the OCR excuse because they had to scan a very old copy of the book. As for the subject matter, I would certainly say that there are two people who I think probably wrote the Shakespeare plays and I cannot make my mind up between them. 1) William Shakespeare (1564). 2) Edward de Vere (1550).That's a really good way to start a book based on a highly dubious premise - complain that it's far too expensive to do things properly. It does make one rather suspect that the rest of the book is similarly prone to equally shoddy 'research'
Aye, and the author is just 70 years dead - so its nicely out of copyright!Well, it's a 1920s book and it didn't sell very many copies, so the modern publishers added the OCR excuse because they had to scan a very old copy of the book. As for the subject matter, I would certainly say that there are two people who I think probably wrote the Shakespeare plays and I cannot make my mind up between them. 1) William Shakespeare (1564). 2) Edward de Vere (1550).
But he's a pretty decent scifi writer. Some of his short stories and Under The Skin are scifi.Just finished Michel Faber's "The Book of Strange New Things" and the whole thing was a bit of a disappointment. Lacked all of the drive of "The Crimson Petal and the White". I would never have guessed that they were by the same author. The plot might have made a half decent SF short story, but spread out over 500 pages? The whole thing had the slightly embarrassing whiff of "literary fiction writer does SF"...
I've still got that on my bookshelf after you recommending it yearrrrrrrs ago!! Bloody ace book that!Rereading 'Confessions of a Failed Southern Lady' after finding my ?fourth copy in a charity shop
I remember having to force myself to read 100 pages of Villette at a time, for a uni module. Christ, I fucking loathed that book - but like you say, that can be quite inspiring!I'm plodding my way through Little Women for the children's lit module I'm studying.
Bloody awful it is, so fucking saccharine it's making my teeth ache.
I think I would have hated it even as a young girl.
But on the bright side, it's often easier to write about books that you hate - at least I have a strong position on it
I had to do Middlemarch. I'm not surprised she pretended to be a bloke. I wouldn't have dared put my name to that load of shite, either.I remember having to force myself to read 100 pages of Villette at a time, for a uni module. Christ, I fucking loathed that book - but like you say, that can be quite inspiring!
Hi George. Welcome to the boards. To be on the safe side I recommend you read the FAQsGray Mountain by John Grisham...