Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

USA v Portugal (Group G) Sunday 22nd June

Blimey!! The USA should have done better with possession in the last 5 minutes but 2-2 is a decent result.

This will be an interesting group in the last two games. The 4-0 Germany vs Portugal game is gotta be a factor here.
 
USA just need to avoid getting thrashed by Germany - Germany more than capable of picking them apart - come on Ghana!

Look how many people came out to see the game in Chicago! Didnt see that in the UK did we?
 
If they win and us lose would that be enough? Or same gd means result of their match counts first?
i think thats what needs to happen - ghana win, US lose, and a certain goal difference - long shot, except US face Germany who have it in them to demolish teh US. I can see Portugal rolling over for Ghana
 
i think thats what needs to happen - ghana win, US lose, and a certain goal difference - long shot, except US face Germany who have it in them to demolish teh US. I can see Portugal rolling over for Ghana
Yep, cos as it stands it's US plus one, Ghana minus one which gets wiped out if win/lose goes that way
 
Bqxc-dEIcAE53Hi.jpg


;)
 
Fucking wankers. Ronaldo should have been given the Ribery treatment. He's unfit to play, could barely get himself onside on most plays. Mostly irrelevant and as a leader, seems to hold everyone to higher standards than him. Nobody can try a long shot, only his royal douchiness.

The only players that can get out of this mess with their heads up are Beto (2 goals in, but solid performance), Ricardo Costa (isn't worse than Pepe, who has let being a Real Madrid player go up into that big melon of his), Varela (bailed out Portugal in the group stage for the third time) and William Carvalho (surprise, a player in good match fitness performs better).

Bento is a complete idiot. Let him go back to play Football Manager. The medical/physio staff should be calling their families to empty their offices here. Ridiculous.
 
I calls it the World Trophy of Soccerballs, yessiree


The rules of association football were codified in the United Kingdom by the Football Association in 1863, and the name association football was coined to distinguish the game from the other versions of football played at the time, such as rugby football. The word soccer is an abbreviation of association (from assoc.) and first appeared in universities in the 1880s.[1][2] An early usage can be found in an English 1892 periodical.[3] The word is sometimes credited to Charles Wreford Brown, an Oxford University student said to have been fond of shortened forms such as brekkers for breakfast and rugger for rugby football (see Oxford -er). Clive Toye noted "A quirk of British culture is the permanent need to familiarise names by shortening them. ... Toye [said] 'They took the third, fourth and fifth letters of Association and called it SOCcer.'”[4]
The term association football has never been widely used, although in Britain some clubs in rugby football strongholds adopted the suffix Association Football Club (A.F.C.) to avoid confusion with the dominant sport in their area, and FIFA, the world governing body for the sport, is a French-language acronym of "Fédération Internationale de Football Association" – the International Federation of Association Football. "Soccer football" is used less often than it once was: the United States Soccer Federation was known as the United States Soccer Football Association from 1945 until 1974, when it adopted its current name and the Canadian Soccer Association was known as the Canadian Soccer Football Association from 1958 to 1971. Some soccer clubs, in Australia for example, still contain the words "soccer " in their titles.[

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_association_football
United Kingdom



The unqualified use of "football" in the United Kingdom tends to refer to the most popular code of football in the country, which in the case of England and Scotland is association football. However the term "soccer" is understood by all as a name for association football in the same way that colloquial term rugger is used for rugby union.[38][39] The word "soccer" was in fact the most common way of referring to association football in the UK until around the 1970s, when it began to be perceived incorrectly as an Americanism.[40]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_(word)#United_Kingdom


So, British people invented the word soccer, and used it themselves up until the 1970s. :)
 
Fucking wankers. Ronaldo should have been given the Ribery treatment. He's unfit to play, could barely get himself onside on most plays. Mostly irrelevant and as a leader, seems to hold everyone to higher standards than him. Nobody can try a long shot, only his royal douchiness.

The only players that can get out of this mess with their heads up are Beto (2 goals in, but solid performance), Ricardo Costa (isn't worse than Pepe, who has let being a Real Madrid player go up into that big melon of his), Varela (bailed out Portugal in the group stage for the third time) and William Carvalho (surprise, a player in good match fitness performs better).

Bento is a complete idiot. Let him go back to play Football Manager. The medical/physio staff should be calling their families to empty their offices here. Ridiculous.
Eder was shocking too.

In terms of Ronaldo, his twat quotient is off the scale. It's a bit like in athletics when they have to occasionaly redesign the javelin because it gets thrown too far. The atmosphere in the Portugese camp must be awful with the utter contempt he displays for this team mates. Strange thing, maybe I was bewitched when he was an MU player, I do like to see him play well. He's a mess though now, even his free kicks are in the stands.
 
I'm surprised
It was indeed, the idea that its an Americanism has only got around in the last twenty years or so.

kevin-keegan-annuall-77-01.jpg


SunSoccerAnnual1981-Book.jpg
To be fair, I wouldn't count the language used by The Sun as representative of the country as a whole.
 
I've never minded the term 'soccer' for football. It's just a colloquialism issn't it.

I think personally the Americanism stuff has derived mainly as a backlash because of their terminology of gridiron 'football' and a long period of indifference to the game. There's def hints of anti-americanism in it cos I've never seen anyone be like wtf at Italy for calling it 'calcio' and things like 'Soccer AM' and 'Soccer Annual' sound fine in context. It will always be football in the main.
 
A prediction: the US will become a world powerhouse in soccer/football - but it will take ten years. The game is growing in popularity there, with MLS expansion happening into New York etc.

As the game gets more exposure, and as salaries grow for professional players, people from a broader spectrum of US society will begin playing it - and with the large population base they have, good players will get produced.

At the moment, looking at the US team, it looks like a bunch of prep school boys.
 
Back
Top Bottom