WouldBe
Dislicksick
Might be mistaken for a large seagull.Sorry this is a stupid question but does white make it invisible?
Probably used white as white paint is always cheaper than coloured paint.
Might be mistaken for a large seagull.Sorry this is a stupid question but does white make it invisible?
Assuming that one billionaire acting in self interest hasn’t killed the other billionaire and maximised his oxygen potential?Presumably the search has to yield a result in the next few hours? If the air runs out tomorrow around breakfast time UK, the early hours of the morning are the last point at which this thing could ever be lifted from wherever it is? So the equipment would need to be down there and firmly attached to it before midnight. So they don’t really have until tomorrow morning at all - they have until about dinner time tonight to be found, at the latest? I feel so sorry for the 19 year old as I type this - he should have his whole life ahead of him.
Whitecaps, breaking waves appear white due to the scattering of all wavelengths of visible light by both the droplets of water they generate above the air-water interface, but also the air bubbles that their turbulence entrains in the water sub-surface (plumes of which can then tend to persist for a short time thereafter: can be as long as a few minutes). This is a Mie or non-molecular scattering regime - the scatterer particle sizes are similar to or larger than the incident radiation wavelength. Here forward scattering typically tends to bring all wavelengths back towards the observer so the point of interest appears white (or some shade of light grey). The phenomena is frequently visible in the lower atmosphere (eg haze arising due to various particulates).
Hence high vis red, orange or yellow for SAR related activities (note: human visual response peaks in the green/yellow, but yellow would be preferred as it stands out better in many natural landscapes).
Wondering how fast it would come up to the surface simply due to bouyancy? As all you would need is an rov to knock the counterweights off its skids.
Might have been an idea to have the counterweights held in place by an electromagnet so in the event of an electrical failure the weights would be dropped and you'd come up automatically.
I see a lot of similarities in the Estonia & Titanic disasters. Thank you for posting this...Btw, should anyone want a read, this is the best article I’ve ever read about the Estonia.
A Sea Story
One of the worst maritime disasters in European history took place two decades ago. It remains very much in the public eye. On a stormy night on the Baltic Sea, more than 850 people lost their lives when a luxurious ferry sank below the waves. From a mass of material, including official and...www.theatlantic.com
You can do the archive thing with the link, I can’t be arsed.
And you’ll never get on a ferry again.
I can count on one hand the number I’ve been on, and never go below deck. It’s the reason I once spent the whole night wide awake and with a clear sight line to the exit on a ferry between Aberdeen and Lerwick, despite having had a cabin booked by my employer, and knowing I had a full day of work ahead of me starting as soon as I arrived. And on the way back, I paid out of my own pocket to fly instead. Shetland is not a couple of hours hop by sea, so I couldn’t face the return to the mainland by ferry, only to have another journey to London by road straight afterwards.
Btw, should anyone want a read, this is the best article I’ve ever read about the Estonia.
A Sea Story
One of the worst maritime disasters in European history took place two decades ago. It remains very much in the public eye. On a stormy night on the Baltic Sea, more than 850 people lost their lives when a luxurious ferry sank below the waves. From a mass of material, including official and...www.theatlantic.com
You can do the archive thing with the link, I can’t be arsed.
And you’ll never get on a ferry again.
I can count on one hand the number I’ve been on, and never go below deck. It’s the reason I once spent the whole night wide awake and with a clear sight line to the exit on a ferry between Aberdeen and Lerwick, despite having had a cabin booked by my employer, and knowing I had a full day of work ahead of me starting as soon as I arrived. And on the way back, I paid out of my own pocket to fly instead. Shetland is not a couple of hours hop by sea, so I couldn’t face the return to the mainland by ferry, only to have another journey to London by road straight afterwards.
It’s a very atmospheric article. Real detail. Best read in daylight - from the technical side to the descriptions of the panic, chaos, fighting, robberies, decisions to leave relatives behind and and last sightings of the nearly escaped plunging down corridors that had become vertical shafts instead, it’s not nighttime reading.I see a lot of similarities in the Estonia & Titanic disasters. Thank you for posting this...
Why would a sub that has lost power be stuck at 120m down, when it had obviously gone a lot deeper than that (1h 45m) in the first place? Genuine question.
To me? I was just saying what The Guardian had reported as a contrast to Sky. The thinking seemed to be that it was no deeper than that, because the buoyancy stuff had done its job, even though the power itself had failed - hence missing without contact. That was how they explained the assessment of whatever expert had offered it. The reason for that conclusion was something to do with the sound barrier that the equipment dropped by the aircraft would expect to encounter otherwise.Why would a sub that has lost power be stuck at 120m down, when it had obviously gone a lot deeper than that (1h 45m) in the first place? Genuine question.
The BBC had someone with a similar opinion.To me? I was just saying what The Guardian had reported as a contrast to Sky. The thinking seemed to be that it was no deeper than that, because the buoyancy stuff had done its job, even though the power itself had failed - hence missing without contact. That was how they explained the assessment of whatever expert had offered it. The reason for that conclusion was something to do with the sound barrier that the equipment dropped by the aircraft would expect to encounter otherwise.
To me? I was just saying what The Guardian had reported as a contrast to Sky. The thinking seemed to be that it was no deeper than that, because the buoyancy stuff had done its job, even though the power itself had failed - hence missing without contact. That was how they explained the assessment of whatever expert had offered it. The reason for that conclusion was something to do with the sound barrier that the equipment dropped by the aircraft would expect to encounter otherwise.
If it is 120 mtrs deep they could surely risk getting out and swimming for it? Not read the thread so im assuming they could exit the sub without external help.
I don't think there exit can open.If it is 120 mtrs deep they could surely risk getting out and swimming for it? Not read the thread so im assuming they could exit the sub without external help.
((Owl and the Pussy Cat))Its considered bad luck to paint an ocean going boat green.
Jeez what a great design featureThey can't. They are bolted in from the outside.
The pressure changes would kill you.If it is 120 mtrs deep they could surely risk getting out and swimming for it? Not read the thread so im assuming they could exit the sub without external help.
In extremis it may be worth a try. If your boxygen is depleted and no other options are available?I don't think there exit can open.
Plus even.if it did the water coming in would hit them like a truck. Then they would have to clamber out one by one. Then a 120 meter swim to the surface with no air.
Then don't die of exposure.
Then be spotted as tiny dots in the water rather than one big truck sized objects.
Let’s hope so. It sounds much less bleak than being stuck at the bottom, and much easier for the rescue ship to sling a rope round when it’s eventually pinned down to a location.The BBC had someone with a similar opinion.
tbf even before this shenanigans they wouldn't have wanted somebody going all claustrophobic and trying to open the hatch when they were on the way down.Jeez what a great design feature
i dont imagine a mini sub trip to be the best way for a claustrophobe to spend their holidays though but?tbf even before this shenanigans they wouldn't have wanted somebody going all claustrophobic and trying to open the hatch when they were on the way down.
I imagine cancellations will be sky high across the sector as billionaires decide their Tuscan palazzos, private islands, and even just staying at home in Kensington Palace Gardens all sound more appealing after all.i dont imagine a mini sub trip to be the best way for a claustrophobe to spend their holidays though but?
you might not know it until you were sealed in a tin can the size of a small car thousands of feet below the sea.i dont imagine a mini sub trip to be the best way for a claustrophobe to spend their holidays though but?