Another conspiraloon but not just fucking annoying a la Jazzz. Properly mentally unstable.
Banned for their own good some years back.
Just a general point rather than wanting to get into an argument with you (or anyone else) but no one here can or should (IMO) decide that that another poster is "mentally ill", "mentally unstable" or anything similar.
And similarly, no one should be banned "for their own good", unless they've actually broken the rules, as
kingfisher previously did and previously was. If he does it again, he can expect to be banned again, but unless he does, I don't see why he shouldn't remain.
There are various posters here who are, by their own admission (don't like that word, but can't think of a better one ATM) "mentally ill", "mentally unstable" or similar, and that includes me, and it's worth remembering that at times they/we get significant real support by posting on Urban.
At times, getting too obsessive or too involved here might not be a good thing for one's mental health - I've been like that at times and I've felt, FWIW, that some others might have been too, although it's not for me to say for sure. But in the end, all of us here, whether we're mentally unstable or not, are and should be responsible for what and how we post, and I really don't think we as a community should be suggesting or considering banning people "for their own good". Posters should only be banned as a last resort, and only for serious infractions of the rules, for the good of the whole community rather than for their protection, because none of us here are in any position to judge that last one.
All just my opinion, but it seemed an appropriate time and place to say it.