Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

tippin a load of tampons in the princess diana memorial fountain

making ridiculous yet serious accusations recently.

This one?

harry6230_2197613a.jpg
 
What makes you think he had anything to do with the CIA?

And he's not being kicked out of the country. He's been given a one year jail sentence suspended for 18 months.

So this guy gets found guilty by a jury of taking headless and footless, long lens photos, of a kid in a bikini. Other fap pictures of children are subsequently found in his possession, and you shout 'conspiracy'.

Why hasn't this revolting prick been banned yet?
Because he's doing far too good an impression of being a barking idiot, and the warm fuzzy side of Urban is therefore cutting him some slack?

Well, could be, anyway :)
 
Well if he's mentally ill he should be sent the way of Windsor for his own good, not kept around to be prodded with sticks like some Victorian freak show.
 
the problem is that the state so often brands as mentally ill people who quite rationally dislike the monarchy, like that poor lad who fired a starting pistol at the queen many years ago.
 
Another conspiraloon but not just fucking annoying a la Jazzz. Properly mentally unstable.

Banned for their own good some years back.

Just a general point rather than wanting to get into an argument with you (or anyone else) but no one here can or should (IMO) decide that that another poster is "mentally ill", "mentally unstable" or anything similar.

And similarly, no one should be banned "for their own good", unless they've actually broken the rules, as kingfisher previously did and previously was. If he does it again, he can expect to be banned again, but unless he does, I don't see why he shouldn't remain.

There are various posters here who are, by their own admission (don't like that word, but can't think of a better one ATM) "mentally ill", "mentally unstable" or similar, and that includes me, and it's worth remembering that at times they/we get significant real support by posting on Urban.

At times, getting too obsessive or too involved here might not be a good thing for one's mental health - I've been like that at times and I've felt, FWIW, that some others might have been too, although it's not for me to say for sure. But in the end, all of us here, whether we're mentally unstable or not, are and should be responsible for what and how we post, and I really don't think we as a community should be suggesting or considering banning people "for their own good". Posters should only be banned as a last resort, and only for serious infractions of the rules, for the good of the whole community rather than for their protection, because none of us here are in any position to judge that last one.

All just my opinion, but it seemed an appropriate time and place to say it.
 
Just a general point rather than wanting to get into an argument with you (or anyone else) but no one here can or should (IMO) decide that that another poster is "mentally ill", "mentally unstable" or anything similar.

And similarly, no one should be banned "for their own good" ...
Take it up with the mods and those that advocated for it at the time.
 
I never understand all the 'it was Prince Phil wot dunnit' theories. She'd already been long divorced in '97 and would've likely just been another Fergie figure had she lived. Why any of that would've mattered enough to bump her off is a mystery to me.
Not long divorced, it was the year before.
 
perhaps her death is something that is set in stone now, perhaps it cant be changed..

You were expected to grasp the basics of this kind of thing when your parents flushed your first goldfish down the bog...

Anyway, I wish you luck in your exploits and hope you can get some kind of corporate sponsorship by a hip and edgy Hoxton artisan tampon company (who might ask you to change the colour of the dye, but artistic compromises are inevitable with this sort of thing).
 
Just a general point rather than wanting to get into an argument with you (or anyone else) but no one here can or should (IMO) decide that that another poster is "mentally ill", "mentally unstable" or anything similar. ..

It does make a difference that kf has mentioned a diagnosis, doesn't it? So the people expressing concern about a possible, er, florid phase agreed with the medics. Take care of yourself, kf.
 
the only protesting i did at the diana memorial was stay in there til 8 o clock, chatted with the spy playing dress up, drank from a glass bottle of whisky, and wrote SIS RULES, MI5 DROOLS in pink chalk. then rolled around drinking and trying to get section/voluntary admission for a coupla days to transcribe my dictaphone.
junior doctor "dagan lonsdale" whos protesting against the department of health asked the DoH to call the police because he wanted to go to sleep,
they didnt turn up.
police outside of downing street wouldnt section me, even though i was talking to one about operation midland (all fucked up) and just calling the other one a cunt to his face.
cold night, euston station - the behavioural detection unit accosted me three 25 year oldw with beards gave me some liquirice and menthol fags, wouldnt section me, wouldnt give me receipt -(dont do those anymore) so i told them i had drugs on me, but they still wouldnt.
but you know, i didnt really want to be sectioned apart from to transcribe my dictaphone and sleep, iv had a sleep now so.
i do believe someone has to say these things. i mean fo4r the future historians.
i didnt even visit MI5 on this trip, i dont know why, i think i was consci0ously and subconsciously guided away from it.
lots of retired and semi retired and tramps privately agree with me, read city of spies miracle man story by neil gaiman.
anyway thanks for the support, even if you cant write it over plaintext
 
Back
Top Bottom