Spion
I hear ya
AgreedRave in the late 80s early 90s...
AgreedRave in the late 80s early 90s...
Interesting to try and sort it out tho. Subjective feelings of enjoyment or whatever are bound to be a common theme of any music. Whether that music is truly innovative and to what extent it represents new social trends etc should be something one could argue a good case for, like any phenomenon in historyyeh, but I addressed that. I don't dispute these golden periods happen (although that's a whole subjective can of worms too:
LOLask some luddite muppet like lightsoutlondon whether the rave scene was a golden age of musical development and he'll beat you to death with a Judas Priest album).
Ultimately, my point is/was that you could watch prime time, or late night Friday TV back in the late 70's and get a full on, politically driven, non-commercial pop song from nowhere being broadcast to millions.
Ultimately, my point is/was that you could watch prime time, or late night Friday TV back in the late 70's and get a full on, politically driven, non-commercial pop song from nowhere being broadcast to millions.
The other point was/is that pop seemed to evolve so rapidly during the late 70's. So many genrés all mixed up together, but still clearly defined in their own style. They were cool times. Bands from nowhere with no, or very little backing got air time on mainstream BBC radio and TV. It wasn't uncommon to hear John Peel playing a mates of a mates of a mates latest record. Still happens I guess, but the commercial world has taken far to much control and stagnated the pop scene as far as the vast majority audience is concerned.
Whatever, Art is the new Rock'N'Roll anyway
I'm off to make music with the kids.
I started writing down the Top 30 every week, in an orange-covered school exercise book from when the Jam went straight into number 1 with Going Underground in 1980. I used to sit and listen to the chart run-down when it happened every Tuesday evening, with Mike Reid iirc. I would say that there seemed to be a greater proportion of exciting music around at that time than currently - however, that may also be because i was younger and more excited by music then than now.
You're not actually listening to anything people are saying, are you?
No change there then.
Non-commercial and politically driven? Really? The very fact that a piece of music is broadcast on prime time TV in the first place is enough to indicate that it is in fact commercial.
Perhaps you could give us an example?
You're still spouting the same line as you were 3 pages ago, despite lots of compelling arguments contradicting you.
...
Perhaps if you lived here you'd be in a better position to comment?
((((stanley)))
do not go gently into that dark night, rage rage against the dying...
oh, no, he's gone.
I still say the majority of music shoved down faces today is more crap than it was.
I think that's a clear victory to the rationalists, eh?
Yep, that's us told. The twin collossi of Sweaty and Drunken Stanley have certainly put the kibosh on my arguments.
How old are you?And FWIW I think 78-84 shits over all musical periods before and since.