Nice test for my new Bluetooth headphones
Quadrophenia remains one of my favourite-ever albums. I can't say I'd want to see them play it live now though.
the way entwistle and moon combine on this is just extraordinary.
Barba O'Reilly is good on headphones.Nice test for my new Bluetooth headphones
Quadrophenia is a 10/10 album.
I have a soft spot for Rog too. A working class lad who has stayed quite grounded. He has updated his look with the times, hair an all (ahem Jagger and Plant).
I heard an interview with him where he said he's still got the same mates since school ,so if he got too poncey they told him all about it.
Got his book for Christmas, will read next I think
Barba O'Reilly is good on headphones.
fuck me that's awfulAlso Rog produced one of the best worst videos ever
The studio version of Tommy sounds a bit puny these days but there are a tonne of good soundboard live recordings of the Tommy material from the following years that sounds much better. I love the dynamic of those shows - start off with a loud walloper ( like Heaven & Hell), follow it with a few quieter numbers then bring it back to the boil again. Townshend in his white boiler suit - partly because he has work to do and partly so people at the back of the 60,000 crowd can see him.I haven't listened to Quadrophenia in years but sat down with the whole thing last night. It really is an extraordinary piece of work - the complexity of the songs and musical themes somehow successfully married to great, straight ahead rock'n'roll and exploring profound themes of alienation, identity and spirituality.
The band were musically at their peak and Townshend at his most creatively ambitious. Its saved from being some pretentious prog nonsense by the raw emotion and brutal honesty of the songs and the musical self discipline - there's no extended jam whig outs or musical filler despite it being a double album.
I don't think he ever really got over how it was not a hit on the same level of Tommy - ( the stress of the project nearly broke him and split the band) - but it has aged far better in retrospect. Possibly the bands finest work?
Easily, in my book. It's a magnificent piece of work. Powerful, melancholic and bursting with alienation and anger. And Keith Moon was never better.I haven't listened to Quadrophenia in years but sat down with the whole thing last night. It really is an extraordinary piece of work - the complexity of the songs and musical themes somehow successfully married to great, straight ahead rock'n'roll and exploring profound themes of alienation, identity and spirituality.
The band were musically at their peak and Townshend at his most creatively ambitious. Its saved from being some pretentious prog nonsense by the raw emotion and brutal honesty of the songs and the musical self discipline - there's no extended jam whig outs or musical filler despite it being a double album.
I don't think he ever really got over how it was not a hit on the same level of Tommy - ( the stress of the project nearly broke him and split the band) - but it has aged far better in retrospect. Possibly the bands finest work?
I haven't listened to Quadrophenia in years but sat down with the whole thing last night. It really is an extraordinary piece of work - the complexity of the songs and musical themes somehow successfully married to great, straight ahead rock'n'roll and exploring profound themes of alienation, identity and spirituality.
The band were musically at their peak and Townshend at his most creatively ambitious. Its saved from being some pretentious prog nonsense by the raw emotion and brutal honesty of the songs and the musical self discipline - there's no extended jam whig outs or musical filler despite it being a double album.
I don't think he ever really got over how it was not a hit on the same level of Tommy - ( the stress of the project nearly broke him and split the band) - but it has aged far better in retrospect. Possibly the bands finest work?
yeah - apparently the problem was they had to play along to pre-recorded backing tracks with the synth parts and a metronome. The who - and moon in particular - are not really the sort of band who are going to thrive when playing to a click track.
As a Mod for as long as I can remember, i must admit to never ever getting The Who. i agree they were a rock band, but never really saw the connection with the mid scene, imho the early Stones were far more "mod" than The Who.Is anyone thinking of going to see them this summer or, if like me, do you just feel the two remainers are past it?
I have just tried to look to see how much tickets are and I can't. So annoyed that I will get priority booking by preregistering for their new album
I gather, and they say this will not detract from the overall effect, that they will be supported by lots of strings and horns - though I guess it's a way of adding some power. For goodness sake, the Who were a proper rock band, a band that blasted out numbers, had fights and were a 4 piece band.
They smashed up stage kit, hotels Etc. That was the Who, that is how they should be, not two old geezers with zimmer frames....time to move on guys.
loved you back then.....
I just read Rog's book and he said they really just latched onto the mod thing in the early days as a marketing ploy, although he did like the sharp clothes. Their mod phase was very short though.As a Mod for as long as I can remember, i must admit to never ever getting The Who. i agree they were a rock band, but never really saw the connection with the mid scene, imho the early Stones were far more "mod" than The Who.
Charlton, mid '70s. Did it rain? Was there a massive laser show?
'74 me thinks?
'74 me thinks?