A Dashing Blade said:Revelence?
But define GM please.
genetically modified
this isnt a trick question
*in order to highlight a point.
A Dashing Blade said:Revelence?
But define GM please.
I can't believe I'm reading this jibe. I've provided many articles and quotes in my posts and links explaining how the banks have been swindling us and continue to do so. You have gone from confidently thinking you know everything about it to dismissing the actual method by which banks create credit as impossible and illegal to refusing to admit that you were wrong.slaar said:I wouldn't worry phil
...as this leaves you lot out.
Jazz, do you have a single, solitary piece of evidence to suggest that prosperity would follow from the removal of an interest-based money system? Because I suspect you don't.
zArk said:genetically modified
this isnt a trick question
*in order to highlight a point.
zArk said:i am accepting that your sources do not mention the Iran Bourse and Euro
zArk said:Just because you havent heard about it doesnt mean it isnt fact.
FixedzArk said:Just because you saw it on the internet doesnt mean it's fact.
zArk said:well it is clear that you dont know, didnt read, didnt see on the news or hear from anyone that;
Food derived from GM Round-Up Ready maize line GA21 is now legal for sale in the UK and will be placed in all areas of the food market.
None of your links explain anything. They brush over the areas that actually matter, insinuating that what banks do is somehow underhand when any GCSE Economics textbook tells you what they do. I have not dismissed it as impossible and illegal, it is quite possible and quite legal, but bears no resemblence to the processes you extrapolate and suppose.Jazzz said:I can't believe I'm reading this jibe. I've provided many articles and quotes in my posts and links explaining how the banks have been swindling us and continue to do so. You have gone from confidently thinking you know everything about it to dismissing the actual method by which banks create credit as impossible and illegal to refusing to admit that you were wrong.
I could supply more arguments and links for you, but what would be the point? I can't see that you would actually bother to pay any attention to them.
zArk said:well it is clear that you dont know, didnt read, didnt see on the news or hear from anyone that;
Food derived from GM Round-Up Ready maize line GA21 is now legal for sale in the UK and will be placed in all areas of the food market.
relavance?
Just because you havent heard about it doesnt mean it isnt fact.
Blagsta said:GM food's been on sale in the UK for a number of years.
Blagsta said:I love the way you keep changing your argument
Are you not capable of distinguishing between two different definitions of the word "argument," then?Azrael23 said:Didn`t realise we were here to argue Blagsta, is that what U75 is to you? A debating club where you get an excuse to be as vile and self righteous as you like?
Azrael23 said:Didn`t realise we were here to argue Blagsta, is that what U75 is to you? A debating club where you get an excuse to be as vile and self righteous as you like?
Azrael23 said:Didn`t realise we were here to argue Blagsta, is that what U75 is to you? A debating club where you get an excuse to be as vile and self righteous as you like?
zArk said:Baudrillard is correct -
Simulation is no longer that of a territory, a referential being or a substance. It is the generation by models of a real without origin or reality: a hyperreal. The territory no longer precedes the map, nor survives it. Henceforth, it is the map that precedes the territory - precession of simulacra - it is the map that engenders the territory and if we were to revive the fable today, it would be the territory whose shreds are slowly rotting across the map. It is the real, and not the map, whose vestiges subsist here and there, in the deserts which are no longer those of the Empire, but our own. The desert of the real itself.
Azrael23 said:Didn`t realise we were here to argue Blagsta, is that what U75 is to you? A debating club where you get an excuse to be as vile and self righteous as you like?
zArk said:i thought you were in columbia
zArk said:i thought you were in columbia
phildwyer said:That's all very well, and Baudrillard's hyper-reality, the supersession of the real by images, is a predictable enough consequence of the rule of exchange-value--which is itself an image. The trouble is, though, that unlike his former Situationist colleague Debord (who really deserves the credit for Baudrillard's ideas), Baudrillard refuses to admit that use-value *ever* existed, and also ignores the fact that exchange-value is alienated labour. This robs his analysis of the ethical critique which so so pronounced in Debord. He comes close to endorsing, or even celebrating, the postmodern condition.
Leaving aside everything else, what evidence exists for any of the above?zArk said:There really are 13 families who claim to own the world and they use the debt based economy to enslave the populations of the world.
Sociology, cultural studies, psychoanalysis are all produced through this system and perpetuate it. They are baseless in their foundations.