ItWillNeverWork
Messy Crimbobs, fellow humans.
So the Enabling Act gets through
If you mean the Emegency Powers act , yes 185 to 151. But for all the frothing coming from certain parts of inlooking media I don't think its a comparative enabling act. It is time limited to 30 days and the New Democratic Party, which supported, have promised to pull before that, if safe to do so.So the Enabling Act gets through
... if safe to do so.
Yep coz it's not entirely in one party"s hands and most definitely NOT as Tucker Carson told his audience last night indefinite emergency powers.Well that's reassuring
Yep coz it's not entirely in one party"s hands and most definitely NOT as Tucker Carson told his audience last night indefinite emergency powers.
Tucker Carlson's propaganda? It looks like you're the one doing that.Who gives a fuck what Tucker Carlson says? Use your eyes. Look what's happening. Stop believing the propaganda.
Tucker Carlson's propaganda? It looks like you're the one doing that.
I think the sort of Canadian protester who claims 1st Amendment rights in a Canadian court cares what Tucker Carson has to sayWho gives a fuck what Tucker Carlson says? Use your eyes. Look what's happening. Stop believing the propaganda.
Well you've just been told what he's saying and it seem to be the same as what your saying so 'een pot nat' as the Dutch say.I've never watched Tucker Carlson in my life so I wouldn't know
You forgot "sheeple". HTH. HAND.Who gives a fuck what Tucker Carlson says? Use your eyes. Look what's happening. Stop believing the propaganda.
If it were just for protesting I'd agree with you. It's not though, is it. They weren't just protesting as has been covered above.
You forgot "sheeple". HTH. HAND.
Take a look at yourself. Your frothing outrage at people disagreeing with you, and your "you lot" sweeping generalisations, are all classic hallmarks of the dyed-in-the-wool conspiraloon. Maybe you're not, but you're doing a bloody good impression of one.Huh huh huh. Hilarious
conspiraloon
If that's true then it's excessive.
Assuming it even happened. What have you done to check the veracity of that story, or did you just see something that conveniently fitted your agenda and posted it uncritically?What about this lady?
Think of it more as a descriptor than an insult.Find a better insult. This one doesn't work anymore. So what do you think of the woman above? You think she is a 'terrorist'?
No I don't. Do you think the white supremacist organizer is a terrorist?
where did I say that? You're making stuff up.I don't know much about this person. What does "organiser" even mean in the time of social media? Most of those involved are just regular people that are fed up with being shat on and turn up to protest as a result. Do you honestly think there are thousands and thousands of white supremacists involved here? That's a preposterous idea
Ah, semantics, the last refuge of the scoundrel. Do keep digging that holeI don't know much about this person. What does "organiser" even mean in the time of social media? Most of those involved are just regular people that are fed up with being shat on and turn up to protest as a result. Do you honestly think there are thousands and thousands of white supremacists involved here? That's a preposterous idea
Assuming it even happened. What have you done to check the veracity of that story, or did you just see something that conveniently fitted your agenda and posted it uncritically?
Because there seem to be some questions as to whether "Briane", and her donation, even exists...
Oh, please...Sounds like you're proposing that an elected MP is engaged in a conspiracy to deceive us. Careful you don't step into 'conspiraloon' territory.
where did I say that? You're making stuff up.
Ah, semantics, the last refuge of the scoundrel. Do keep digging that hole
You were replying to me and used those words. So you did say I did. That's a preposterous strawman.Do you honestly think there are thousands and thousands of white supremacists involved here? That's a preposterous idea