Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Islamic state

A lot of those refugees are going to be pretty angry towards their local hosts,resulting in a lot of ugly scenes across Turkey

That has been happening for months now. At least try to keep up.

this will in turn lead a lot of potential tourists deciding on Clacton as an alternative

And yet again, this patronizing Western idea that Turkey will do anything for Western tourists. Your posts drip with Imperialist nostalgia, but those days are over.
 
Last edited:
The Turkish state is very far from supporting anything IS does, except fight against the PKK.

But they´re willing to let their enemies fight each other, while they stand back and watch. That´s just basic realpolitik.
Are you really saying they haven't supported them?
 
when were the days when turkey cared how it was seen by the one-dimensional western media?

For most of the twentieth century, Turkey worried greatly about Western opinión. It had to. It suffered a crippling defeat in WW1, was stripped of its empire, and only just staved off full-scale Imperialist occupation.

It took seventy years to recover from that, but recover it did. Even then, most Turks aspired to friendly relations with the West, and wanted to join the EU. But once the West started using the Armenian "genocide" as an excuse to exclude them, they realized they were being strung along and started looking eastwards instead. As you´re now discovering, this means that Turkey will no longer do the West´s bidding.

And thus we see that failure to admit Turkey into the EU was a blunder of world historical proportions. Now we´re beginning to count the cost of that mistake.
 
Last edited:
Are you really saying they haven't supported them?

On the ground, at the moment?

I´ve no idea, and nor does anyone else. I do however know that IS is antithetical to the Turkish state in every way imaginable--not least racially. So there is absolutely no prospect of a long-term alliance with them.
 
What is this, some new kind of Imperialism of the Left?

In 1973 OPEC started to demand a fair price for their oil, as opposed to the imperialists´price, which had been imposed on them by forcé and/or the threat of forcé.

Why do you think this insistence on being treated as an equal partner amounts to some coercive "strapping over a barrel" (whatever that means)?

Would you prefer that we took their oil for pennies, as we once did?

Turkey has been developing into a modern democratic society/economy over the last few decades, looks like the present administration has decided this was a mistake
TBH, I would prefer we left the oil in the ground, it's the Wests dependence on the stuff that has caused most of this misery.
 
On the ground, at the moment?

I´ve no idea, and nor does anyone else. I do however know that IS is antithetical to the Turkish state in every way imaginable--not least racially. So there is absolutely no prospect of a long-term alliance with them.

Aye, but turkey's 'marriage of convenience' with them is going to bite Turkey in the arse big time.
 
Turkey has been developing into a modern democratic society/economy over the last few decades, looks like the present administration has decided this was a mistake

The present administration has a different view of concepts like "development" and "modernity."

It´s also worth pointing out that they were democratically elected. Three times in succession. While also winning two constitutional referenda. By landslides in every case.

And I say all that as their enemy. Their friends would put it more forcefully.

TBH, I would prefer we left the oil in the ground, it's the Wests dependence on the stuff that has caused most of this misery.

That horse left the station some time ago.
 
Last edited:
For most of the twentieth century, Turkey worried greatly about Western opinión. It had to. It suffered a crippling defeat in WW1, was stripped of its empire, and only just staved off full-scale Imperialist occupation.

It took seventy years to recover from that, but recover it did. Even then, most Turks aspired to firendly relations with the West, and wanted to join the EU. But once the West started using the Armenian "genocide" as an excuse to exclude them, they realized they were being strung along and started looking eastwards instead. As you´re now discovering, this means that Turkey will no longer do the West´s bidding.

And thus we see that failure to admit Turkey into the EU was a blunder of world historical proportions. Now we´re beginning to count the cost of that mistake.

I would think, given Turkey's present intransigence re; it public commitments towards Kobane, that not admitting it into the EU was one of the EUs few sensible decisions.
 
the difference, it seems to me, is rather larger as turkish islamists do not appear to be millenarian whereas the likes of aq and isis are rather more apocalyptick. and turkish islamists seem to be more national than the internationalists (or pan-nationalists) of isis.

The difference is racial.

It often happens that the peoples who are most different from each other in cultural terms live in close geographical proximity. Chinese and Japanese is one example. But even that pales into insignificance compared with the yawning divergence between Arabs and Turks.

Arab Islamism is a very different beast from Turkish Islamism.
 
I would think, given Turkey's present intransigence re; it public commitments towards Kobane, that not admitting it into the EU was one of the EUs few sensible decisions.

The point--I would have thought obviously--is that Turkey´s "intransigence" is in large part the result of the EU´s refusal to admit them.
 
When you abandon and wantonly betray 20% of your population then the consequences can be somewhat difficult! you reckon the Kurds have presented Ankara with a few problems in the past? Watch and wait.

The vast majority of Kurds are loyal citizens of Turkey who loathe the PKK about a million times more than I do.
 
The point--I would have thought obviously--is that Turkey´s "intransigence" is in large part the result of the EU´s refusal to admit them.
There was no 'refusal' just a requirement that they met entry requirements, which for a while they seemed to be attempting, but it seems the Islamist faction prevailed over the pro western faction.
 
The vast majority of Kurds are loyal citizens of Turkey who loathe the PKK about a million times more than I do.
You keep saying this but I see no evidence, schisms, factions aye, but the Kurds seem to have a robust sense of nationality which embraces all factions.
 
To some degree, but I think older antipathies play the larger part.

They play an important part, certainly.

Basically though, the West missed a golden opportunity to get Turkey permanently onside. If they´d been allowed into the EU in say 2000, the AK Party would never have been elected, and history would have taken a very different course.

For various reasons, the EU decided it didn´t need Turkey. I suppose it was assumed that Turkey would always remain a third-world country and a minor power not worth bothering about. Whoever assumed that had not studied their HISTORY. Like most people here it would seem.
 
You keep saying this but I see no evidence, schisms, factions aye, but the Kurds seem to have a robust sense of nationality which embraces all factions.

The PKK is a Stalinist organization using Maoist tactics. Most Kurds understandably want nothing to do with them.
 
I think it was probably more a mixture of geopolitics and a technocratic analysis based on the synchronicity of economies. Hindsight is always 20/20 but no one saw this situation coming.
 
There was no 'refusal' just a requirement that they met entry requirements, which for a while they seemed to be attempting, but it seems the Islamist faction prevailed over the pro western faction.

Yes, they met requirement after requirement. They turned themselves inside out meeting ever-more demanding requirements for about 20 years. No sooner did they meet one than another was invented. They finally threw their hands up in disgust and gave up when they were asked to confess to genocide.

You must admit, that´s a pretty big ask. I don´t think many countries would be willing to meet that particular requirement.
 
You keep saying this but I see no evidence, schisms, factions aye, but the Kurds seem to have a robust sense of nationality which embraces all factions.

They do in my experience. Discount the national borders and Kurdistan is one contiguous territory. I've never known Kurds describe themselves as Iraqi, Iranian or whatever.
 
Back
Top Bottom