8ball
Decolonise colons!
I´m the only person in this discussion who actually has something at stake here.
I don't think that's true.
I´m the only person in this discussion who actually has something at stake here.
And the Kurds are certainly God botherers.
A lot of those refugees are going to be pretty angry towards their local hosts,resulting in a lot of ugly scenes across Turkey
this will in turn lead a lot of potential tourists deciding on Clacton as an alternative
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_genocideThe Ottoman Empire? It lasted about a thousand years, so I´d say it had a pretty good run. Especially when compared to the British versión
Are you really saying they haven't supported them?The Turkish state is very far from supporting anything IS does, except fight against the PKK.
But they´re willing to let their enemies fight each other, while they stand back and watch. That´s just basic realpolitik.
when were the days when turkey cared how it was seen by the one-dimensional western media?
Are you really saying they haven't supported them?
What is this, some new kind of Imperialism of the Left?
In 1973 OPEC started to demand a fair price for their oil, as opposed to the imperialists´price, which had been imposed on them by forcé and/or the threat of forcé.
Why do you think this insistence on being treated as an equal partner amounts to some coercive "strapping over a barrel" (whatever that means)?
Would you prefer that we took their oil for pennies, as we once did?
On the ground, at the moment?
I´ve no idea, and nor does anyone else. I do however know that IS is antithetical to the Turkish state in every way imaginable--not least racially. So there is absolutely no prospect of a long-term alliance with them.
Turkey has been developing into a modern democratic society/economy over the last few decades, looks like the present administration has decided this was a mistake
TBH, I would prefer we left the oil in the ground, it's the Wests dependence on the stuff that has caused most of this misery.
Aye, but turkey's 'marriage of convenience' with them is going to bite Turkey in the arse big time.
For most of the twentieth century, Turkey worried greatly about Western opinión. It had to. It suffered a crippling defeat in WW1, was stripped of its empire, and only just staved off full-scale Imperialist occupation.
It took seventy years to recover from that, but recover it did. Even then, most Turks aspired to firendly relations with the West, and wanted to join the EU. But once the West started using the Armenian "genocide" as an excuse to exclude them, they realized they were being strung along and started looking eastwards instead. As you´re now discovering, this means that Turkey will no longer do the West´s bidding.
And thus we see that failure to admit Turkey into the EU was a blunder of world historical proportions. Now we´re beginning to count the cost of that mistake.
Well they are a monolithic bloc deserving of murder, rape and enslavement so they might as well all be labelled as god botherers as well
the difference, it seems to me, is rather larger as turkish islamists do not appear to be millenarian whereas the likes of aq and isis are rather more apocalyptick. and turkish islamists seem to be more national than the internationalists (or pan-nationalists) of isis.
How so?
I would think, given Turkey's present intransigence re; it public commitments towards Kobane, that not admitting it into the EU was one of the EUs few sensible decisions.
When you abandon and wantonly betray 20% of your population then the consequences can be somewhat difficult! you reckon the Kurds have presented Ankara with a few problems in the past? Watch and wait.
The point--I would have thought obviously--is that Turkey´s "intransigence" is in large part the result of the EU´s refusal to admit them.
There was no 'refusal' just a requirement that they met entry requirements, which for a while they seemed to be attempting, but it seems the Islamist faction prevailed over the pro western faction.The point--I would have thought obviously--is that Turkey´s "intransigence" is in large part the result of the EU´s refusal to admit them.
You keep saying this but I see no evidence, schisms, factions aye, but the Kurds seem to have a robust sense of nationality which embraces all factions.The vast majority of Kurds are loyal citizens of Turkey who loathe the PKK about a million times more than I do.
To some degree, but I think older antipathies play the larger part.
You keep saying this but I see no evidence, schisms, factions aye, but the Kurds seem to have a robust sense of nationality which embraces all factions.
Fair do,s but I think the EU was prepared to give them a chance.To some degree, but I think older antipathies play the larger part.
There was no 'refusal' just a requirement that they met entry requirements, which for a while they seemed to be attempting, but it seems the Islamist faction prevailed over the pro western faction.
You keep saying this but I see no evidence, schisms, factions aye, but the Kurds seem to have a robust sense of nationality which embraces all factions.